Recent Topics
End of Holden...
by Shannow - 02/16/20 09:10 PM
Getting Film Off Wheels
by Nick1994 - 02/16/20 08:58 PM
Moog wheel bearing and knuckle assy
by Imp4 - 02/16/20 07:37 PM
Daytona 500 engine related question
by OilUzer - 02/16/20 07:37 PM
2006 Subaru Forester 2.5 NA
by 762fermeandyou - 02/16/20 07:29 PM
DIY Paintless Dent Removal....
by dblshock - 02/16/20 07:17 PM
Bad sports teams
by 53' Stude - 02/16/20 06:42 PM
Valvoline 20W-50 Baja 1000 Race oil
by kstanf150 - 02/16/20 06:21 PM
How to stand on the roof of a Saturn Vue?
by atikovi - 02/16/20 06:09 PM
Spliceline wire connectors
by Donald - 02/16/20 05:22 PM
Found a few clearance oils at AZ today
by PantherFan88 - 02/16/20 04:55 PM
NASCAR electric
by CourierDriver - 02/16/20 04:52 PM
Valvoline Modern Engine vs Regular synthetic?
by PantherFan88 - 02/16/20 04:50 PM
Converting 1970 396 to Fuel Injection
by 007 - 02/16/20 04:47 PM
2016 frontier.
by red7404 - 02/16/20 04:34 PM
Ruger .22 SA - not a good show
by JHZR2 - 02/16/20 03:48 PM
engine maintenance Jaguar
by jssaab - 02/16/20 03:02 PM
New TSC clearance
by Greg L - 02/16/20 02:58 PM
Castrol Edge 5w20 and 5w30 Costco
by nlife - 02/16/20 02:41 PM
Newest Members
FlightRT, 74Widebody, mmmmmnnn, jjrockbush, eamerritt
70721 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
117 registered members (4WD, 928, 2009Caraman, 2003f7, 2015Corolla, 2002 Maxima SE, 11 invisible), 2,090 guests, and 38 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics301,543
Posts5,197,640
Members70,721
Most Online4,538
Jan 20th, 2020
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? #5329297 01/22/20 07:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 41
N
NVRENUFF Offline OP
OP Offline
N
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 41
I’ve searched and could not find an answer, so I thought I’d ask here due to the knowledge available. I’ve had a few dmaxs and they always have had very low iron numbers on UOA. Recently I had to repair a lower oil pan and was surprised to find a large round magnet inside. It had a little metal on it that it’s attracted over the last 230k miles. My question is, do the other Diesel engines like cummins and ford use magnets in their oil pans these days? Also, how much will a magnet skew the true Fe readings of a UOA?

Re: Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? [Re: NVRENUFF] #5329306 01/22/20 07:54 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 95
D
Davejam Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 95
Removing the Fe from circulation should reduce wear and if its not circulating the UOA is correctly reporting what the engine is seeing.
But as an indicator of increasing or changing wear you are correct, you might have to inspect the magnet or rely on other means.

Re: Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? [Re: NVRENUFF] #5329320 01/22/20 08:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,473
K
kschachn Offline
Offline
K
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 13,473
Originally Posted by NVRENUFF
I’ve searched and could not find an answer, so I thought I’d ask here due to the knowledge available. I’ve had a few dmaxs and they always have had very low iron numbers on UOA. Recently I had to repair a lower oil pan and was surprised to find a large round magnet inside. It had a little metal on it that it’s attracted over the last 230k miles. My question is, do the other Diesel engines like cummins and ford use magnets in their oil pans these days? Also, how much will a magnet skew the true Fe readings of a UOA?

It depends on the particle size. But yes, it is certainly possible.


1994 BMW 530i, 251K
1996 Honda Accord, 280K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 430K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 284K
Re: Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? [Re: NVRENUFF] #5329429 01/22/20 10:45 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,995
B
bullwinkle Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,995
Never seen one in an oil pan. The 48RE transmission actually has one in the transmission pan, it seems to catch some iron bits. I’ve always thought magnets on the oil filter, either a Filtermag or old hard drive magnets, were a better idea-then it’s easy to cut the filter & see what’s going on.


06 Ram 3500 CTD 4X4(FG Venturi), 93 GMC C3500 6.2, 89 F-450 7.3, 98 XJ 4.0(XG8A), 05 xB(XG3600), 18 Transit 3.7, 03 Merc Grand Marquis 4.6 2V(XG2)
Re: Duramax traditionally low Fe numbers, because of a magnet? [Re: NVRENUFF] #5329520 01/22/20 12:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,672
U
UncleDave Offline
Offline
U
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,672
Originally Posted by NVRENUFF
I’ve searched and could not find an answer, so I thought I’d ask here due to the knowledge available. I’ve had a few dmaxs and they always have had very low iron numbers on UOA. Recently I had to repair a lower oil pan and was surprised to find a large round magnet inside. It had a little metal on it that it’s attracted over the last 230k miles. My question is, do the other Diesel engines like cummins and ford use magnets in their oil pans these days? Also, how much will a magnet skew the true Fe readings of a UOA?


According to a thread Gary Allen either wrote or replied to a pan mag won't affect a standard UOA much if at all.

A filter mag likely won't either, but if one pays for a particle count they claim its good for between 1 and 3 iso code drops which is a fairly significant reduction.

As long as it stays put it certainly isnt hurting anything and is a good diagnostic tool letting you keep and eye on what me be getting worn off.



UD


Uncle Dave
Cat 3126/2 MB3500/Titan/RX400H/17 Ridgeline
700HP V10/ 725HP BBC/ Raptor 700/ KFX450/ YZ250/Onan 8K/ Cat3011C
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™