Recent Topics
SnapOn Line Wrench
by George7941
02/20/17 01:11 AM
Be your own chauffeur for 10 cents on the dollar
by OneEyeJack
02/20/17 12:39 AM
looking for a crusier
by bowlofturtle
02/20/17 12:16 AM
Two month mini-review of my MacBook Pro
by redhat
02/20/17 12:06 AM
Redline 5W-40 vs 5W-30 for 2014 Infiniti Q50 3.7
by Patrick_C
02/19/17 11:39 PM
Do you think Toyota is on to something?
by OneEyeJack
02/19/17 11:17 PM
Is this Vinyl siding crack dangerous?
by maverickfhs
02/19/17 09:56 PM
Thoughts on MS HM and M1 HM
by car51
02/19/17 09:27 PM
E85 affects on Oil
by Mathew_Boss
02/19/17 09:27 PM
Why would anyone use 10w-30 when 5w-30 same price?
by EscapeVelocity
02/19/17 08:52 PM
540 Rat Blog - QSUD better than Mobil 1
by CapitalTruck
02/19/17 07:53 PM
Recommendations for atf fluid in '02 Focus ZX5.
by D Hill
02/19/17 07:51 PM
New Mobil 1 at Wal-Mart 20k Mile
by CapitalTruck
02/19/17 07:45 PM
MC FL-400S $2.77 Wal Mart
by car51
02/19/17 07:43 PM
Is oil getting worse? Did we reach peak oil?
by EscapeVelocity
02/19/17 06:31 PM
ATF smelled like fish
by arakele
02/19/17 06:21 PM
Viscosity Index
by RedOak
02/19/17 06:15 PM
HVAC Actuator Fix...
by Warstud
02/19/17 06:11 PM
Cut Open - Fram TG3614
by Big Smoke
02/19/17 05:33 PM
Mazda3 oil drain plug
by Kira
02/19/17 05:17 PM
Newest Members
coolcars, CorvusCorax, DecaturPure, Goatflogger, Fordson
60572 Registered Users
Who's Online
22 registered (fonecord2, bvance554, DeafBrad, Farmer, Flashlightboy, 2 invisible), 946 Guests and 16 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
60572 Members
66 Forums
261290 Topics
4310107 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 4 of 4 < 1 2 3 4
Topic Options
#1826758 - 03/22/10 10:33 AM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: Nyquist]
Brian Barnhart Offline


Registered: 05/26/03
Posts: 771
Loc: Ohio
UOA wear numbers are low, which seems fairly typical for this engine. There is probably significant fuel dilution in this engine (even though itís not apparent in the fuel number). That would seem to explain why the shearing and flashpoint are not what one would expect to see in a synthetic after only 2.7K.

The OLM for this engine probably would have gone over 8K on this OCI before reaching 0%. That seems rather long given the shearing and flashpoint numbers in this UOA report.

Based on what I see here, a dino probably would have performed just as well in this engine under these conditions.

Top
#1826950 - 03/22/10 01:12 PM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: Brian Barnhart]
21Rouge Offline


Registered: 06/04/05
Posts: 1954
Loc: Vinegar Hill
Originally Posted By: Brian Barnhart
UOA wear numbers are low, which seems fairly typical for this engine.

Based on what I see here, a dino probably would have performed just as well in this engine under these conditions.


But might there be reasons to think that a synthetic oil performs better (than a dino) in the presence of fuel? i.e. better resists shearing or even with comparable shearing still protects the engine better?

Top
#1826987 - 03/22/10 01:39 PM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: 21Rouge]
Brian Barnhart Offline


Registered: 05/26/03
Posts: 771
Loc: Ohio
I didn't spend much time looking at other Ecotec results, but from what I've seen, the evidence doesn't seem to support the idea that synthetic (or at least this particular synthetic) performs better than a dino in this application. Both shearing and flashpoint have degraded significantly and rather quickly. Vis and FP for this oil are no better than this dino in another Ecotec with nearly twice the OCI. Plus, the M1 started out thicker and synthetics usually have greater initial flashpoints.

Top
#1827108 - 03/22/10 03:21 PM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: kender]
TomYoung Offline


Registered: 06/06/08
Posts: 597
Loc: New Jersey
Every 1,700 miles roughly? Sure hope you are using one of the high-end synthetic oils:)

Top
#1827116 - 03/22/10 03:30 PM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: ARCOgraphite]
TomYoung Offline


Registered: 06/06/08
Posts: 597
Loc: New Jersey
Originally Posted By: ARCOgraphite
Start up noise, hot running noise, rough running and tappet noise and car wouldnt rev over 4K rpm which is indicative of insufficent hot viscosity. The VVTi is very sensitive - Toyota 1nzfe ECU require a re-flash if you run 20w oils. As soon as I did the OC car ran perfect (after a couple days babying it during the add pack changeover).



Are you saying that the engine would not rev past 4k due to the oil degradation.... I don't think so.

Top
#1827294 - 03/22/10 06:07 PM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: TomYoung]
JAG Offline


Registered: 10/23/05
Posts: 4550
Loc: Fredericksburg, VA
3 comments below are in response to some other posters' comments.
1) Part of what makes this an "Advanced Fuel Economy" oil for an XW-30 oil is the initially low HTHS viscosity (2.99 cP) and the poor shear stability, making the used oil HTHS drop significantly further.

2) Viscosity loss from mechanical shearing happens very quickly and stabilizes as more and more of the polymeric viscosity index improved get broken, since they become harder to break the smaller they are. By 2700 miles, most of the mechanical shearing is complete.

3) Used motor oil flashpoint is dominated by the amount of fuel so the virgin oil's flashpoint doesn't factor in.

Wear looks fine. This engine appears to be a breeze on oil.

Top
#1841334 - 04/01/10 04:12 PM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: TomYoung]
sbergman27 Offline


Registered: 03/12/10
Posts: 371
Loc: Oklahoma
Quote:
Are you saying that the engine would not rev past 4k due to the oil degradation.... I don't think so.


What he's implying is that the oil had sheared to such a low viscosity that the vvt-i actuator couldn't function, leaving the valve timing in the fully retarded setting.

I don't believe that for a moment, of course. (And would love to see an independent reference to this supposed "known problem".) But that's what he's saying.

Toyota issued a TSB for his (an my) engine OK'ing use of 5w20 in them back in 2006, which didn't mention anything at all about vvt-i problems or an ECU reflash. So that should settle that.

-Steve


Edited by sbergman27 (04/01/10 04:16 PM)

Top
#1843173 - 04/02/10 11:58 PM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: addyguy]
chet2 Offline


Registered: 07/19/07
Posts: 1408
Loc: NH
so oil couldve gone 8k according to OLM even in nasty weather... i used to change my oil every 3-4k or so till i knew how long oil could really go...now i go at least 6k and that is conservative

Top
#1843174 - 04/02/10 11:59 PM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: chet2]
chet2 Offline


Registered: 07/19/07
Posts: 1408
Loc: NH
how was mpg on the 0-30?...i have a ecotec too

Top
#1844423 - 04/04/10 08:06 AM Re: Mobil 1 0w30 2008 Chevy Cobalt 2.2L Ecotec [Re: Nyquist]
fdcg27 Offline


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 13139
Loc: OH
Wear looks pretty good.
It would be interesting to see a UOA of a longer run with this oil, which would settle the question of whether you reached a point where shear stability had been reached, or whether shearing would continue in a linear fashion.
I put this oil in a friend's G5 2.2.
My logic was that the oil should be just fine down to 0% OLM and beyond, while delivering good cold-weather performance, and enough fuel economy improvement to cover its cost ($12.00 after MIR).
I also thought that the low HTHS was just fine for this engine, since it cannot impose the kind of loads and heat that would require a higher HTHS, and HTHS was apparently not something GM found necessary to account for in their OLM logic.
I currently have this oil in my '99 Accord as well.
Also used it as a winter fill the previous year.
I have a third jug for next winter, all of it cheap after MIR.
_________________________
12 Accord LX 61K HGMO 0W-20
09 Forester 67K PU 5W-30
02 Accord 144K GOil 5W-30
01 Focus ZX3 112K M1 5W-20
95 BMW 318iC 159K Delvac 15W-40

Top
Page 4 of 4 < 1 2 3 4