Recent Topics
tips to avoid bringing back bed bugs
by WhyMe - 09/17/19 09:46 PM
Fram Ultra worth it over OEM?
by Jimmy_Russells - 09/17/19 09:42 PM
Time for a new phone! Recommendations?
by cwilliamsws6 - 09/17/19 08:58 PM
How Do You Listen to Music ?
by Warstud - 09/17/19 08:57 PM
Runnings Harvest King Dino $1.75/QT
by Zaedock - 09/17/19 08:15 PM
Typical generic TPMS install costs
by Patrick0525 - 09/17/19 05:23 PM
Marvel Ultimate Fuel and Motor Treatment
by 03s - 09/17/19 03:50 PM
Upcoming tire sales?
by supton - 09/17/19 03:44 PM
Welding Rusted Control Arm Mount
by George7941 - 09/17/19 03:42 PM
15w40 in my automatic trans.
by Ursatdx - 09/17/19 03:16 PM
Update on my Stihl BG 86
by 1978elcamino - 09/17/19 03:11 PM
Offset print oil
by Matt_Pill - 09/17/19 03:06 PM
Which 508.00 oil would you choose?
by Vigg - 09/17/19 02:55 PM
Any BMW LL04 recommendations?
by M3m3x5 - 09/17/19 02:18 PM
5W30 Suggestions/Subaru
by Motoretro - 09/17/19 02:18 PM
Recommend Costco tires
by henni - 09/17/19 01:58 PM
Castrol SRF Shortage
by kyoo - 09/17/19 01:26 PM
All aftermarket drums and shoes = junk?
by nthach - 09/17/19 12:38 PM
Synthetic ISO 32 Hydraulic Fluid for BL-7000SLX
by 05UFCaptain - 09/17/19 11:51 AM
Newest Members
scoutmstr, 2_Tall_Mitchell, HRXfan, ShaTR, thetransman
69312 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
98 registered members (Aichiguy, alchargo, 69GTX, 08z06, 9 invisible), 1,928 guests, and 29 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics294,703
Posts5,064,978
Members69,312
Most Online3,532
Jul 30th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54120 11/13/03 11:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 879
C
chefwong Offline OP
OP Offline
C
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 879
See below. Just saw the reply. Is FM / EP that is in Redlines Oil that bad....I changed the oil out at 3200 miles, and also at 6500 miles just last weekend again with Redline 5W30.

I would have figuered the *initial* break in for the rings would have been taken place after 3000+ miles. I varied the RPM (and still do) up to 5K to help the rings set properly.

Just new to this but any advice is greatly appreciated !


____________________

Ugh, why would you void your warranty with Redline? Unless you do a lot of specialized racing, Redline is NOT the oil of choice. Get it out, not for extended drains. Why did you change factory fill at 3k anyway? Isn't the BMW interval 15,000 miles? Your engine will not break-in properly with fresh oil that has tons of FM and EP, bad move. Your rings have to seat while there is cross-hatching still in the cylinder bore. Honestly, at this point, I'd put in a DINO oil and drive it hard, low revs and deep throttle, seat those rings. I guess you *could* just change to a BMW or ACEA A3 approved oil like, M1 0w-40 (not my fav) GC or regular ACEA A3 Syntec 10w-40 or 5w-30. Redline is for cars like nitrous V-tec Civics. Timing-wise, my opinion is 6 month intervals are best, up to 8,000 miles each. Fresh oil for the cold of winter and heat of the summer means changing in Nov and May, forget about miles.

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54121 11/13/03 11:47 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 89
M
mrhonda Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 89
I don't think whoever wrote that has any clue what they are talking about... but that's just my $.02

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54122 11/14/03 12:01 AM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 584
1
1maniac Offline
Offline
1
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 584
I'm willing to bet if you ask Redline that they'll tell you their oil is not just for "nitrous V-tec Civics." Redline makes some pretty good oils. I've got two cases ready to try in my BMW [Big Grin] [Big Grin] when I'm done with the Amsoil. Whomever wrote that is off base.

