Originally Posted By: MarkStock
Originally Posted By: crazyoildude
i have found that filters that do not filter don't get dirty..
that goes with them all
There have been cases of FRAM's with the bypass stuck open.
I could see this going either way, but then look at the results.
If one accepts that the filters don't "filter" well, then that would explain a long lifecycle.
If one accepts that the fitler ADBV was open, then that would explain a long lifecycle.
But, how would that explain the "need" for a "better" filter? The car didn't die an ugly death, did it? It's almost a condemnation of the concept that filters would be needed. I'm not saying that filters are worthless. What I'm saying is that between the two of you, your positions of a poor quality OCOD (either poor media or poor ADBV) results in a car that had nothing go wrong with it. So why should folks get so worked up over a normal OCI with the OCOD? By your logic, complete filter failure had no consequence after 20k miles.
Your unintended contribution to the debate is that filter failure is inconsequential because the reality is that nothing bad happened.
OTOH - I would contend that the OCOD here performed a job well enough with no failures. It functioned probably in a decent manner, and the conditions of operation were mellow enough that nothing overt happened. The OCOD isn't the "best" made filter; I think we'd agree on that. What I'm pointing out is that filtration isn't the only thing that controls wear, and this particular situation didn't suffer because of it.
The OP took it apart, after a very lengthy OCI. And yet is was essentially normal to him. Why must it infer a failure just because it lasted so long? Did it ever occur to us that the conditions were such that the filter and engine simply were not in a condition severe enough to elicit failure?