Gumout Q&A with Rusty Waples

Click here to participate in the Gumout Rusty Waples Q&A

Recent Topics
New timing belt install, Belt moving around?
by Why_Anything
48 minutes 17 seconds ago
Antifreeze deals?
by KenO
Yesterday at 10:57 PM
Switching from semi-syn to full syn at 75,000 kms
by BradC
Yesterday at 10:22 PM
Honda HS35 Snowblower
by Toaster_Jer
Yesterday at 09:39 PM
Dirt road driving, what tire psi?
by Nick1994
Yesterday at 09:17 PM
2016 F150 2.7 UOA - Maxlife Syn 5w30 7,165mi
by tomcruise
Yesterday at 08:02 PM
Fram Ultra Rubber Gasket Failure
by ttvr4
Yesterday at 07:57 PM
Wire fence problem and possible solution
by Donald
Yesterday at 07:15 PM
New redwood fence
by OneEyeJack
Yesterday at 06:15 PM
2012 Accord 2.4 UOA - PPPP 0w20 4,722 mi.
by gregk24
Yesterday at 05:43 PM
Need new tires
by fxrider
Yesterday at 04:59 PM
At what temperature Summer tires unsafe to use
by raaizin
Yesterday at 04:43 PM
Newest Members
losman50731, VenatorLuporum, Doda1117, Optistartremote, rmercer
59445 Registered Users
Who's Online
33 registered (A310, Atesz792, asiancivicmaniac, BrotherAli, akela, BradC, 3 invisible), 804 Guests and 15 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
59445 Members
66 Forums
256102 Topics
4209479 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#1594237 - 09/09/09 01:33 PM using 5W30 instead of 5W20
cteichroeb Offline

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 3
Loc: Canada
my new Ford says it requires 5W20. 5W20 is hard to find where i live. Is it a problem to use synthetic 5W30 instead of 5W20? Why are these vehicles moving towards this standard? The viscosity is better with 30 weight which would exceed the requirement. How could this be harmful?

Ford has tried to tell me that it could void their warranty by not following their guidelines.

#1594245 - 09/09/09 01:42 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: cteichroeb]
bepperb Offline

Registered: 01/10/08
Posts: 4954
Loc: Milwaukee, WI

Go to google. Type: 5w-20.

Half the results will be this exact question.
2004 Highlander 2.4
2011 Toyota Sienna 3.5
Recently Gone:
2006 Accord 2.4l K24A8
1993 Kawi EX 500

#1594248 - 09/09/09 01:46 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: bepperb]
Nayov Offline

Registered: 08/01/09
Posts: 815
Loc: ME
Isn't there a Wal Mart near you?

#1594250 - 09/09/09 01:52 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: Nayov]
Gary Allan Offline

Registered: 09/28/02
Posts: 39806
Loc: Pottstown, PA
I find it most comical that the most sensible weight for use in their extreme winter climate also the most limited in availability. I would think Canada would be so far ahead of the curve on this.

It's obvious that they don't produce "in spec" fluids domestically. That means that it's the "regulated border" thingie like with filters.

#1594259 - 09/09/09 02:07 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: Gary Allan]
Zaedock Offline

Registered: 09/10/05
Posts: 3899
Loc: Massachusetts

Welcome to the forum! welcome

Ford has spec'd 5W20 oils for a while now (2001+/-). There is MUCH more to an oil's performance than viscosity alone. 5W20 oils have to meet some very tuff standards. I highly recommend you do some diggin here on BITOG to help get you up to speed on the use of 5W20 oils. The factory engineers perform a lot of testing on their vehicles. They may not be the solution for all engines/applications, but where a vehicle can keep consistant oil temperatures in various climates, they work very well and offer an economy benefit.

I have a 5000 mile trip out to Utah pulling 6000 lbs of Jeep and trailer next month. I'll be running 5W20 oil. She'll be perfectly fine!

If you use your vehicle as the factory intended and don't modify or race it, you'll be fine with 5w20.
2016 KIA Optima SXL 2.0L Turbo/2012 F150 Ex-cab 5.0L
1992 YJ "The Heep"/2004 Malibu Maxx LT
1975 Ford Bronco/1959 Willys CJ5/20XX Custom rock crawler

#1594263 - 09/09/09 02:10 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: Gary Allan]
HTSS_TR Offline

Registered: 04/17/06
Posts: 19528
Loc: Lake Forest, CA
It is not right that 5W20 of many brands can be found at most auto parts stores in So Cal, and we never have anything below freezing (0 degree C) for almost ever, and it is hard to find it in Canada where it is needed 6 mos of a year.
'00 MB E430
'04 Honda S2000
'06 Volvo V70
'14 Honda Accord LX
"Throwing food away is like stealing it from the poor and hungry" Pope Francis

#1594270 - 09/09/09 02:22 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: cteichroeb]
chevrofreak Offline

Registered: 06/17/05
Posts: 4941
Loc: Billings, MT
Originally Posted By: cteichroeb
The viscosity is better with 30 weight which would exceed the requirement.