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54123 11/14/03 12:13 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,095
J
jason07-1zzfe Offline
Offline
J
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,095
[Roll Eyes]

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54124 11/14/03 12:23 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,354
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,354
Chefwong,

I use Synthetics (on avergae) from about 3,000 miles on and have had no oil consumption problems with any vehicle.

I started using AMsoil 0W30 in my Frontier at 110 miles with no oil concumption/breaking-in problems.

Now using Redline [email protected] 80,000 miles and still no problems.

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54125 11/14/03 12:28 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
C
Cary Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Copied directly from Mobil's website:


When can I start using Mobil 1 with SuperSyn™ in my new vehicle?


You can start using Mobil 1 with SuperSyn™ in new vehicles at any time, even in brand-new vehicles. In fact, Mobil 1 with SuperSyn™ is original equipment (it is installed at the factory) in:

* Chevrolet Corvette
* All Porsche vehicles
* Mercedes-Benz AMG vehicles
* Dodge Viper
* Ford Mustang Cobra R
* All Aston Martin cars

One of the myths that persists about Mobil 1 is that new engines require a break-in period with conventional oil. Current engine manufacturing technology does not require this break-in period. As indicated by the decisions of the engineers who design these "factory-fill" high-performance cars, Mobil 1 can be used in an engine from the day you drive the car off the showroom floor.


Cary

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54126 11/14/03 12:35 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 31,982
B
buster Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 31,982
Molekule, is this the Nissan that is hard on the oil? If so, did you ever sample the 0w-30? [Smile]

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54127 11/14/03 01:13 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,478
R
Ray H Offline
Offline
R
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,478
The funny thing is that UOAs on Honda's factory-fill oil show high (as in VERY) levels of molybdenum - itself not known for high friction characteristics... The prevailing (at least posted) opinions here is that Honda uses a special break-in oil loaded with molybdenum. I've not seen anything in -official- print suggesting this - the molybdenum could just as easily have come from the assembly lube used on the cam. No matter - the molybdenum's THERE in the oil at Honda's recommended change-out time. Now if having a slick AF/EP agent such as molybdenum retards break-in, WHY would a conscientous manufacturer like Honda load their new engines up with the stuff? (While BMW's been around a long time, given its market share worldwide, I'll bet Honda's built, raced, and sold more engines.) While I have no intention to switch to high-priced "designer" synthetic oil (Chevron Supreme 10W-30 dino every 3,000 miles RULES!), someone would have to be a complete anal orifice in claiming the use of Redline would be detrimental to the break-in process of a BMW (or even a Hyundai! [Smile] ).

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54128 11/14/03 01:55 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,739
M
medic Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,739
Okay, we'll get back to the reason that you couldn't run synthetic oil in a Harley Davidson engine.

Reason #1. It is TOO slippery, causes the needle bearing to skid and flat spot.

Think about this, an oil that is TOO slippery? Does this exsist? I want to buy stock in that company. And, a bearing that is skiding and being damaged by friction from an oil that is TOO slippery?

Hmmm, to slippery and friction causing damage from the same lubricant - is this possible?

I imagine that all of the FM's in Red Line will reduce the heat that is produced by this new engine during the break-in period. The rings will still seat, and it wouldn't surprise me if the cross-hatch is still visible after 10k miles with any oil. The downfall to running an expensive synthetic oil for breaking in is that it should, in most new engines, be drained too soon to realize the oil's full potential.

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54129 11/14/03 02:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 243
D
Drstressor Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 243
Yes, it's the heat that concerns certain engine manufacturers about the use of synthetic oils during break in. Synthetic base stocks have a higher heat capacity than conventional oils. This allows them to carry heat away from moving parts better. Correct seating of piston rings requires a certain amount of heat in order to allow the softer metals to "flow" into shape. If high enough temperatures are not attained during the initial break in period, most of the break in wear will be the result of the high spots on the rings welding and shearing off as wear metal. In the extreme case, this can lead to cylinder glazing, which causes persistent oil consumption for the rest of the engine's useful life.

But this is all hypothetical. I really doubt that the difference in heat transfer is significant between synthetic and conventional oils in automotive engines. If you break in an engine properly (alternating load and cool down periods), the base stock shouldn't make much difference. The only possible exception might be in heavy duty diesel engines used in pickups. There, unless the engine is operated under design spec loads during break in, cylinder temperatures don't get high enough to allow proper ring seating. In this application, the use of synthetics early on could be detrimental.

