I think about this from time to time, but just haven't thought about it while on these forums.
I have been placing a small (1/2" round, 1/4" thick) neodymium magnet on the side of the oil filters on my vehicles to catch iron particles inside the filter, without affecting the bypass valve.
The good thing is that it is removing the iron/steel wear particles, thus preventing recirculation of the particles, thereby reducing wear. The particles are also handily disposed of at filter change.
The conundrum is UOA's: The iron readings *should* be lower than without the magnet. So, I guess the primary concern is how to determine the wear rate in a UOA when the iron is being removed with the filter.
I have been placing a small (1/2" round, 1/4" thick) neodymium magnet on the side of the oil filters on my vehicles to catch iron particles inside the filter, without affecting the bypass valve.
The good thing is that it is removing the iron/steel wear particles, thus preventing recirculation of the particles, thereby reducing wear. The particles are also handily disposed of at filter change.
The conundrum is UOA's: The iron readings *should* be lower than without the magnet. So, I guess the primary concern is how to determine the wear rate in a UOA when the iron is being removed with the filter.