Originally Posted By: ExMachina
Originally Posted By: stephen9666
The sensors in my 2011 Cruze also vary in accuracy. Two of them can be up to 4 psi off. But, they've never falsely triggered the low-pressure warning.
Maybe you got the same 2011 GM batch that I did. Their requirements for calibration quality-consistency is just too loose. I wonder if the TREAD Act law (in the U.S.) that forced cars to have these mentioned anything about minimum sensor calibration?
Originally Posted By: oldmaninsc
On my Impala, when cold the sensors are very close to any one of my "Accutire" gauges. But when hot, the sensors read about 2-3 lbs. lower than the gauges. Weird! Though I think it's "cool" to see the tire pressure in the Driver Information Center, I still trust my gauges more.
Depends on if its a cheap gauge, or a decent one, and even then, any single guage can be off, so average a few if you're interested. ... I'm not seeing the temperature differences in calibration offset you're seeing, and I don't know why a sensor would/can do that unless the sensor membrane is losing flexibility or has expansion/contraction sealing issues(???).
I guess you missed the part in my post where I said ". . . when cold the sensors are very close
to any one of my "Accutire" gauges." For that matter my cheap pencil and analog dial gauge also read within about .5 - 1 lb of each other and the 4 Accutire gauges, and one other no name digital gauge. Is that enough of an average? LOL
While the Accutire gauges may not be the most expensive in the world, they do appear to be fairly accurate and reliable. If I find a gauge to be consistently several pounds off, I usually throw it away.
I have no idea either why the difference between hot and cold on the sensor vs. the gauge issue, and to be honest haven't really spent that much time thinking about it - just pointing out my observation.