'97 subaru legacy: 10k mile OCI M1 10/30. At 90,000 miles all OHC valve clearances were within spec. Internals clean, shiny, zero buildup/discoloration. Consumption was varied at 106,000 miles when we sold it, DC commuting affected consumption. Went as far as 12,000 mile OCI, but I got scared. 25,000 miles/yr.
'97 pathfinder. 4.5 qt sump. 10,000 mile OCI. It'd "feel" funny if ya went beyond 12,000 miles. M1 10/30. Never a whisper out of the motor, no noticeable consumption. Occassional heavy towing. Did this a long time.
'02 Chrysler T&C 3.3. 10,000 mile OCI, M1 10/30. As long as the commute was long, this OCI was great. After moving to a short commute, The startup racket began at 5,500 miles on this oil and by 6,000 I was done with it. first 25,000 miles/yr, then 12,000 miles/yr
'02 accord 2.3L 7,500 OCI on variety of synthetics. M1 x/20 has been overall the quietest/least consumed. even syntec x/20 started allowing valve tap ~2500 miles into it. Valv-syn was NOISEY. I think M1 x/20 would easily go 10 in this motor, but worry 'bout insolubles. It can get dusty here. 15,000 miles/yr.
'99 crv. 7,500 oci on dino. zero problems, exh valve clearance bad at 65,000. caught it before damage. switched to synthetc, 8,000 oci. some varnish/chocolate staining inside the valve cover. It drives more smoothly on syn, and downshifts are more "connected" feeling as engine revs quicker (4spd AT). 15,000/yr
I find that number of cool-down cycles means more than mileage. Except in extremely short commute scenarios, I am a believer in extended OCIs with syn. Also, I find M1 x/20 to be much more consistent feeling over its life than the 5/30 10/30 flavors, and arguably more consistent that syntec 0/20. Might jive with the M1 japanese website quoted recently that listed 0/20 and 5/40 as Gp IV, 5/30 10/30 as G III.
Mike