Recent Topics
School me on Radon...
by dareo - 02/28/20 08:56 PM
How do I bend this fence?
by Chris142 - 02/28/20 07:52 PM
Mercon LV in the transfer case?
by buck91 - 02/28/20 07:41 PM
Wix vanilla filters?
by NavyVet88 - 02/28/20 07:33 PM
What gas do pre-1974 LEADED gas cars run?
by wowthisexists - 02/28/20 05:50 PM
Does anyone do this?.,,
by BigCahuna - 02/28/20 05:49 PM
RMD-- Is this the time to take it?
by csandste - 02/28/20 03:29 PM
Timken Rear Wheel Bearing - Any Good?
by Delta - 02/28/20 02:47 PM
121k 2011 GMC Terrain 2.4 ~ PP 6250 miles
by Matt1980 - 02/28/20 02:42 PM
Mopar coolant alternative?
by ram_man - 02/28/20 02:38 PM
Old (but new) filters
by RF12 - 02/28/20 01:54 PM
5.3 DOD/AFM Delete - Looking for LS Advice
by RoadDukie - 02/28/20 01:47 PM
Help picking battery powered mower
by Huie83 - 02/28/20 01:41 PM
Can I use 75w instead 70w gear oil?
by Polyalphaolefin - 02/28/20 11:57 AM
Alternative to Unaffordable New SUV?
by Fitz98 - 02/28/20 11:24 AM
Newest Members
StratMan, ABchevy, RAOD, MichaelTx, duesenberg
70826 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
137 registered members (4WD, ArrestMeRedZ, Al, 762fermeandyou, Avery4, 14Accent, 14 invisible), 1,961 guests, and 19 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics302,056
Posts5,208,253
Members70,826
Most Online4,538
Jan 20th, 2020
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
9 years for the 4 cylinder Eco-boost #5333216 01/26/20 09:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5,908
S
Snagglefoot Offline OP
OP Offline
S
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 5,908
I noticed the new Ford Ranger has the 2.3 liter Eco-boost with 310 lb-ft of torque. I take it, the engine traces its development to the 2.0 Eco-Tech in the 2011 Ford Explorer and then being upped in displacement to 2.3 liters in 2016. Basically the engine has been around for 9 years. So what’s the verdict on this engine? Is it reliable? Anyone hear of stories of them with 200,000 miles? I haven’t really paid much attention to them but since they are in the new Ranger my interest has increased. Your input would be much appreciated. Thanks.

Last edited by Snagglefoot; 01/26/20 09:46 PM.

If you want the job done right......do it yourself.
Re: 9 years for the 4 cylinder Eco-boost [Re: Snagglefoot] #5333244 01/26/20 10:24 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,880
M
Miller88 Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,880
If the Mazda variant is to be counted, it's been around for a bit longer than that.

Some of the 2.3 in the Focus had head gasket issues because the wrong head gasket was used from the factory. The 2.0 has been rock solid. 1.6 and 1.5 versions had some issues not necessarily related to anything with GTDI.

Ford definitely figureed it out.


18 Forester 2.5I 6M
00 Jeep XJ
01 F-350 4x4 5M
Re: 9 years for the 4 cylinder Eco-boost [Re: Snagglefoot] #5333266 01/26/20 10:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,019
D
Drew2000 Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,019
The Ecoboost 2.3 debuted in 2015 for the Ford Mustang, some Lincolns and the Focus RS hot hatch. The Ranger 2.3 is a direct descendant from the Focus RS which produced 350hp and 350lb torque. Don't think too much if anything was carried over from the old Eco-Tech engine. (Even the Ecoboost 2.0 had a major retooling after only 4 years with new twin scroll turbos and integrated exhaust manifold and other changes.)

The Ecoboost line seems to be well designed engines that with regular maintenance lasts a long time. The Rangers 10 speed transmission which is pretty much the same as in the F150 should really last a long time in the lighter truck. I'm seriously looking at the Ranger in a year or two to pull a small camper when I retire. The F150 etc. are just getting too big for my tastes.

Some reading I came across.

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-shows/detroit-auto-show/a15840269/ford-focus-rs-ranger-engine/

Last edited by Drew2000; 01/26/20 10:42 PM.

17Escape 2.0
11Mustang GT
06Tribute
05Honda ST1300
03Yamaha FZ1
93Regal
91Explorer
87F250
85FJ1100
83CB650

Re: 9 years for the 4 cylinder Eco-boost [Re: Snagglefoot] #5334431 01/28/20 07:28 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,169
M
meep Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,169
^^^ our F150 is a good machine but I agree, there's a lot of unneccessary steel to drive around in every day. I think the 2.3EB Ranger is in a sweet spot. At some point we will no longer need the fullsize for towing, and if a truck is still a thing for us, the Ranger might do nicely. I've also been eyeing just getting a used sedan for daily use, but having an extra car annoys me from a financial point of view. It ages and depreciates and costs insurance while it sits there fading in the sun... It's cheaper to just drive the 150 daily....


2018 F150
2015 crv (wifey!)
Re: 9 years for the 4 cylinder Eco-boost [Re: meep] #5334578 01/28/20 10:40 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,880
M
Miller88 Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,880
Originally Posted by meep
^^^ our F150 is a good machine but I agree, there's a lot of unneccessary steel to drive around in every day.


Isn't it aluminum :P

Sorry, had to


18 Forester 2.5I 6M
00 Jeep XJ
01 F-350 4x4 5M
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™