Oh, I'm all about the sarcasm, lol. It's one trait I picked up from my dad, lol.
In terms of benefit, I asked math and math said no. CapriRacer seems to confirm that.
It's simply that the properties of nearly pure Nitrogen and air is nearly the same in all meaningful properties. It just doesn't do anything different. All the properties between each is just so close that any minute difference just isn't meaningful. For multi-billion dollar racing where a tiny, tiny bit of advantage means winning, nitrogen has its place. However, I think they too are being fed a good amount of marketing b.s. Still, the differences on that level are "significant" enough to consider the use. For consumer use, a butterfly can flap its wings in Argentina and any benefit you had would be lost. It's really just a matter of scale.
In terms of benefit, I asked math and math said no. CapriRacer seems to confirm that.
It's simply that the properties of nearly pure Nitrogen and air is nearly the same in all meaningful properties. It just doesn't do anything different. All the properties between each is just so close that any minute difference just isn't meaningful. For multi-billion dollar racing where a tiny, tiny bit of advantage means winning, nitrogen has its place. However, I think they too are being fed a good amount of marketing b.s. Still, the differences on that level are "significant" enough to consider the use. For consumer use, a butterfly can flap its wings in Argentina and any benefit you had would be lost. It's really just a matter of scale.