First off anyone would have to be completely lacking in common sense, or else be flat out nuts to think an anti gun media outlet like CNBC would give ANY firearms company a fair and fact worthy piece of news concerning anything involving their product. Anymore than they would Trump. Their hate for both is well cemented in their bias. More importantly is the fact not one of the rifles documented in that obvious hit job could be made to malfunction in either a laboratory or a courtroom.
Also, Remington proved every rifle involved in these suits was either tampered with by people outside the factory. Or else was in poor operating condition due to rust, dirt, along with other signs of poor firearm maintenance. And most importantly, where was the number 1 rule of gun safety in all of these disasters? You never allow the muzzle of a weapon to be pointed at anything you do not wish to destroy..... EVER. It was obviously not followed in a single one of them, or no one would have ever been shot.
Yes, Remington has been forced to pay out millions of dollars to settle these cases of idiots shooting other innocent people with their guns. Just as the light aircraft industry has been forced to pay out millions of dollars to the families of idiot pilots who flew their airplanes out of fuel or into the ground, because of their obvious lack of ability or concern for safety for themselves, and those innocent passengers who were flying with them. And the same way drug companies in this country have been forced to pay out millions of dollars to families of people who jumped out of windows, or blew their brains out while taking medication they manufactured, and were improperly, or overly prescribed by idiot doctors.
Law suits involving sympathetic, snowflake juries who pay out outrageous sums of money to people who flat out do not deserve it, is hardly ever been a valid reason to determine the validity of any product being sold today. But sadly for many people who like to rely on their emotions instead of fact, it has become one.
Also, Remington proved every rifle involved in these suits was either tampered with by people outside the factory. Or else was in poor operating condition due to rust, dirt, along with other signs of poor firearm maintenance. And most importantly, where was the number 1 rule of gun safety in all of these disasters? You never allow the muzzle of a weapon to be pointed at anything you do not wish to destroy..... EVER. It was obviously not followed in a single one of them, or no one would have ever been shot.
Yes, Remington has been forced to pay out millions of dollars to settle these cases of idiots shooting other innocent people with their guns. Just as the light aircraft industry has been forced to pay out millions of dollars to the families of idiot pilots who flew their airplanes out of fuel or into the ground, because of their obvious lack of ability or concern for safety for themselves, and those innocent passengers who were flying with them. And the same way drug companies in this country have been forced to pay out millions of dollars to families of people who jumped out of windows, or blew their brains out while taking medication they manufactured, and were improperly, or overly prescribed by idiot doctors.
Law suits involving sympathetic, snowflake juries who pay out outrageous sums of money to people who flat out do not deserve it, is hardly ever been a valid reason to determine the validity of any product being sold today. But sadly for many people who like to rely on their emotions instead of fact, it has become one.
