Recent Topics
supertech dexron VI
by passgas55
03/27/17 09:24 PM
Looking for a good American made battery.
by 5AcresAndAFool
03/27/17 09:07 PM
Anyone gone back to a flip phone?
by radtech91
03/27/17 09:00 PM
emergency help button
by joaks
03/27/17 06:03 PM
Meeting new requirements
by Camprunner
03/27/17 05:56 PM
Unusual Filter Media
by George7941
03/27/17 05:50 PM
Valvoline syn power 0W40
by A1O
03/27/17 05:48 PM
2002 Lexus LS wash....
by gregk24
03/27/17 05:21 PM
Anyone else have their dog get Lime Disease?
by JimPghPA
03/27/17 04:45 PM
Arborist says NEVER "top" a tree
by Ed_Flecko
03/27/17 04:23 PM
Rotella T6 5w40, 3033 miles, 2013 Honda Civic Si
by cjsiege
03/27/17 04:19 PM
clutch diaphragm position
by mjoekingz28
03/27/17 04:07 PM
VWB 5w30, 5k OCI '16 F350 6.2l
by Doublehaul
03/27/17 03:44 PM
Does oil age if opened but not used?
by BrianApp
03/27/17 01:40 PM
need advice on a jeep wrangler for my kid
by PeterGreen
03/27/17 01:32 PM
J.D. Power: Michelin is #1
by SubLGT
03/27/17 01:10 PM
Opinion on tires for a 2012 vw jetta
by A1O
03/27/17 12:58 PM
MTF Fill Recommendation
by redhat
03/27/17 12:30 PM
Another doctor story
by HosteenJorje
03/27/17 12:08 PM
Older Mobil1 ATF in Dex 6 spec'd auto?
by Gasbuggy
03/27/17 11:45 AM
Newest Members
finklefan13, Hedgehodge, gsxrdude15, cguilbeau, Wrench5
61000 Registered Users
Who's Online
100 registered (4ever4d, 2cool, 77GrandPrix, 87sammy, 88m53453, 5AcresAndAFool, 13 invisible), 2353 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
61000 Members
66 Forums
262902 Topics
4340657 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Topic Options
#2510026 - 01/30/12 03:21 AM Automotive Bearing Parameters
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 35233
Loc: Oz
600+ pages of bearing sizes and clearances, from ACL, who make stuff for just about everyone.

General information

http://www.acl.com.au/web/acl00056.nsf/a...37?OpenDocument

The good guts

http://www.acl.com.au/web/aclwebsite.nsf...cb?OpenDocument
_________________________
2003 Navara 3.0Di - Edge 5W30/25W50
1997 Caprice L67 - Magnatec Stop Start 5W/30/Penrite SAE30

Top
#2533373 - 02/11/12 09:43 PM Re: Automotive Bearing Parameters [Re: Shannow]
GMorg Offline


Registered: 01/29/06
Posts: 2435
Loc: Mizzou-land
My question is a little off topic, but I don't know of better place in the formum to ask it. Are clearances now as tight as they can get for any of the bearing in an ICE? It seems that the machining has gotten to the point where clearances that account for thermal expansion are easily within the capabilities of mass production.

Top
#2533459 - 02/11/12 11:19 PM Re: Automotive Bearing Parameters [Re: Shannow]
Shannow Offline


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 35233
Loc: Oz
Always have been.

GM, and Rolls Royce used "select" fit for more than half a century.

Acknowledging that there are tolerances in manufacturing, manufacturers used to pick/make not quite to spec equipment, and assemble it to get the clearances that they were after.

There were bearings over and under dimension, 1/4 thou, 1/2 thou, 0.75, 1, 1.5 and 2, so the machining of the crank and bores could me matched exactly to the right bearing or piston to get exactly the clearance that was specified...and engine could have 8 different over/undersizes, and be "perfect".

Makes remanufacturing an engine difficult, when you have to "fit" parts together to get the best, or the best compromise.

The old ways delivered precision fit, at loose tolerances.

Japanese expect that parts are manufactured such that every piston can go into every block, way more expensive set-up,and it works most of the time in modern times.

I'd be surprised if clearances were that much better controlled than in the past...the SBC in my brother's 1969 Holden Premier still called for 5W-20, even 'thought there was no such available in Oz at the time.

