Recent Topics
Changed oil, Ravenol FullSynth Turbo VST 5W-40
by NotEnoughSpeed. 07/17/19 08:30 PM
Blending TCW3 in diesel
by 32319. 07/17/19 08:27 PM
Leaking Batteries
by ecotourist. 07/17/19 08:22 PM
Shake down tow complete!
by ls1mike. 07/17/19 08:22 PM
Looking for cheap int'l air tix
by daves66nova. 07/17/19 08:05 PM
Not *new* per se, but $3.98 for 5 quarts of M1
by mrdctaylor. 07/17/19 07:45 PM
Winter tires for 2019 Ram
by NissanHauler. 07/17/19 06:16 PM
Is the car hobby/enthusiast a dying breed?
by Redright9. 07/17/19 05:48 PM
Mobil One design change M1C-154A
by piesled. 07/17/19 05:26 PM
crazy granny gear spotted
by Number_35. 07/17/19 04:32 PM
Grease gun suggestions
by rideon. 07/17/19 04:16 PM
17 Imprezza 2.0
by JHogan. 07/17/19 03:42 PM
new boat, considering twin f 150 yamis
by 1978elcamino. 07/17/19 03:20 PM
Preventative repair - 2009 Ford Flex water pump
by KGMtech. 07/17/19 02:56 PM
Bought out phone lease for a song
by 14Accent. 07/17/19 02:54 PM
Do you have a fave RTV sealant you use?
by ZZman. 07/17/19 01:36 PM
Scanner
by tiger862. 07/17/19 12:36 PM
Newest Members
patman3d, Oillogger, Rob707, rageyourdreams, Beemer25
68692 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
124 registered members (2015_PSD, 4WD, 07hemi, 01rangerxl, 14 invisible), 1,936 guests, and 27 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics292,007
Posts5,015,086
Members68,692
Most Online2,967
Mar 10th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Hop To
Page 1 of 5 1 2 5
Under a CR-V's valve cover #2635614
05/25/12 07:09 AM
05/25/12 07:09 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
I removed the valve cover and checked the valve lash adjustment this morning on our 2008 CR-V. This is the 2.4L K24Z1 engine, and with right at 59,000 miles currently. Oil history: Valvoline white bottle from the dealer at intervals specified by the maintenance minder (about 7-8k miles each), from new until when I bought it with about 45,000 miles. When I bought it, I put in Pennzoil Platinum 5W-20, then Mobil 1 0W-20 at 50,000 miles, and Mobil 1 0W-20 again at 55,000 miles. So the oil you see in it is 4,000 mile old M1.

The camshaft lobes look great. You can see where the rollers roll on the lobes, but there's no real visible "wear" in terms of scarring, grooving, etc. The timing chain and tensioner guides also look like they're still new.





You can see how the 2-lobe version of VTEC works in this picture. The #1 cylinder (far left) is apparently on its intake stroke. The primary lobe (the big one) operates the right-hand intake valve and the secondary lobe (the skinny one) operates the left-hand intake valve. You can see the primary lobe has depressed its intake valve, but the intake valve under the secondary lobe doesn't appear to be open at all. In truth, it's cracked open slightly, but not hardly enough to even tell. Under 2,200 rpm, the two intake rocker arms are not connected, and the two intake valves operate independently. In essence, it operates like a 12-valve engine (1 intake and 2 exhaust valves). Once 2,200 rpm is reached, a pin within the primary intake rocker arm slides over and engages the secondary rocker arm, and both rocker arms operate off the primary (larger) cam lobe.

This promotes good port velocity at lower engine speeds to maximize torque in those conditions, and still allows for good mid- and high-speed operation with both intake valves operating off the "big" cam. You can also see the camshaft phaser on the intake camshaft just inside the timing chain. On this version of the K-series engine, the cam phaser can advance or retard the camshaft through 25 degrees of rotation in either direction. Some of the performance-oriented K-series engines have 45 or 50 degree phasers, but the economy versions have 25 degree phasers.

There is no phaser on the exhaust cam, and there is no VTEC on the exhaust cam. The exhaust rocker arm is shaped like a Y, and a single roller rides against a single cam lobe (for each cylinder), and the rocker arm depresses both exhaust valves. I assume this was done to reduce friction (only one lobe per pair of valves).

Insides look good for the miles and past oil history. My plan is to continue with 5,000 mile OCIs, but with PYB instead of a synthetic offering.

Larger picture versions here: Picasa

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635617
05/25/12 07:12 AM
05/25/12 07:12 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,003
Dallas,Tx USA
aquariuscsm Online content
aquariuscsm  Online Content

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,003
Dallas,Tx USA
Valvoline dino seems to keep engines really clean.


1996 Nissan 300ZX 5-speed,Arctic Pearl(#175 of 300)
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30
2012 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L 2.4,auto,San Marino Red
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635621
05/25/12 07:22 AM
05/25/12 07:22 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,139
Great White North.. eh
webfors Offline
webfors  Offline

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,139
Great White North.. eh
OMG where is all the sludge from using dino!! grin

Nice and clean. That engine will run forever on VWB/PYB while everything else falls apart around it.


17 Cadillac ATS 2.0T, Edge D1G2 5w30, Champion COS10590
17 Dodge GC, VWB 5w30, Mopar MO-349
18 DL1000XT, Valvoline Dino 20w50, Suzuki OEM OF
Small engines; RT5 10w30
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635639
05/25/12 07:57 AM
05/25/12 07:57 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 242
Florida
BigBird57 Offline
BigBird57  Offline

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 242
Florida
That is one clean engine. Currently my son purchased a 2000 Lexus ES 300 with 160k on the clock. The oil change history is somewhat clouded but the "Sludge Monster" took over this engine. He dropped the oil pan and the sludge was hard and dry like pine bark. We have pics and have started the remediation process. After cleaning the pan and the oil pick up tube he has 17 psig at idle and 70 psig at 3k RPMs.
The engine is running smooth and we are hoping for the best. He has installed PYB 5w-30 SN/GF5 with a longer Purolator Classic oil filter with 8 oz of Seafoam in the crankcase.


It is ok to expect, however you have to inspect.
2002 Tahoe 5.3 PU 5w-30
2011 Toyota Sienna V6 PP-0w-20
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635648
05/25/12 08:07 AM
05/25/12 08:07 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 608
New Jersey
TomYoung Offline
TomYoung  Offline

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 608
New Jersey
Congrats on clean engine, but this disassembly at this low mileage on a functioning unit is not really merited...

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635653
05/25/12 08:16 AM
05/25/12 08:16 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,574
Merritt Island FL, USA
chubbs1 Offline
chubbs1  Offline

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,574
Merritt Island FL, USA
Thanks for the pics! Always nice to see a clean engine. The more I see the less I think I need to ever use Grp III and up.


'12 Charger SXT
QSUD 5w30 OEM filter

'12 Charger SXT
Edge FST EP 5w30 OEM (Mine;)

'11 Hyundai Sonata GLS
QSUD 5w20 OEM Filter

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: BigBird57] #2635658
05/25/12 08:22 AM
05/25/12 08:22 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,300
Canton, GA
lexus114 Offline
lexus114  Offline

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,300
Canton, GA
Originally Posted By: BigBird57
That is one clean engine. Currently my son purchased a 2000 Lexus ES 300 with 160k on the clock. The oil change history is somewhat clouded but the "Sludge Monster" took over this engine. He dropped the oil pan and the sludge was hard and dry like pine bark. We have pics and have started the remediation process. After cleaning the pan and the oil pick up tube he has 17 psig at idle and 70 psig at 3k RPMs.
The engine is running smooth and we are hoping for the best. He has installed PYB 5w-30 SN/GF5 with a longer Purolator Classic oil filter with 8 oz of Seafoam in the crankcase.



Did he pull the valve covers yet?


2018 Nissan Maxima S
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635686
05/25/12 08:48 AM
05/25/12 08:48 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,849
UT
Bill in Utah Offline
Global Moderator
Bill in Utah  Offline
Global Moderator

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,849
UT
Does Honda need to have the valves checked at such a low mileage?

I guess I need to check my lash (I think 150k is the number) but am afraid to open it up since its not leaking/seeping at all. Sounds the same as when I bought it and running perfect.

Someday....

Looks good for low miles.

Bill

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: lexus114] #2635689
05/25/12 08:49 AM
05/25/12 08:49 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,849
UT
Bill in Utah Offline
Global Moderator
Bill in Utah  Offline
Global Moderator

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,849
UT
Originally Posted By: lexus114
Originally Posted By: BigBird57
That is one clean engine. Currently my son purchased a 2000 Lexus ES 300 with 160k on the clock. The oil change history is somewhat clouded but the "Sludge Monster" took over this engine. He dropped the oil pan and the sludge was hard and dry like pine bark. We have pics and have started the remediation process. After cleaning the pan and the oil pick up tube he has 17 psig at idle and 70 psig at 3k RPMs.
The engine is running smooth and we are hoping for the best. He has installed PYB 5w-30 SN/GF5 with a longer Purolator Classic oil filter with 8 oz of Seafoam in the crankcase.



Did he pull the valve covers yet?


Yep...

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: TomYoung] #2635690
05/25/12 08:52 AM
05/25/12 08:52 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,627
London, ON, Canada
SLCraig Offline
SLCraig  Offline

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,627
London, ON, Canada
Originally Posted By: TomYoung
Congrats on clean engine, but this disassembly at this low mileage on a functioning unit is not really merited...


It is because with Honda's you have to periodically check the last adjustment on the valves. It is common to crack an engine like this at least especially if you're a car enthusiast (like most BITOG'ers)


2010 Civic SI sedan 6MT
PP 5w30 | Fram TG | Pennzoil MTF
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635720
05/25/12 09:23 AM
05/25/12 09:23 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,003
Dallas,Tx USA
aquariuscsm Online content
aquariuscsm  Online Content

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,003
Dallas,Tx USA
Anyone here on BITOG have any "inside engine/under valvecover" pics while using Castrol GTX?


1996 Nissan 300ZX 5-speed,Arctic Pearl(#175 of 300)
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30
2012 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L 2.4,auto,San Marino Red
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: TomYoung] #2635733
05/25/12 09:38 AM
05/25/12 09:38 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,287
PNW/WA
JOD Offline
JOD  Offline

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,287
PNW/WA
Originally Posted By: TomYoung
Congrats on clean engine, but this disassembly at this low mileage on a functioning unit is not really merited...


On this car (and most Honda's), it's actually a pretty good idea. Honda spec'd 30K valve adjustments for years. When they first went to 100K intervals, they ended up with a lot of burned valves... The K-series engines are supposedly better, but the one I checked @ 60K needed pretty much all of the exhaust valves adjusted. They had tightened up, so it's not like you're actually going to be able to hear that. I think 60K valve adjustments are a good idea on this engine.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635741
05/25/12 09:42 AM
05/25/12 09:42 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,386
North Texas
ARB1977 Offline
ARB1977  Offline

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,386
North Texas
Im at 70K on the same V. There was some valve noise with mobil one, switched to Amsoil no more tick. Great suv for sure. OLM is at 10K intervals.


2015 Tacoma 4.0L 60K (as of 02/23/18)
AMSOIL SS 0W30 / Toyota filter

2018 CRV 1.5L (as of 05/11/18)
Factory fill / Honda filter
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635796
05/25/12 10:38 AM
05/25/12 10:38 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,902
Louisiana
BrianWC Offline
BrianWC  Offline

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,902
Louisiana
Nice. You've got me wanting to crack open the 02 CR-V. I never have, believe it or not.


2002 Honda CR-V EX AWD
2018 Volkswagen Atlas SEL-P 4Motion
2018 Volkswagen GTI S
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635861
05/25/12 11:54 AM
05/25/12 11:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,753
Canuck living in California
KrisZ Offline
KrisZ  Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,753
Canuck living in California
Thanks for sharing these pics. thumbsup
One more proof that sticking with proper maintenance schedule is far more important than oil type or brand choice.


2015 Grand Caravan 3.6L - 31k miles.
2006 Mazda 3 2.0L - 171k miles
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: aquariuscsm] #2635899
05/25/12 12:45 PM
05/25/12 12:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,766
Bend, Oregon
Oregoonian Offline
Oregoonian  Offline

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,766
Bend, Oregon
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Valvoline dino seems to keep engines really clean.


The last three OCI were SYNTHETIC.....not dino....PP 5w20 and M-1 0w20.

