Originally Posted by Dave9
Am I missing something or wasn't a clutch blade brake required by law about... 20 years ago and still stands?
Personally, give me a light weight non-self-propelled. It need not have a big engine because I don't mow down forests with it nor want self propulsion that just slows me down, especially around obstacles, and is a know point of failure multiple times over the life of an otherwise good mower unless you give that propulsion system more attention and preventative maintenance than anything else besides oil changes.
All mowers stop the blade, but most stop the blade by killing the engine. I've been spoiled by the clutch blade brake, where the blade stops but the engine keeps running. I would totally buy any brand that combined no self propulsion with a clutch blade brake, but I don't think that machine exists...
I kind of forgot about Honda in my initial post. It looks like there is a Honda with a blade brake in the $500ish range, it still has some kind of propulsion system though. It has most of the features of the one with the hydrostatic Drive, clearly the propulsion is less good though but it's 250 bucks less.
There is a Toro super recycler that has a blade brake, it's got a "Toro" engine though. The otherwise similar model with the Honda engine does not have a blade brake
Are there any brands that are MUSA, assembled in Mexico of US parts, or at least not Chinese?
Thanks again,
Doug
P.S. As far as looking at getting engine work done by somebody else, I think 30+ years is long enough. It has a hole in the deck and the clutch cable has a spring on the end of it that's broken and wired together and probably not replaceable…