Top
#2533673 - 02/12/12 09:03 AM Re: Automotive Bearing Parameters [Re: Shannow]
GMorg Offline


Registered: 01/29/06
Posts: 2435
Loc: Mizzou-land
From this perspective, the idea that tolerances are getting "tighter" has to end. You just aren't allowed to break the laws of physics.

Unless we find a way to formulate alloys that allow for compensatory thermal expansion that maintains a fixed distance between rings/races, then bearing "fit" cannot get any tighter.

If this is the case, bearing tolerances cannot continue to be used as an excuse for lower KV oils. I can accept that thinner can be "better", but I am having difficulty accepting that bearing clearances has anything to do with the "thin is in" trend.

Top
#2533685 - 02/12/12 09:23 AM Re: Automotive Bearing Parameters [Re: GMorg]
d00df00d Online   content


Registered: 10/20/05
Posts: 10422
Loc: PA
Clearances and tolerances are two different things. wink
_________________________
2011 Mazda RX-8 R3
Castrol GTX 5w-20

Top
#2533713 - 02/12/12 10:18 AM Re: Automotive Bearing Parameters [Re: Shannow]
GMorg Offline


Registered: 01/29/06
Posts: 2435
Loc: Mizzou-land
Agreed. But in the context of this forum, where "tolerances" is often used incorrectly, I tried to use the word as it is often used here. The two words, although not strictly interchangeable, are related. As tolerances decrease, or become tighter (as often referenced here), the range of clearances decreases (not the clearance, but the range). As the range decreases, the target specification for clearances can be decreased. In other words, if the tolerances are made tighter, the engines can be built tighter (smaller clearances).

Tolerance is a quality control description that uses dimensions to set limits.
Clearance is a dimension, the range of which can be set by tolerances.

Top
#2533788 - 02/12/12 11:24 AM Re: Automotive Bearing Parameters [Re: GMorg]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18154
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: GMorg
From this perspective, the idea that tolerances are getting "tighter" has to end. You just aren't allowed to break the laws of physics.

Unless we find a way to formulate alloys that allow for compensatory thermal expansion that maintains a fixed distance between rings/races, then bearing "fit" cannot get any tighter.

If this is the case, bearing tolerances cannot continue to be used as an excuse for lower KV oils. I can accept that thinner can be "better", but I am having difficulty accepting that bearing clearances has anything to do with the "thin is in" trend.


X2. No significant reduction in clearances, just tolerances are better managed.
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#2533914 - 02/12/12 12:55 PM Re: Automotive Bearing Parameters [Re: Shannow]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 17875
Loc: Iowegia - USA
Quote:
...bearing tolerances cannot continue to be used as an excuse for lower KV oils.


Where, here in Bitog and similar sites, or in automotive industry publications?

I agree, even with laser machining you will reach a limit on toleraces.

As for clearances I do think the clearances have decreased somewhat, but not to the point that lower KV oils could be used as a sole reason,

I think there have been three factors for the use of lower KV oils:

1. government mandates for better mpg,

2. better surface finishing resulting in less contact friction,

3. and the fact the lubrcants industry has met the challenge with lubricants that have better AW components, better friction modifiers, better anti-oxidants, better HTHS, and better base oils.


As a reminder, my dad's 1951 Buick straight-eight engine used 20W20 until it had to be rebuilt at 175,000 miles due to a failure unrelated to lubrication. And at that time, the science of oil formulation was only beginning; the quality of base oils was realtively poor, and additive technology was still in its infancy.
_________________________
You don't get a body like mine overnight. It takes years of neglect and lots of bacon. smile

Top
#2534142 - 02/12/12 04:22 PM Re: Automotive Bearing Parameters [Re: Shannow]
GMorg Offline


Registered: 01/29/06
Posts: 2435
Loc: Mizzou-land
The core of my question is related to the fact that the bearing must be able to contract and expand with temperature change. How much tighter can a bearing really get (clearances) and still be able to survive a Montana winter. It seems that tighter clearances will result in damaged bearings upon cool down.

Or, am I wrong. Are there alloys or bearing designs that can compensate for temperature effects on clearances.

Similarly, even if a bearing can be designed to compensate for temperature, at some point internal fluid friction would have to get fairly large. I am guessing that we still have wiggle room from a fluid friction point of view.

Top