Since we haven't seen the engine with just dino....we could conclude that.... SYNTHETIC seems to keep engines really clean.


03' Ford Focus SE(2.3L Duratec PZEV)/ 140K +
Pnz. Ultra 0w20 / Fram 'Ultra'/ OCI: 8000 +/-
ATF: Mercon V w/Lubegard Red

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2635926
05/25/12 01:16 PM
05/25/12 01:16 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,479
Chicago Area
mechtech2 Offline
mechtech2  Offline

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 19,479
Chicago Area
Clean engines are normal. Especially at under 60k miles.

I note the discoloration/varnish on the oil separator and valve cover in the pics above it's not as clean as you think in there.
And more importantly, the #2 exhaust cam is worn/ grooved. Look at the reflection on it.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Oregoonian] #2636023
05/25/12 02:53 PM
05/25/12 02:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,003
Dallas,Tx USA
aquariuscsm Online content
aquariuscsm  Online Content

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,003
Dallas,Tx USA
Originally Posted By: Oregoonian
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Valvoline dino seems to keep engines really clean.


The last three OCI were SYNTHETIC.....not dino....PP 5w20 and M-1 0w20.

Since we haven't seen the engine with just dino....we could conclude that.... SYNTHETIC seems to keep engines really clean.





**Oil history: Valvoline white bottle from the dealer at intervals specified by the maintenance minder (about 7-8k miles each), from new until when I bought it with about 45,000 miles*

^^From the op`s first post. Re-read it in it`s entirety please,unless you`re suggesting that 10,000 miles of pseudo-syn and syn cleaned up his severely sludged-ruined by VWB dino engine?


1996 Nissan 300ZX 5-speed,Arctic Pearl(#175 of 300)
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30
2012 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L 2.4,auto,San Marino Red
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: mechtech2] #2636025
05/25/12 02:54 PM
05/25/12 02:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Originally Posted By: mechtech2
And more importantly, the #2 exhaust cam is worn/ grooved. Look at the reflection on it.


There is no real "wear" on it, though it may appear so in the one photo. Unfortunately, low-light photography is only so good. I said this in the first post:

Quote:
You can see where the rollers roll on the lobes, but there's no real visible "wear" in terms of scarring, grooving, etc.


There really is no grooving there...nothing you can feel with your fingernail anyway. What you see is the track where the rocker arm roller follows the cam. But the lobe itself is not scarred or grooved. Here is a different angle on it, with different light. Also, what you're looking at is the direct peak of the lobe, so the wear pattern is slightly different there (as it is on all of them) where the roller tops the peak of the lobe.



Opening the valve cover this early probably wasn't necessary, but Honda did used to specify 30k mile valve lash adjustments, and they all of a sudden jumped to 100k, so I figured it would be good to check. Plus, this engine does put out some "clackity" noises when colder, so I wanted to rule out valve adjustment. And it's definitely ruled out...all of the valves were within tolerance except for the #1 exhaust valves. They were slightly tight. The other exhaust valves were perfect (.011"). #2 and #3 intake valves were within spec at .009", but I wanted all the intake valves at .008", so I adjusted those.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: aquariuscsm] #2636094
05/25/12 04:46 PM
05/25/12 04:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,766
Bend, Oregon
Oregoonian Offline
Oregoonian  Offline

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,766
Bend, Oregon
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Originally Posted By: Oregoonian
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Valvoline dino seems to keep engines really clean.


The last three OCI were SYNTHETIC.....not dino....PP 5w20 and M-1 0w20.

Since we haven't seen the engine with just dino....we could conclude that.... SYNTHETIC seems to keep engines really clean.





**Oil history: Valvoline white bottle from the dealer at intervals specified by the maintenance minder (about 7-8k miles each), from new until when I bought it with about 45,000 miles*

^^From the op`s first post. Re-read it in it`s entirety please,unless you`re suggesting that 10,000 miles of pseudo-syn and syn cleaned up his severely sludged-ruined by VWB dino engine?


Not suggesting that at all! But....it started with dino....but for the last 10K +/- has been with some of the best synthetics available (PP and M1) both of which have great reputations as oils that 'clean'. Based on those facts, that engine might have had issues with dino (especially at 7K to 8K OCI's)....but the use of high quality synthetics....might have cleaned it up. Just my opinion.


03' Ford Focus SE(2.3L Duratec PZEV)/ 140K +
Pnz. Ultra 0w20 / Fram 'Ultra'/ OCI: 8000 +/-
ATF: Mercon V w/Lubegard Red

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2636107
05/25/12 05:17 PM
05/25/12 05:17 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
I will say that, at least visually, the engine hasn't appeared to get cleaner or dirtier since I've owned it. There are some dark areas in the camshaft bearing towers in the crevices...little pockets of varnish it seems. I can see some of these through the oil fill hole, and have monitored it continuously since I bought the car. I was hoping that the oil I've been using would clean those little pockets of varnish, but that has not happened. I'm not saying that the engine couldn't generally be cleaner today compared with when I bought it, but it visually hasn't changed...again, at least what I can see through the oil fill hole.

Would these pockets of varnish (not even pea-sized, mind you) have formed if synthetic were used from the beginning? I don't know. Would these pockets of varnish eventually clean up if I continue with quality "cleaning" synthetic oils? I don't know the answer to that either.

This is one reason I'm moving back to conventional (PYB or VNG). I will say that the engine was noisiest on cold starts with VWB, at least of the oils that I've run in it, so if I do try Valvoline again, it'll be the NextGen variety to see if there's any difference. It seems to be the quietest on the M1 AFE. I have not used PYB in it, and look forward to that, because I previously owned a slightly noisy 4-cylinder (Nissan KA24E), and a high moly oil (Havoline) really helped to quiet that motor down. And PYB is also highly regarded as a "cleaning" oil, so maybe it'll slowly improve with consistent 5k mile OCIs.

And let me append something I wrote earlier. I didn't mean to imply that the camshaft lobes have, literally, no wear. Obviously these are metal parts with metal rollers riding on them...there will be wear. What I was looking for was scarring, grooving, pitting, stuff like that. And what I found were 12 cam lobes that were very smooth, with no wear pattern that could be felt with a fingertip. I have observed cam lobes that appeared ground down over time, scalloped, scuffed, etc. Those are the kinds of things I was looking for, not that I really expected to find them. And I was happy to not find them.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Oregoonian] #2636147
05/25/12 05:53 PM
05/25/12 05:53 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,753
Canuck living in California
KrisZ Offline
KrisZ  Offline

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,753
Canuck living in California
Originally Posted By: Oregoonian
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Originally Posted By: Oregoonian
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Valvoline dino seems to keep engines really clean.


The last three OCI were SYNTHETIC.....not dino....PP 5w20 and M-1 0w20.

Since we haven't seen the engine with just dino....we could conclude that.... SYNTHETIC seems to keep engines really clean.





**Oil history: Valvoline white bottle from the dealer at intervals specified by the maintenance minder (about 7-8k miles each), from new until when I bought it with about 45,000 miles*

^^From the op`s first post. Re-read it in it`s entirety please,unless you`re suggesting that 10,000 miles of pseudo-syn and syn cleaned up his severely sludged-ruined by VWB dino engine?


Not suggesting that at all! But....it started with dino....but for the last 10K +/- has been with some of the best synthetics available (PP and M1) both of which have great reputations as oils that 'clean'. Based on those facts, that engine might have had issues with dino (especially at 7K to 8K OCI's)....but the use of high quality synthetics....might have cleaned it up. Just my opinion.


can I have some of that cool aid?


2015 Grand Caravan 3.6L - 31k miles.
2006 Mazda 3 2.0L - 171k miles
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2636150
05/25/12 05:57 PM
05/25/12 05:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,003
Dallas,Tx USA
aquariuscsm Online content
aquariuscsm  Online Content

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,003
Dallas,Tx USA
I`m going back to dino more than likely. GTX and/or Valvoline.


1996 Nissan 300ZX 5-speed,Arctic Pearl(#175 of 300)
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30
2012 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L 2.4,auto,San Marino Red
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2636627
05/26/12 08:01 AM
05/26/12 08:01 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,499
ROCHESTER, NY
Char Baby Offline
Char Baby  Offline

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,499
ROCHESTER, NY
IMOH, Honda engines are not hard on oil. I opened up my old Accord due to leaking oil pan and valve cover gasket and @ 300K miles I couldn't believe how clean it was at both ends. On dino oil all it's life too!


"Retired"
-----------------------------------

'80 Firebird FORMULA V8/4bbl-purchased "NEW"
'15 Nissan Altima 2.5 SV
'15 Honda Civic 1.8 LX
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2636639
05/26/12 08:14 AM
05/26/12 08:14 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 753
MA
k24a4 Offline
k24a4  Offline

Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 753
MA
Thanks for the post, Hokiefyd. How did you learn to do the adjustment? Online? Book? My '04 Accord K24 has over 100k miles now. I should check the valves. Never done it before. Easy, hard?


Show the world you give a shift! Save the manuals!

'04 Accord I4 EX 5-MT 192000mi PU 5w-20 SM P1
'93 Miata 5-MT 125450mi PPP SN 5w-30 P1


Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: k24a4] #2636792
05/26/12 12:12 PM
05/26/12 12:12 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Originally Posted By: k24a4
Thanks for the post, Hokiefyd. How did you learn to do the adjustment? Online? Book? My '04 Accord K24 has over 100k miles now. I should check the valves. Never done it before. Easy, hard?


I have an alldatadiy.com account. It's pretty much a carbon copy of the service manual, so all the stuff is in there. PM me, and I can help you out with the instructions. It wasn't difficult, but because the engine is slanted backwards in the engine bay, the exhaust valves were harder to reach and gauge.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2637277
05/27/12 06:30 AM
05/27/12 06:30 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
I ran the car around after I adjusted the valves, and there didn't seem to be any difference in the cold-start noise or light chatter this engine seems to make. However, yesterday morning I drained out the Mobil 1 AFE 0W-20 and poured in my free (from BITOG Q&A session rebate) Valvoline MaxLife NextGen 5W-20 and I can say that there's a marked difference in the volume of the chatter from this cold motor. You can still kind of hear it if you're listening for it, but it sounds to be very muted. The oil almost "feels" thicker in the throttle pedal, but I must say, we went on a 200 mile trip yesterday afternoon to Wilmington and back and I got 29.6 mpg on the trip. That's the best I've ever done in this vehicle, and well above its 26 mpg highway rating. So I'll be watching in-town mpg closely to see if it's commensurate with what I achieved before on the M1 0W-20. If so, I may continue with this oil. I had plans to switch to PYB, but this VMLNG seems to be the real deal.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2637321
05/27/12 08:35 AM
05/27/12 08:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,474
Florida
Artem Offline
Artem  Offline

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,474
Florida
Thanks for the update, i stocked up on like 30 quarts of NextGen during various FAR deals over the past several months and i've yet to use it.


2014 Mazda 3 Hatch 2.0L & 6spd - Idemitsu 0w20 Synthetic @ $0.75 a quart. (thanks Advance Auto Parts for the awesome deal)
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2637341
05/27/12 09:09 AM
05/27/12 09:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 31,408
NJ
buster Offline
buster  Offline

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 31,408
NJ
Quote:
It seems to be the quietest on the M1 AFE.


I have the same engine. M1 0w20 SN was the best in terms of engine noise level. Extremely quiet.

In the cold, this engine tends to make a bit of noise. M1 0w20 took that away.

Engine looks really good. Valvoline makes good oil for shorter drain intervals. Wear protection is excellent.


2015 Mazda 3 2.0 - Mobil 1 EP 0w20
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2936617
03/12/13 03:38 PM
03/12/13 03:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,057
Chicago, IL
Brybo86 Offline
Brybo86  Offline

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,057
Chicago, IL
thanks for posting the nice pics, I have a 2008 accord 2.4 k24z3 with 70k miles which i believe looks the same under the valve cover as your CRV. I am trying to decide if i should pop the valve cover off or not. the thing is the more i read about adjusting valves the more i think i hear "noisy valves" ha


08 Honda Accord EX-L 2.4L M1 EP 0w20 153k
01 Kymco People 50
95 Lexus LS400 M1 AFE 0w30 199k
95 Yamaha Jog
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Oregoonian] #2936755
03/12/13 05:46 PM
03/12/13 05:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,115
new york
ottotheclown Offline
ottotheclown  Offline

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,115
new york
Yes nothing like coolreading into things to make it work for me. The white bottle worked fine the syn worked fine and neither was better than the other and that's the truth but it hurts a wee bit.
Originally Posted By: Oregoonian
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Originally Posted By: Oregoonian
Originally Posted By: aquariuscsm
Valvoline dino seems to keep engines really clean.


The last three OCI were SYNTHETIC.....not dino....PP 5w20 and M-1 0w20.

Since we haven't seen the engine with just dino....we could conclude that.... SYNTHETIC seems to keep engines really clean.





**Oil history: Valvoline white bottle from the dealer at intervals specified by the maintenance minder (about 7-8k miles each), from new until when I bought it with about 45,000 miles*

^^From the op`s first post. Re-read it in it`s entirety please,unless you`re suggesting that 10,000 miles of pseudo-syn and syn cleaned up his severely sludged-ruined by VWB dino engine?


Not suggesting that at all! But....it started with dino....but for the last 10K +/- has been with some of the best synthetics available (PP and M1) both of which have great reputations as oils that 'clean'. Based on those facts, that engine might have had issues with dino (especially at 7K to 8K OCI's)....but the use of high quality synthetics....might have cleaned it up. Just my opinion.


ottotheclown
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2937270
03/13/13 08:05 AM
03/13/13 08:05 AM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,735
Miami-Dade County
CROWNVIC4LIFE Offline
CROWNVIC4LIFE  Offline

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,735
Miami-Dade County
That is one nice clean engine! Thanks for posting!


05 Ford Crown Vic
5W20 Motorcraft Full Synthetic
Bosh D3410 Filter

07 Merc Grand Marquis
5W20 Motorcraft Full Synthetic
Motorcraft Filter.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: TomYoung] #2937876
03/13/13 06:37 PM
03/13/13 06:37 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 99
NY
DinoOil Offline
DinoOil  Offline

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 99
NY
Originally Posted By: TomYoung
Congrats on clean engine, but this disassembly at this low mileage on a functioning unit is not really merited...


Right. The OP should display such an exhibit at approximately 200K miles. Let's see what it's like then.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2937905
03/13/13 07:03 PM
03/13/13 07:03 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,386
North Texas
ARB1977 Offline
ARB1977  Offline

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,386
North Texas
Even with the current fill its a little noisy but not too bad. Next fill will be with PP 5W20 with a purlator synthetic filter. At some point I need to change the valve cover gasket on the Tacoma. Be sure to take pictures of the inside.


2015 Tacoma 4.0L 60K (as of 02/23/18)
AMSOIL SS 0W30 / Toyota filter

2018 CRV 1.5L (as of 05/11/18)
Factory fill / Honda filter
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2937932
03/13/13 07:36 PM
03/13/13 07:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 520
SW Fla
dernp Offline
dernp  Offline

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 520
SW Fla
Well done. Thanks for posting.


2014 Honda Civic 1.8 28k TGMO 0w20
2016 Honda Civic 1.5T Mobil 1 0w20
2011 Tundra 5.7L 83k TGMO


Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: DinoOil] #2937935
03/13/13 07:38 PM
03/13/13 07:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,202
Southeast Texas
gfh77665 Offline
gfh77665  Offline

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,202
Southeast Texas
Originally Posted By: DinoOil
Originally Posted By: TomYoung
Congrats on clean engine, but this disassembly at this low mileage on a functioning unit is not really merited...


Right. The OP should display such an exhibit at approximately 200K miles. Let's see what it's like then.


This. ^^^

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2937945
03/13/13 07:49 PM
03/13/13 07:49 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,475
Morris County NJ
steve20 Offline
steve20  Offline

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,475
Morris County NJ
Thank you for posting-and appreciate the pictures. I have the same engine in my 05 Accord. Valves were adjusted for the first time last month at 180K. No diff in cold weather clatter.
I beg to differ on your assessment of cam lobe condition---and offer my opinion only as that, my opinion, not to argue with you. After 101K miles on 5-20 I switched over to 5-30 because my lobes were starting to take on the appearance of yours. They never quite got to where yours are at, but I didn't want to be replacing cams at 200K when it is not a good financial move. I am happy with the 5-30 and do not ever plan to go back to any 20 weight in this car. For me, QSUD has been the loudest oil--cold as well as warm---contrary to the current thinking of high Boron being a 'quieting' remedy



Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: steve20] #2937948
03/13/13 07:56 PM
03/13/13 07:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40,150
Ontario, Canada
OVERKILL Offline
OVERKILL  Offline

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40,150
Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: steve20
Thank you for posting-and appreciate the pictures. I have the same engine in my 05 Accord. Valves were adjusted for the first time last month at 180K. No diff in cold weather clatter.
I beg to differ on your assessment of cam lobe condition---and offer my opinion only as that, my opinion, not to argue with you. After 101K miles on 5-20 I switched over to 5-30 because my lobes were starting to take on the appearance of yours. They never quite got to where yours are at, but I didn't want to be replacing cams at 200K when it is not a good financial move. I am happy with the 5-30 and do not ever plan to go back to any 20 weight in this car. For me, QSUD has been the loudest oil--cold as well as warm---contrary to the current thinking of high Boron being a 'quieting' remedy


If it is a roller motor, why would you be replacing cams? The cams will likely outlive the rest of the engine.


2019 RAM 1500 Sport - Mobil 1 EP 0w-20, FRAM Ultra
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT - Ravenol SSL 0w-40, FRAM Ultra
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: steve20] #2938219
03/14/13 06:11 AM
03/14/13 06:11 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Originally Posted By: steve20
Thank you for posting-and appreciate the pictures. I have the same engine in my 05 Accord. Valves were adjusted for the first time last month at 180K. No diff in cold weather clatter.
I beg to differ on your assessment of cam lobe condition---and offer my opinion only as that, my opinion, not to argue with you. After 101K miles on 5-20 I switched over to 5-30 because my lobes were starting to take on the appearance of yours. They never quite got to where yours are at, but I didn't want to be replacing cams at 200K when it is not a good financial move. I am happy with the 5-30 and do not ever plan to go back to any 20 weight in this car. For me, QSUD has been the loudest oil--cold as well as warm---contrary to the current thinking of high Boron being a 'quieting' remedy


I go back and forth between a 20 grade and a 30 grade, in terms of what I will use next. It has Mobil 1 0W-30 in it now. Whether this is a more appropriate oil for the engine compared with a 20 grade, I don't know.

I don't believe there are problems with the cam lobes. The "grooves" you see on the cam lobes are more like "witness lines" than "wear grooves". They cannot be felt at all. Could you measure wear with a micrometer? Probably. But although they appear to be "grooved", it's just the way the flash from the camera makes them appear. The picture was taken with an older smartphone in my garage, so lighting was poor.

I am interested in your assessment of which oils have run quietest and loudest in this engine. This K24 has been the most sensitive engine I've owned to oil selection, in terms of engine noise. Most engines I've owned have sounded the same, regardless of the oil in the sump. But this one is definitely louder or quieter on certain oils. I'm interested to hear what your experience has been.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2938271
03/14/13 08:03 AM
03/14/13 08:03 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,902
Louisiana
BrianWC Offline
BrianWC  Offline

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,902
Louisiana
When this thread was originally posted, I was just 20 days past buying a new Si with the k24z7 engine. Within the lifespan of the factory fill, my cam lobes looked the exact same way. I've since run heavier oils, usually a franken-mix of whatever I have on the shelves of my aging stash, and the cam lobes have not gotten any worse. So perhaps the cams are allowed to get those lines on the very outer surface but nothing beyond???

I've similarly run whatever oil was closest in my '02 CR-V for probably ten of the eleven years I've owned it (ran M1 5W30 the first) and it's still motoring along.


2002 Honda CR-V EX AWD
2018 Volkswagen Atlas SEL-P 4Motion
2018 Volkswagen GTI S
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: BrianWC] #2938338
03/14/13 09:19 AM
03/14/13 09:19 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40,150
Ontario, Canada
OVERKILL Offline
OVERKILL  Offline

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 40,150
Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: BrianWC
When this thread was originally posted, I was just 20 days past buying a new Si with the k24z7 engine. Within the lifespan of the factory fill, my cam lobes looked the exact same way. I've since run heavier oils, usually a franken-mix of whatever I have on the shelves of my aging stash, and the cam lobes have not gotten any worse. So perhaps the cams are allowed to get those lines on the very outer surface but nothing beyond???

I've similarly run whatever oil was closest in my '02 CR-V for probably ten of the eleven years I've owned it (ran M1 5W30 the first) and it's still motoring along.


It is completely normal for there to be a "track" where the roller follows the lobe (in a roller valvetrain application). You won't be able to feel it with your finger, but its presence is expected given the finish on the lobe itself after it has been ground. As the lubricated wheel acts against the slightly irregularly finished surface, the surface becomes less irregular and these "tracks" are just the result of that.

Depending on how shiny the finish was on the lobe when it was made will determine how visible this characteristic is.

To demonstrate how harmless this is, I've had the valve covers off a Modular that was extremely low mileage (my buddy's 02 GT) and where the roller followed the lobe was visible. I also had the valve covers off a Crown Vic with north of 400,000Km on it at the wreckers and it had the same tracks. No better, no worse smile

Even in applications with much higher valve spring pressure (relatively speaking here) like my 302's, the 2nd of which had the factory cam in it until ~312,000Km, the finish on the cam was "like new". But you could still see where the roller lifters followed the cam profile on the lobes.


2019 RAM 1500 Sport - Mobil 1 EP 0w-20, FRAM Ultra
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT - Ravenol SSL 0w-40, FRAM Ultra
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2938386
03/14/13 10:07 AM
03/14/13 10:07 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,902
Louisiana
BrianWC Offline
BrianWC  Offline

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,902
Louisiana
Right and I hope I didn't mean to make my post look anti-20 weight or anything. Really I was just pointing out that regardless of the quality of the oil, my two k24's seem to take it in stride.


2002 Honda CR-V EX AWD
2018 Volkswagen Atlas SEL-P 4Motion
2018 Volkswagen GTI S
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: OVERKILL] #2938392
03/14/13 10:13 AM
03/14/13 10:13 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
It is completely normal for there to be a "track" where the roller follows the lobe (in a roller valvetrain application). You won't be able to feel it with your finger, but its presence is expected given the finish on the lobe itself after it has been ground. As the lubricated wheel acts against the slightly irregularly finished surface, the surface becomes less irregular and these "tracks" are just the result of that.


Additionally, the surface of the roller follower wheel will not be absolutely perfectly flat, or likely absolutely perfectly parallel with the surface of the cam lobe...at least initially. So witness lines like these will naturally form as each individual roller follower wheel and lobe wear-in together (also as noted by BrianWC above). The witness lines will appear quickly as the wear-in occurs, and cause no harm for hundreds of thousands of miles.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2938481
03/14/13 11:39 AM
03/14/13 11:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,149
Brickerville, PA
afoulk Offline
afoulk  Offline

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,149
Brickerville, PA
We see these same marks on the cam lobes of Macks MP series engines at work. When these engines first came out, we questioned Mack about it and they soon released a bulletin stating that this was normal and was only cause for concern if you could feel them with your finger nail. For what its worth to anyone.


2012 Toyota RAV4 2.5L AWD
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2938894
03/14/13 06:06 PM
03/14/13 06:06 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Scout1 Offline
Scout1  Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Hey, I'm the poster boy for cold valve clatter on these engines and trying everything to eliminate it. The engines are so nice and quiet otherwise so the cold "clatter" drove me nuts. I've tried lots of different oils and I've adjusted the valves 3 times trying to figure it out.

The car is a 2004 Accord 2.4L manual. I'm the original owner and I ran it during the warranty on GTX 5/20. Then when I switched to PU 5/30 (yeah, I'm one of those 30 weight guys) but then I noticed for the first time the dreaded cold clatter. Never noticed it on the GTX so yes I deserve flaming for changing to 30 wt! So I opened it up (should have taken pictures but it was nice and clean) and adjusted the valves to spec. Guess what, no difference, still cold clatter!

It had to be valve clatter so I opened it up again and set all the valves slightly tight and guess what? No clatter! Just a gnawing sensation that I'm burning valves (hey, there's gotta be some tolerence there, right... right?). I couldn't take it any longer so after a while I opened it up again and very very carefully set each valve exactly at it's minimum clearance. The clatter was back but not as bad. So it's definitely valve clearance making the noise on this engine.

So what I've found this past year is PYB (SN) 5/30 is the ticket to quiet this clatter (maybe the Moly?) Very quiet running in all phases including cold! I do notice the cold clatter starts coming back at around 4k to 5k miles on the change. Fresh oil, the clatter goes away again. I'm on my 3rd change with PYB. With min clearances on the valves, I'll need to adjust more frequently but it's fairly easy on this engine although as one poster said, it's a bit hard to get the feeler gauge on some of the valves.

By the way, I've tried GC 0w30, M1 5/30, Napa 5/30 full synthetic (that was pretty quiet... for a while!), PP 5/30 and PU 5/30 which was probably the worst in terms of cold clatter. All didn't help the cold clatter like the PYB. So I'm a believer... Now what am I gonna do with all this other oil in my stash? Oh yeah, the other five cars, the two motorcycles, my kids who come home for oil changes, their girlfriends cars... wink


Scout1
Truth will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2938904
03/14/13 06:16 PM
03/14/13 06:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 32,478
NY
demarpaint Offline
demarpaint  Offline

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 32,478
NY
Nice and clean. Stick with what you're currently using, along with the interval, it is serving you well.


God Bless Our Troops

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2938935
03/14/13 06:34 PM
03/14/13 06:34 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,280
SunnySouthFlorida
KitaCam Offline
KitaCam  Offline

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,280
SunnySouthFlorida
Re: Scout...

Like your Accord: PYB 5w-30 ran a quiet I4/2.4 Camry
...running PP 5w-30 is even quieter...

Diff'rent ols fer diff'rent strokes (as the song goes, perhaps), but thought I'd pass this on to ya anyway...


Kitacam is an 05 Camry LE/I4/MT; latest OC: 2/17 @ 142,300....PP 5w-30 with Toyo filter
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: KitaCam] #2938962
03/14/13 07:00 PM
03/14/13 07:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Scout1 Offline
Scout1  Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
You know, you're right... when the engine is warm PP is absolutely the quietest, but PP was far noisier when the engine was cold and that was my issue...

I'm using PP 10/30 in my BMW Z4 and it is very quiet compared to the GC I was running before.


Scout1
Truth will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2939020
03/14/13 08:00 PM
03/14/13 08:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
I'm not the only one then.

PYB does run quiet in my engine. I used the 5W-20 variety; I'm sure the 5W-30 would be quiet as well. The PP and PU oils were much louder for me. I never could figure it out. But PYB was good.

I've also found M1's AFE line to be very quiet. Probably quieter even than PYB. I've used 0W-20 before, and I have 0W-30 in it now. It's a toss-up on whether I'll go back to 0W-20 next time.

I'd be interested to hear if your engine is as quiet as mine is on M1 0W-30 if you decide to try that some time.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2940325
03/16/13 07:36 AM
03/16/13 07:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Scout1 Offline
Scout1  Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Hi Hokiefyd,
I forgot to mention it in my first post, but I did try a run of M1 0w30 AFE when it first came out. Worked OK, but not nearly as quiet as the PYB, I still heard the cold clatter.

I sort of suspect the high moly in the PYB is what's actually doing the trick since the PP and PU don't have the same level, nor does the M1 AFE. I guess a way to prove that would be to fill up with a low or no Moly oil (Valvoline perhaps) and then throw a bottle of LM MOS2 additive in and see if it quiets down. Hummm... I might try that sometime.


Scout1
Truth will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Scout1] #2940336
03/16/13 07:54 AM
03/16/13 07:54 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Scout1 Offline
Scout1  Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
By the way, remember I'm running my valves at minimum clearances so it will be a bit nosier with a normal valve adjustment which will allow some valves to be towards the upper tolerance. I'm also pretty sure the noise is coming from the exhaust values which have the greatest clearance (obviously!). They are to the back and the noise comes right through the firewall.

It's interesting to hear a much louder tink tink on these exhaust valves when you hand manipulate the clearance, they really have a pretty wide clearance. Whatever metal Honda chose, they needed a lot of thermal expansion allowance. Perhaps the exhausts just run really hot on these engines due to the extra lean burn system (two O2 sensors). Donno.


Scout1
Truth will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2940349
03/16/13 08:24 AM
03/16/13 08:24 AM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,224
Houston, TX
Coprolite Offline
Coprolite  Offline

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,224
Houston, TX
If you obsess about engine noise that much, have you thought about improving the sound insulation on the vehicle? I started to look into that with my G37 due to the low profile tire noise. Priorities changed(more like waking to reality) and I ended up changing cars to a much quieter F150.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Coprolite] #2940417
03/16/13 09:36 AM
03/16/13 09:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Scout1 Offline
Scout1  Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Ha ha... show me a guy on this forum who isn't obsessed! Otherwise we'd all be going to Jiffy Lube! I donno, even if I could figure out how to insulate things better, usually you still hear the noise and know what it is... would still make me want to try and fix it! I've been accused of being a perfectionist in the past...

I used to have a friend who said, "If my car starts making noise, I just turn up the radio a bit" :-)


Scout1
Truth will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2940442
03/16/13 10:08 AM
03/16/13 10:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,149
Brickerville, PA
afoulk Offline
afoulk  Offline

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,149
Brickerville, PA
My scion (2azfe) seems to work the opposite way. Its runs fairly quiet when cold, but once hot, my valve tick starts to get worse. any thoughts on that? Its definitely coming from the top end, and its not the injectors. I would think as the engine heats up, things would expand and the clearance would get smaller, reducing the noise, as it seems to in your Hondas. And it does seem to quiet down somewhat depending on what oil I use, haven't tried pyb yet though. QSUD hadn't seemed to help much, which kinda counteracts most peoples experiences here. For those who don't know, the 2azfe is a cam on bucket design, don't know if that changes things any, although I don't see why it would


2012 Toyota RAV4 2.5L AWD
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Coprolite] #2940506
03/16/13 11:24 AM
03/16/13 11:24 AM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 99
NY
DinoOil Offline
DinoOil  Offline

Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 99
NY
Originally Posted By: Coprolite
If you obsess about engine noise that much, have you thought about improving the sound insulation on the vehicle? I started to look into that with my G37 due to the low profile tire noise. Priorities changed(more like waking to reality) and I ended up changing cars to a much quieter F150.


I agree. A little too much OCD and whatever other maladies and afflictions plague some around here. I think a low dose of Paxil would help some here.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: afoulk] #2940550
03/16/13 12:22 PM
03/16/13 12:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Scout1 Offline
Scout1  Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Yeah, that's strange although seems there are a lot of complaints on valve-train noise on these Toyota engines. Sounds like it's a viscosity thing, as the oil heats up and thins out you get more noise than when it's cold and thick. Valve adjustments on those engines look pretty awful with the cam removal and new buckets required to adjust! Since the cam lobe rides directly on the bucket, wonder if a really high HTHS oil might quiet it down? Donno if you're against 30 wts, but GC 0w30 might be the ticket!


Scout1
Truth will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2940719
03/16/13 03:28 PM
03/16/13 03:28 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
Hokiefyd Offline OP
Hokiefyd  Offline OP

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 14,505
Top of Virginia
I understand the SM version of Mobil 1's AFE wasn't as quiet as the newer SN version of it. Many folks have commented on how quiet their engines are on the SN AFE. I haven't used the SM version, so I couldn't compare. I did run PYB 5W-20 directly before this run of M1 0W-30. Cold start was about the same (very good). The PYB was a little louder when warmed-up, though. That could be the difference in grade, though.

On a prior oil change, I had five quarts of PP 0W-20 in it, and as you know, the engine is awfully rattly on that oil. I drained one quart out and put in one quart of M1 0W-40 and the noise was MUCH quieter. About as quiet as it is now. I don't know whether it's the viscosity, the moly, some other additive, etc. But it is an interesting experiment.

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2940971
03/16/13 07:42 PM
03/16/13 07:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,475
Morris County NJ
steve20 Offline
steve20  Offline

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,475
Morris County NJ
Hey Jason
Past oil experience with the K24 in the 05 Accord

0-101,000 miles my own syn blend of 3 qts GTX & 1.5 qt Syntec both 5-20. Seemed to bet he quietest blend I've used, but also the dirtiest in terms of smut visible thru the fill opening

102,000-140,000 miles my own syn blend of 3.5 qts PYB & 1.5 qt PP both 5-30 not as quiet as the GTX

140,000-177,000 miles either straight PYB in the summer or straight PP in the winter both 30 weights. No more syn blending. The PP seems to be the loudest cold & hot, PYB much quieter.

177,000-182,000 QSUD 5-30-clatter turned into a different sound, a quieter but more constant than a ticking when cold-I do not particularly care for this oil in this car, but I've got at least 25 quarts of it. It has started to clean the Castrol smut left in the valve cover. I would say my under my vc is about, or just slightly better than the way your's looks today

You can hear a cold 4 cyl Honda start in a cold parking lot from 100 yards away, so in the end I would think we'll never solve the cold clatter with different oils, but PYB has worked best,----- the higher cST when cold does not impress. The PYB 5-30 is almost as thick as PYB 10-30. When the new PZL Blend goes on special I'll probably pick up an oil change worth, just to try it
Thanks again for the pics, and the description of how the second intake valve mechanism works, I never knew about the 2200 rpm switch over
Steve



Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2940976
03/16/13 07:49 PM
03/16/13 07:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 14,240
Illinois
tig1 Offline
tig1  Offline

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 14,240
Illinois
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
I understand the SM version of Mobil 1's AFE wasn't as quiet as the newer SN version of it. Many folks have commented on how quiet their engines are on the SN AFE. I haven't used the SM version, so I couldn't compare. I did run PYB 5W-20 directly before this run of M1 0W-30. Cold start was about the same (very good). The PYB was a little louder when warmed-up, though. That could be the difference in grade, though.

On a prior oil change, I had five quarts of PP 0W-20 in it, and as you know, the engine is awfully rattly on that oil. I drained one quart out and put in one quart of M1 0W-40 and the noise was MUCH quieter. About as quiet as it is now. I don't know whether it's the viscosity, the moly, some other additive, etc. But it is an interesting experiment.


I ran many OCIs with both SM and SN M1 0-20(probably more than most any other Bitoger). Saw no differance in performance between the two at 10K OCIs.

Last edited by tig1; 03/16/13 07:51 PM.

2007 Ford Fusion 245,000 miles
M1 5-20HM
2017 Ford Fusion 73K
M1 0-20EP
10,000 mile OCIs on both engines
M1 ATF and Valvoline LV
M1 10-30 in all OPE
MC filters

Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: Hokiefyd] #2941338
03/17/13 08:57 AM
03/17/13 08:57 AM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 248
Michigan
mr_diy Offline
mr_diy  Offline

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 248
Michigan
Has anyone here compared the sound level with Honda oil?
It seems that the sound is from the cams and rockers until the valves heat up and the gap closes. A side effect of not having hydraulic lash adjusters. If this is the case, thicker oil may help quiet the sound, but what is the downside elsewhere, and are there any reason the sound should be a concern other than a nuisance?


98 Toyota Sienna 155k, 18-26mpg, 21avg
13 Honda Civic 12k, 28-45mpg, 34avg
Re: Under a CR-V's valve cover [Re: mr_diy] #2941392
03/17/13 10:01 AM
03/17/13 10:01 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Scout1 Offline
Scout1  Offline

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 421
Seattle WA
Originally Posted By: mr_diy
Has anyone here compared the sound level with Honda oil?
It seems that the sound is from the cams and rockers until the valves heat up and the gap closes. A side effect of not having hydraulic lash adjusters. If this is the case, thicker oil may help quiet the sound, but what is the downside elsewhere, and are there any reason the sound should be a concern other than a nuisance?


In 2003, Honda had a camshaft issue that led to premature pitting and galling of the lobes on the exhaust cams in particular. So the cold ticking might make that problem show up sooner. Later years I think have been OK, so it's mostly a nuisance I think. Haven't tried any Honda oil in the 04, but I'll be running Honda oil in my 2013. The new motor has a completely different head with the direct injection and integrated exhaust manifold... it even switches the cross flow direction with the exhaust now on the front. The new engine does seem a lot louder than the 04 but I think that might be the DI?


Scout1
Truth will always bear up against falsehood, as oil does above water
Page 1 of 5 1 2 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™