Recent Topics
2009 Kia Sorento Cam Timing
by NYEngineer
09/26/16 06:52 AM
Trans Flush Advice
by Local Color
09/26/16 12:04 AM
Supertech ST4386
by goodtimes
09/25/16 11:49 PM
Horizontally and vertically mounted oil filters?
by dx92beater
09/25/16 09:13 PM
Tall extension ladders for gutter cleaning
by JHZR2
09/25/16 09:01 PM
Schaeffer oil
by J57
09/25/16 08:48 PM
Arnold Palmer
by SaturnIonVue
09/25/16 08:05 PM
Buying oil tomorrow,please help me decide
by mrjlube
09/25/16 07:28 PM
Change Oil light- Condition not mileage- accurate?
by gallydif
09/25/16 07:11 PM
Possible rust areas on 2015 Ford F250
by Donald
09/25/16 06:39 PM
Drives under Ubuntu need periodic optimization?
by Quattro Pete
09/25/16 05:34 PM
Pennzoil Platinum darkens quickly
by Run
09/25/16 05:33 PM
Newest Members
andy1400, KevinTate, jerseyguy123, Robin2, kylemaro
59193 Registered Users
Who's Online
59 registered (4WD, ARB1977, Al, Bamaro, aquariuscsm, 2015_PSD, 3 invisible), 1325 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59193 Members
66 Forums
254931 Topics
4187353 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#3032754 - 06/13/13 09:36 PM Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Have both in my stash the xp is a napa platinum same filter as far as i know what would would say is the better or preferred filter for a 10k oci with amsoil xl as dar as efficiency, capacity and build quality.


Edited by jdmstr22 (06/13/13 09:38 PM)
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032780 - 06/13/13 09:56 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
KCJeep Offline


Registered: 06/30/11
Posts: 6421
Loc: Mahzurrah!
Virtually a toss up IMO although the Fram likely has the edge in filtering efficiency since the Ultra runs 99%. Frankly 10k would probably be under utilizing either one of them.
_________________________
2004 Jeep Grand 4.0 @ 134k Pennzoil HM 10w30 w/ 1 qt 10w40
Fram PH8A
KIA Sedona 63k, Ford Focus 117k, Chrysler Sebring 186k, Chrysler Concorde 120k

Top
#3032812 - 06/13/13 10:41 PM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
HTSS_TR Offline


Registered: 04/17/06
Posts: 19528
Loc: Lake Forest, CA
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.
_________________________
'00 MB E430
'04 Honda S2000
'06 Volvo V70
'14 Honda Accord LX
"Throwing food away is like stealing it from the poor and hungry" Pope Francis

Top
#3032892 - 06/14/13 01:07 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: HTSS_TR]
jdmstr22 Offline


Registered: 12/04/12
Posts: 275
Loc: Illinois
Originally Posted By: HTSS_TR
I agree with KC, Purolator Pure 1 is good for 8-12k OCI. For 15k or longer then either Wix XP or Fram Ultra or Napa platinum will be needed.


I wish i could use a pure one but ive tried and i get a bad valvetrain noise with them the synthetic filters flow a little better to my understanding and i tend not to get valve tic with them.
_________________________
06 Sonata GLS 2.4 177k PP5W30 OEM Filter
03 BMW M5 68k Castrol TWS 10W60 OEM Filter

Top
#3032935 - 06/14/13 04:39 AM Re: Wix 51334XP VS Fram Ultra 9688 [Re: jdmstr22]
dnewton3 Offline



Registered: 05/14/07
Posts: 6367
Loc: Indianapolis, IN
A total toss up; both are way more capable than the 10k miles you're going to put them through.

Construction is nearly identical; silicone ADBV, wire backed syn media, premium build with robust materials, high holding capacity, etc.

Any UOA data or PC data you could find by using either of these would be well within the "normal" deviation of typical use, and would indicate they are statistically the same. While the lab efficiency ratings (of which Wix has become quite evasive in posting recently) may favor one over the other, the real world use will not reveal any difference; they are both premium products. Any difference would only be attributed to daily variation and not performance potential.

It simply won't matter, except in your head. The engine will not be able to distinguish any difference whatsoever.

Total overkill for your intended OCI, but as BOF would say, that's the U'Mericun way ...


Edited by dnewton3 (06/14/13 04:46 AM)
_________________________
Conventionals vs. Synthetics isn't about which is "better"; it's about which lasts longer, while assuring safe operation, in relation to cost. Any product can be over or under utilized. The same applies to filters.
Make an informed decision; first consider your operating conditions, next determine your maintenance plan, and then pick your lube and filter. Don't do it the other way around ...

Top