Correction. The viscosity is higher, not better.
I <3 Red Line oil

#1594283 - 09/09/09 02:33 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: cteichroeb]
XJ1100 Offline

Registered: 02/28/05
Posts: 94
Loc: MN
Originally Posted By: cteichroeb

Ford has tried to tell me that it could void their warranty by not following their guidelines.

In the US this is very much correct: To maintain your warranty coverage you need to use service fluids that meet the specification set forth by the manufacturer of the vehicle. So in this case I believe that Ford could void your warranty for not using the correct type of fluid (5w-20). However, they cannot void your warranty based on brand or who completes the service.

Now with this being said, I am going to use 5w-30 as my next crankcase fill in my '04 F-150 w/ 4.6 that specifically states 5w-20 in the manual. My point is that you will not cause any harm using the 5w-30, but be advised that Ford has every right to void your engine warranty if there should ever be an oil related failure...highly unlikely.

#1594320 - 09/09/09 02:58 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: XJ1100]
tig1 Offline

Registered: 01/03/09
Posts: 11710
Loc: Illinois
The warranty may be a problem, but Falcon from Kuawit told me the engines I have in my two Fords, both call for 5-20, call for 5-30 overthere. I run M1 5-30EP in both of them. Last year I did a UOA on the Focus,9500 miles, and it was very good.
Bottom line, aside from the warranty, no problem with the 5-30.
2007 Ford Fusion 190,000 miles
M1 0-20 AFE
2007 Ford Focus 161,000 miles
M1 0-20 AFE
10,000 mile OCIs on both engines
M1 10-30 in all OPE
MC filters

#1594403 - 09/09/09 04:00 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: cteichroeb]
cteichroeb Offline

Registered: 09/08/09
Posts: 3
Loc: Canada
thanks very much to all that have replied.

I have been using 5W30 in my 2001 F150 since I got it and it also says it required 5W20. 5W20 shows up in stores here ocassionaly but doesn't last long and usually the only thing I can purchase is 5W30.

There seems to be a lot of demand for this type of oil however my Canadian Tire store rarely has it in stock.

#1594413 - 09/09/09 04:11 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: cteichroeb]

Registered: 04/28/08
Posts: 32386
Loc: Ontario, Canada
That engine was previously spec'd for 5w30 anyways.

My '02 Expedition is spec'd for 5w20, I'm running 5w40 in it.
02 Expedition
06 Charger R/T
14 Charger SRT-8

#1594437 - 09/09/09 04:28 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: OVERKILL]
Jim Allen Offline

Registered: 08/12/05
Posts: 4477
Loc: NW Ohio

Yes, I was shouting, but not in anger, just to get attention. If any short term issues occur with 5w30 rather than 5w20, it will be with '04-up engines with Variable Valve Timing (VVT) and likely those would be in cooler climates. Overall, getting the skinny on issue of viscosity vs VVT operation is elusive. We get some anecdotal material from owners that say A-OK for a 30 grade and a few bragging about 40 grade, but these people don't necessarily know what's happening inside the engine. On the other hand, we have cautions from Ford, including some direct from engineers... but they are a bit short of specifics. It seems clear, even factoring VVT, you could most likely get away with a 5W30 in a hot climate. Might even be more desirable for a hard worker in a really hot climate, but in a cooler climate where the oil may seldom or never reach it's rated viscosity due to being below 210F... who knows. The VVT devices are controlled by the oil. It stands to reason that viscosity would effect them. How much has yet to be answered. Me, I'm being a little cautious. My truck is well outta warranty but I don't particular want to tear into it (well, I DO because I'm a gearhead and I love working on engines, I just don't want to have to pay for it).
Jim Allen
Keepin' the Good Old Days of Four Wheeling Alive

#1594466 - 09/09/09 05:05 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: Gary Allan]
FZ1 Offline

Registered: 02/07/08
Posts: 4195
Loc: Texas
That's right,Gary. Down here, we live free and run 5-20!

#1594474 - 09/09/09 05:15 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: Jim Allen]

Registered: 10/04/05
Posts: 340
Loc: Texas
Good post Jim. I've done a little experimenting with my 08 4.6 3valve Mustang and frankly I don't think it much matters what you run. I've tried M1 0W40 and it was as smooth and quiet as it was on 5W20 M1. I then tried a run of M1 5W30 and same noticible changes. So I'm back to 5W20 since it's under warranty and just easier not to worry about it. The VVT must have a little cushion factor built in cause mine sure didn't mind thicker oil. The crazy thing is on my 60 mile a day highway commute the mileage never varied between the oil's! YMMV popcorn2

#1594476 - 09/09/09 05:18 PM Re: using 5W30 instead of 5W20 [Re: SAJEFFC]
Colt45ws Offline

Registered: 08/15/06
Posts: 8883
Loc: Central Washington
Well, in Texas with 0W40, Its kinda not surprising. Does not apply to someone living in Canada.
2002 Ford Crown Vic PI, 191k "Highwayman"
Ex-Kootenai County, ID Unit #42
Maxlife 5W20
Lubegard Bio/Tech oil treatment
Ultra XG2

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >