Recent Topics
Ford Fusion wiper blade question
by Corollaman - 04/05/20 11:05 AM
Is this stainless steel?
by atikovi - 04/05/20 10:45 AM
Skyactiv 2.5L - Oil Capacity
by buster - 04/05/20 10:42 AM
3/4" hose
by CNT - 04/05/20 10:29 AM
Westinghouse iGen 4500 Generator
by SailSkiDrive - 04/05/20 09:16 AM
Generac Power Washer Engine Oil Type.
by Andya - 04/05/20 08:49 AM
Barrs leak oil additive
by Micahmcmeen - 04/05/20 08:10 AM
Lawn mower oil question
by icemanrrc - 04/05/20 08:10 AM
Wait until you see who's driving...
by Shannow - 04/05/20 06:57 AM
Getting My Harley Back On The Road
by Silverado12 - 04/05/20 06:45 AM
Oil brand you've never used
by OilUzer - 04/05/20 02:27 AM
New dishwasher on order...
by gregk24 - 04/05/20 12:19 AM
Blueing steel
by koffy - 04/04/20 11:53 PM
Home electrical question.
by 73guna - 04/04/20 10:20 PM
Castrol edge vs Valvoline synthetic?
by BTLew81 - 04/04/20 10:16 PM
My 1997 Ford Aspire 1.3 beater has me stumped
by IMSA_Racing_Fan - 04/04/20 09:50 PM
Newest Members
daniell, carguy1701, London, Dave66, Kurt_Kent_09
71104 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
105 registered members (ammolab, 2009Edge, 4WD, 77GrandPrix, 53' Stude, 92saturnsl2, 12 invisible), 2,424 guests, and 17 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics303,627
Posts5,238,647
Members71,104
Most Online4,538
Jan 20th, 2020
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? #5329297 01/22/20 08:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 41
N
NVRENUFF Offline OP
OP Offline
N
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 41
I’ve searched and could not find an answer, so I thought I’d ask here due to the knowledge available. I’ve had a few dmaxs and they always have had very low iron numbers on UOA. Recently I had to repair a lower oil pan and was surprised to find a large round magnet inside. It had a little metal on it that it’s attracted over the last 230k miles. My question is, do the other Diesel engines like cummins and ford use magnets in their oil pans these days? Also, how much will a magnet skew the true Fe readings of a UOA?

Re: Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? [Re: NVRENUFF] #5329306 01/22/20 08:54 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 109
D
Davejam Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 109
Removing the Fe from circulation should reduce wear and if its not circulating the UOA is correctly reporting what the engine is seeing.
But as an indicator of increasing or changing wear you are correct, you might have to inspect the magnet or rely on other means.

Re: Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? [Re: NVRENUFF] #5329320 01/22/20 09:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,879
K
kschachn Offline
Offline
K
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,879
Originally Posted by NVRENUFF
I’ve searched and could not find an answer, so I thought I’d ask here due to the knowledge available. I’ve had a few dmaxs and they always have had very low iron numbers on UOA. Recently I had to repair a lower oil pan and was surprised to find a large round magnet inside. It had a little metal on it that it’s attracted over the last 230k miles. My question is, do the other Diesel engines like cummins and ford use magnets in their oil pans these days? Also, how much will a magnet skew the true Fe readings of a UOA?

It depends on the particle size. But yes, it is certainly possible.


1994 BMW 530i, 252K
1996 Honda Accord, 288K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 434K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 284K
Re: Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? [Re: NVRENUFF] #5329429 01/22/20 11:45 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,175
B
bullwinkle Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,175
Never seen one in an oil pan. The 48RE transmission actually has one in the transmission pan, it seems to catch some iron bits. I’ve always thought magnets on the oil filter, either a Filtermag or old hard drive magnets, were a better idea-then it’s easy to cut the filter & see what’s going on.


06 Ram 3500 CTD 4X4(FG Venturi), 89 F-450 7.3, 98 XJ 4.0(XG8A), 05 xB(XG3600), 18 Transit 3.7 (MC), 03 Merc Grand Marquis 4.6 2V(XG2), 11 Express 3500 6.0 (Fram PH10060 for now)
Re: Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? [Re: NVRENUFF] #5329520 01/22/20 01:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,706
U
UncleDave Online Content
Online Content
U
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,706
Originally Posted by NVRENUFF
I’ve searched and could not find an answer, so I thought I’d ask here due to the knowledge available. I’ve had a few dmaxs and they always have had very low iron numbers on UOA. Recently I had to repair a lower oil pan and was surprised to find a large round magnet inside. It had a little metal on it that it’s attracted over the last 230k miles. My question is, do the other Diesel engines like cummins and ford use magnets in their oil pans these days? Also, how much will a magnet skew the true Fe readings of a UOA?


According to a thread Gary Allen either wrote or replied to a pan mag won't affect a standard UOA much if at all.

A filter mag likely won't either, but if one pays for a particle count they claim its good for between 1 and 3 iso code drops which is a fairly significant reduction.

As long as it stays put it certainly isnt hurting anything and is a good diagnostic tool letting you keep and eye on what me be getting worn off.



UD


Uncle Dave
Cat 3126/2 MB3500/Titan/RX400H/17 Ridgeline
700HP V10/ 725HP BBC/ Raptor 700/ KFX450/ YZ250/Onan 8K/ Cat3011C
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™