Bob
I'll have to disagree with higher octane being less efficient (that is if I understand what you mean by efficiency). High octane (98 RON) high density fuel is all the rage here in Australia. Started by Shell with Optimax, which an LS1 powered Commodore owning friend put me onto, followed sometime later by BP with Ultimate 98 and later again Mobil with Synergy 8000. The average user sees 15-20% reduction in fuel consumption, 20% for me in an 89 Mazda turbo. Recently I changed to a smaller private company Trafigura Fuels product Evolution 98 which they import from Asian hi-tech refinery (www.trafigura.com.au/evolution) Even better than Optimax. They all smell like rocket fuel! Commodore owner gets 160kms extra per tank, I get extra 100kms in the Mazda (smaller tank). It actually works out cheaper than buying crap std unleaded which is 92 RON. Price differential is 7-9c litre more (say 10%). My Outback 2.5 went from approx 360kms per tank around town to over 500 using Evo 98 and Redline fluids throughout. Shell were the 4th largest in fuel sales in the State of Victoria where Optimax is made, after it was released they went straight to no #1, a position they have held ever since. In a way I think your right in that it's not the high octane so much as it is being a HD fuel. Thats where I think the extra 'energy' or whatever it should be called comes from. I'm surprised these technology fuels are not available in the U.S or Canada, as Mobil is a U.S company.