One needs to be careful about what assumptions you buy into when using off-the-shelf solutions to problems. 'Wider is better' may work well on dry pavement within some speed/temp/load range, but wider tires can end up with less traction on wet pavement and other conditions. On wet pavement tires often end up relying upon mechanical 'locking' with irregularities on the road, and a layer of water can effectively makes the road smooth, like at too high of speed where hydroplaning becomes a problem. Wider tires will tend to 'float' more on a layer of water compared to thinner tires, which is one reason why the 'Aquatread' kind of looked like two adjacent motorcylce tires. The thinner tread results in higher normal loads, allowing the tire to make better contact with the road surface. Wider tires these days often seem to have generous, directional grooves for channeling rain, sometimes also with agressive shoulder lugs for other conditions.
I can remember testing how well my motorcycles handled heavy rain with standing water on the road at speed, and typically I was good up to over 80 mph throwing the bike side to side in my lane before I noticed the traction starting to suffer. In SoCal when it rains it's almost like ice storms in other parts of the country, as a lot of people have wide, high performance tires, many with marginal siping and rain grooves.
I can remember testing how well my motorcycles handled heavy rain with standing water on the road at speed, and typically I was good up to over 80 mph throwing the bike side to side in my lane before I noticed the traction starting to suffer. In SoCal when it rains it's almost like ice storms in other parts of the country, as a lot of people have wide, high performance tires, many with marginal siping and rain grooves.