It's so new, that Kumho USA hasn't put it on their website yet
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tire...vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tire...vehicleSearch=false&fromCompare1=yes
I have two sets of Crugen HT51s (on the truck and on the Rogue). Phenomenal tires, they’re just copies of the Michelin LTX and preform exactly the same for about $75-100 less per tire (had LTXs in the past) and required a tiny amount of weights to balance out. My go to tire brand now.I've had a couple sets of General Altimax RT43's and 2 sets of Kumho Crugen HT51's. In most cases that might be a apples to oranges comparison, but I would go with the Kumho of those two if it was an option every time. Great tire for what I put it on anyway.
I have two sets of Crugen HT51s (on the truck and on the Rogue). Phenomenal tires, they’re just copies of the Michelin LTX and preform exactly the same for about $75-100 less per tire (had LTXs in the past) and required a tiny amount of weights to balance out. My go to tire brand now.
Oddly enough I usually look specifically for brands that supply OEM equipment when looking at tires. I know that the tires that are usually fitted from the factory are trash in terms of grip but I’d wager that the big automakers are strict about QC simply because they don’t want to have to pay/deal with warranty claims for poorly made tires or have extra time on the line balancing out wonky tires. Always look at it like a stamp of approval that the company can make a tire that will balance and not fail. I’m amazed at how few weights it requires to balance a Kumho or Michelin compared to a lot of cheapo import brands from China. IMHO definitely a sign of good manufacturing processesThose are good tires. YET-you have some on here who will never buy Kumho because they didn't like what came OEM, even if it was a totally different tire in their lineup. Yea-like so many things on here-makes very little sense.