Mobil1's ATF cold performance hasn't changed and still one of the best -40 Brookfield numbers, has great pour point and high flash point. If its -40 centipoise and pour point shoots upward, then I'd wager that there would be less higher group base oils. For now, I'd wager that it is still a real synthetic.
ATF numbers comparison, info pulled from MFG websites:
Brookfield -40*c---pour point(*F)---flash point(*F):
Schaeffers 204 = 8600-12000, -60, 425
Castrol TransmaxZ = 8400, -75, 439
Valvoline ATF+4 = 9000, -54, 385
Redline D4 ATF = 5200, -76, 437
Redline DexII = 4500, -65, 435
Mobil"1" ATF = 5190, -65, 456
Mobil D/M = 16,670, PP?, 356
Pennzoil MV = 8600, -49, 374
RoyalPurple = 7934, PP?, 450
Mobil MV = 12,000, PP?, 356
Amsoil ATF = 9621, PP?, 435
Amsoil ATD = 8400, -67, 450
Neo ATF = 8300, -65, 428
D/M, is your typical mineral oil ATF(dexronIII Mercon). Nothing special there.
MerconV is your typical blend. Ford requires 12000 -40 spec.
I find it funny that Schaeffers gives a 'range' for the -40 spec.
Pennzoil MV is also a blend(a pretty good one at that).
ATF+4 is that well known XHVI group III ATF. As you can see, its an excellent performer for the money.
And, you can see where the full synthetics fall in performance(best flash points), best -40 number(M1/RL), best pour point(transmax Z, D4),......