Originally Posted By: Astro14
Mislead customers? You're already making value judgements....
Here's my take: Toyota and Lexus customers have different expectations for longevity of ownership. Keep a car for forever, and brake fluid changes, etc. are a wise investment. Keep a car for a few years, and you, the original owner, never see the return on that investment. Tailored recommendations for typical ownership profiles.
But you're on this forum. You know that changing the brake fluid, etc. (as the OM for both my Mercedes and both my Volvos recommend) will be worth it in the long run...
So is a Highlander and an RX350 fundamentally different in those systems where a delta exists? A Camry V6 and an ES350? A hybrid vs normal, or a performance model I could certainly understand, but for variants which seem to be quite similar (need to be VERY careful here to ensure they are), cant understand why.
Or is it just that a firsthand/second hand buyer has deeper pockets for one than the other and can be sold to pay for more work at higher rates?
Are those types of vehicles even sold someplace where high speeds and other ops are the norm? At least BMW/MB/Saab/Volvo have some semblance of an excuse, supposedly at least.
Other than brake fluid, the PM regimen on all my Euro vehicles really are no different than my US and previous Japanese vehicles. BF has a specific reasoning due to high speed driving that many will argue (and it isnt the point here) is unnecessary for more or less any USA driving.
Its totally reasonable that Toyota would profit monger off of one group and their assumed fiscal capability versus another, without technical basis. No different than best buy showing different prices to those well enough to do to have a wifi capable device within their stores, or amazon supposedly charging more to people browsing on a safari browser.