Recent Topics
liquimoly diesel purge
by nyumski
14 minutes 33 seconds ago
Castrol 0w40 vs Motul XCess 8100 5w40 base oil
by NocturnalG
Today at 01:39 AM
Finding My Biological Father
by john_pifer
Today at 12:15 AM
Engine Oi Tips for all buddies out here
by kestrelong
Yesterday at 11:52 PM
Virgin Napa Pro Select 21522
by Farmer
Yesterday at 11:45 PM
Virgin Napa Gold 1348
by Farmer
Yesterday at 11:43 PM
Virgin Napa Pro Select 27145
by Farmer
Yesterday at 11:41 PM
Wix 57145, 268 Hours
by Farmer
Yesterday at 11:40 PM
Forester XT filter ok on Tribeca?
by dx92beater
Yesterday at 11:08 PM
Speedometer problems
by SEMI_287
Yesterday at 11:02 PM
06 Tribeca B9 with H6 engine, 161 k miles
by dx92beater
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Proline (Pepboys) Oil Filter: Who Makes Them?
by THafeez
Yesterday at 10:46 PM
Newest Members
Sonja, petroff, RX300, PCWW, Reo4ua
59181 Registered Users
Who's Online
31 registered (4WD, B320i, bandz7, 1foxracing, billt460, bmod305, 4 invisible), 841 Guests and 15 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59181 Members
66 Forums
254901 Topics
4186550 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#2543552 - 02/21/12 08:21 AM U.S. oil production
hillclimber Offline


Registered: 10/01/06
Posts: 440
Loc: Alexandria, VA
http://www.chron.com/business/article/U-S-oil-gusher-blows-out-projections-3341919.php

among other interesting tidbits: Including those in natural gas fields, the United States now has more rigs at work than the entire rest of the world.
_________________________
2007 Lexus ES350

Top
#2543614 - 02/21/12 09:59 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
wallyuwl Offline


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 1651
Loc: Lexington, KY
And think about how much more we could produce now and in the future if more of Alaska, and coastal waters, were opened up. And without the deep water embargo after the BP spill.

Top
#2543673 - 02/21/12 11:15 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: wallyuwl]
Doog Offline


Registered: 10/24/11
Posts: 6009
Loc: North Coast
Originally Posted By: wallyuwl
And think about how much more we could produce now and in the future if more of Alaska, and coastal waters, were opened up. And without the deep water embargo after the BP spill.


+1 or a pipeline from Canada which has somehow disappeared...
_________________________
The difference between a beer and your opinion is that I asked for a beer... well except for just now..Coffee2

Top
#2543695 - 02/21/12 11:34 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Doog]
wallyuwl Offline


Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 1651
Loc: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted By: Doog
Originally Posted By: wallyuwl
And think about how much more we could produce now and in the future if more of Alaska, and coastal waters, were opened up. And without the deep water embargo after the BP spill.


+1 or a pipeline from Canada which has somehow disappeared...


It will reappear........... In Vancouver. In four years. Like magic.

Top
#2544515 - 02/21/12 11:30 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: wallyuwl]
fsskier Offline


Registered: 07/22/08
Posts: 807
Loc: Iowa
Long article in the Omaha, Nebraska newspaper quoted the Governor as saying: this would have been resolved if congress had stayed out of it. The pipeline builder had agreed to correct the design and route issues..... then congress tried to make a political football out of it and force it down our throats......so the pipeline interests held off to see what happened. With the rejection now complete, they are rapidly making corrections and it seems construction is likely to begin in a year.

It will NOT go west through the Canadian mountains.... opposition is intense there.

Top
#2611430 - 04/27/12 02:50 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
Al Offline


Registered: 06/08/02
Posts: 16561
Loc: Elizabethtown, Pa
Pumping more is not the answer..we already gobble up 25% of the world's energy with only 5% of people. People that want us to pump more, use more, and hammer Speculators are missing the point.
_________________________

Top
#2611525 - 04/27/12 05:03 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Al]
Tempest Offline


Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 10600
Loc: Las Vegas NV
Originally Posted By: Al
Pumping more is not the answer..we already gobble up 25% of the world's energy with only 5% of people. People that want us to pump more, use more, and hammer Speculators are missing the point.

Then what is the point? Use less energy in the name of global fairness?
_________________________
“Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.” --- Henry Rosovsky

Top
#2611604 - 04/27/12 06:50 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 33912
Loc: Oz
I'm starting to agree with Tempest on oil...

Use it all up now, and get back to horse and buggies.