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54130 11/14/03 02:40 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,354
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,354
Buster,

This Nissan engine is a high power density engine with a small sump and has oil squirters. The most mileage I have been able to put on any oil as yet was about 5.7k, and this was Mobil 1 "tricked." Most oils have degraded quickly from 3.5k on in this engine. What I meant by 3,000 miles: This was the average mileage in which I usually change from factory or dino oil to synthetics, with the exception being the Nissan Frontier.

As far as an Amsoil 0W30 analysis, no, since the results would have been skewed by factory "residuals" anyway. This was the oil I had on-hand when I brought the vehicle home from the dealership.

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54131 11/14/03 02:43 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 425
T
TSoA Offline
Offline
T
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 425
As the author of that response, I stand by it. Chef, refer to your BMW owner's manual for ACCURATE information on oil specs and change interval. As I remember it says, "1st change at 15,000 miles, BMW HP Synth/ACEA A3/BMW Long- Life 01 oil". I am sure the most profitable car company in the World is capable of authoring the exact specs into the manual based on 1000s of vehicles tested. Anyway, all I'm saying is you could have chosen a less contraversial oil with known additive chemistry and the correct ACEA specs...for break-in. That is what I'd do and is the best advice I can give. Wierd oils can affect break-in, period. Few members here have more European engine-building experience and Euro OEM Service experience than my peers and are here spouting on this issue without any basis. You *can* void your warranty with out-of-spec oil, if you want RL later, fine.

[ November 14, 2003, 05:52 PM: Message edited by: TSoA ]

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54132 11/14/03 02:50 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 31,982
B
buster Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 31,982
Thanks MK. [Cheers!]


quote:
I really doubt that the difference in heat transfer is significant between synthetic and conventional oils in automotive engines.
I'm not sure what defines significant but RL and S2k AMsoil can lower engine temps by 15-20F. I highly doubt that small of a change would make an impact though. Is RL's chemistry controversial or are oil analysis companies just not able to read it well?

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54133 11/14/03 03:14 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 764
Q
quadrun1 Offline
Offline
Q
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 764
Curiously, in the 2000/2001/2003 U.S. BMW owner's manuals I've seen, A3 is never mentioned, nor is BMW LL-01 spec.

They do name BMW High Performance 5W-30 Synthetic Oil, and Mobil 1 5W-30/5W-40 as acceptable.

BMW's oil meets ACEA A3, while Mobil 1 5W-30 does not. We don't have Mobil 1 5W-40 here (yet?)

From a 2003 E46 manual:

 -

Re: Redline Oil Bad for New Engines #54134 11/14/03 05:58 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 425
T
TSoA Offline
Offline
T
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 425
quadrun- thanks for providing that document. I assume the 15,000 mi interval is still in effect. Too bad that BMW did not take the time to survey all the available oils for their US customers. Gotta call that tech line, I wonder what they are saying about GC. (lol) I can only think ACEA A3 would be assumed, so I guess I gave bad advice? [I dont know] Mobil 1 5w-30 is A5, but SJ only for adding...??? OK, so Mobil 1 5w-30 is approved, use that. Why would BMW even mention a Euro blend 5w-40 when it is unavailable here or just define the specs more carefully? Will online BMW techs say RedLine is a good break-in oil? Doubt it. Can OTC 5w-30s go 15,000 miles, no. If someone's soultion to proper break-in procedure and factory oil or ~equlivant~ is $8q "mystery-formula" oil every 3000 miles, PLEASE just go do it. If this is what you have decided, to override factory OCI and fluids, you MUST have thought it out completely and why even post a doubt here just for me to give the RTFM (read the manual) answer that you know already. I don't understand, you (people) picked RL out in spite of ACEA and now don't want to hear that argument! I am sorry for ranting, but it seems every post claims a casulty of a couple of members that I've lost respect for in the last few weeks. To me this is simple, an unapproved fluid at an unapproved interval. [I dont know]

[ November 14, 2003, 09:00 PM: Message edited by: TSoA ]

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™