Top
#2611654 - 04/27/12 07:31 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
addyguy Offline


Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 13975
Loc: Canada
Excdept with how large and spead-out modern society is, horse and buggy would NOT work.

When the world runs out of readily-accesible oil, you will start to see a massive drop in world population, due to starvation.

You cannot produce and transport the amount of food needed to feed the world today without petroleum power....you simply can't.
_________________________
2010 Kia Soul 2U - 2.0L I-4, auto, 89k miles.
MM Supreme 5W-30; QS 14612 filter.

Top
#2611777 - 04/27/12 09:26 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
Shannow Online   content


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 33912
Loc: Oz
Precisely
Which is why we may as well get it over with
_________________________
2003 Navara 3.0Di - Edge 5W30/25W50
1997 Caprice L67 - Magnatec Stop Start 10W30

Top
#2611885 - 04/28/12 12:15 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Al]
tgferg67 Offline


Registered: 03/23/05
Posts: 199
Loc: Michigan
Originally Posted By: Al
Pumping more is not the answer..we already gobble up 25% of the world's energy with only 5% of people. People that want us to pump more, use more, and hammer Speculators are missing the point.


And alot of the worlds population produce nothing other than babies and live in mud huts.
_________________________
2003 Pontiac Vibe (1ZZ-FE auto) 200k
Pennzoil dino

Top
#2612040 - 04/28/12 09:01 AM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Tempest]
Al Offline


Registered: 06/08/02
Posts: 16561
Loc: Elizabethtown, Pa
Originally Posted By: Tempest
Originally Posted By: Al
Pumping more is not the answer..we already gobble up 25% of the world's energy with only 5% of people. People that want us to pump more, use more, and hammer Speculators are missing the point.

Then what is the point? Use less energy in the name of global fairness?
Not really about Global Fairness" its about common sense. There is no way our [censored] of energy is sustainable. Look at where our unsustainable debt and our lack of any type of common sense policy that makes this Country a sustainable entity going forward.


Much of the world's developing economies (that actually produce things) will be competing for energy and be able to afford more while we can afford less. But I digress. We will keep gobbling til there is nothing to gobble.


Edited by Al (04/28/12 09:02 AM)
_________________________

Top
#2614333 - 04/30/12 10:04 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: hillclimber]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 17456
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Quote:
Look at where our unsustainable debt


And who created that debt and reduced this country's oil supply in the name of forcing consumption of alternative energies NOT developed or cost effective?
_________________________
I dropped a helium balloon and a brick and they did not hit the ground at the same time. So much for that theory. smile


Top
#2614338 - 04/30/12 10:08 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: Al]
JHZR2 Offline



Registered: 12/14/02
Posts: 38474
Loc: New Jersey
Originally Posted By: Al
We will keep gobbling til there is nothing to gobble.


People will take a dump in their drinking water supply if it is convenient. The most convenient thing is to do nothing and pump more.

The issue is that if one entity does it unilaterally, it hurts, because there are ten others willing to just do what is convenient and cheapest. Im not talking from a central planning point of view or anything, but rather from a worldwide usage point of view.

Top
#2614793 - 05/01/12 12:23 PM Re: U.S. oil production [Re: addyguy]
Tempest Offline


Registered: 03/21/06
Posts: 10600
Loc: Las Vegas NV
Originally Posted By: addyguy
Excdept with how large and spead-out modern society is, horse and buggy would NOT work.

When the world runs out of readily-accesible oil, you will start to see a massive drop in world population, due to starvation.

You cannot produce and transport the amount of food needed to feed the world today without petroleum power....you simply can't.

If that is the case, then you would agree that chasing the "green energy" panacea is a huge waste of time and material?

This is a highly simplistic view of how the world works and shows a lack of understand of markets. Just a few decades ago, "experts" were claiming that the max population of the world was 2 billion and there would be starvations, higher prices for commodities, blah, blah...just as you predict. Obviously, they were wrong.

If the market is allowed to work, and fossil fuels actually begin to run out, then they will become more expensive and other alternatives will become more affordable and replace them. This is the history of mankind, when allowed by their overseers.

And remember, the supply of oil is largely dictated by the arbitrary actions of a few in governments, not the individual people that makeup the market.

Natural gas prices have plunged as of late due to new drilling techniques, which has greatly increased supply of a purportedly finite resources. The lesson of the story:

Drill baby drill works!
_________________________
“Never underestimate the difficulty of changing false beliefs by facts.” --- Henry Rosovsky

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >