Recent Topics
school me on tint
by WhyMe - 02/19/20 04:27 PM
Michelin 7% Price Increase Effective 3/16/20
by Egg_Head - 02/19/20 03:58 PM
GunsInternational
by Yah-Tah-Hey - 02/19/20 03:39 PM
400hp VW Arteon confirmed for 2021
by wemay - 02/19/20 03:11 PM
redline 75W140
by mobilaltima - 02/19/20 02:50 PM
brake flush, upgrade to dot 4 or stay with dot 3
by apollo18 - 02/19/20 02:49 PM
I'm hoping it is the battery. 2016 Camry
by andyd - 02/19/20 02:48 PM
New Zoro 20% off $75 or more
by bullwinkle - 02/19/20 02:24 PM
New platinum beta ratio?
by mpgo4th - 02/19/20 01:40 PM
Lubrizol GF-6 Video Interview w/ Martin Birze
by ARCOgraphite - 02/19/20 01:31 PM
2008 GMC Sierra - AMSOIL SS 5w30 - 5300~ miles
by Samrsnow - 02/19/20 01:23 PM
Factory Ford filter cut open
by mpgo4th - 02/19/20 01:01 PM
VW coolant G12+ compatable G12++
by raaizin - 02/19/20 12:27 PM
Fun Electrical Gremlins with the Jeep
by Miller88 - 02/19/20 11:59 AM
Checking inner CV joints on fwd
by ram_man - 02/19/20 11:39 AM
AIR FRANCE FLIGHT 296
by 53' Stude - 02/19/20 10:51 AM
Brakes failing randomly
by Avery4 - 02/19/20 10:28 AM
Reliable Brand Washer / Dryer
by diyjake - 02/19/20 10:05 AM
Royal purple oil filters have gone downhill?
by Sprite - 02/19/20 09:25 AM
Meguiar's Ceramic Wax, $13.97 @ Wmart
by wemay - 02/19/20 09:23 AM
Newest Members
Antherzoll, mmahaley, Butterfly, TorchHypnosis, Tgibson
70751 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
111 registered members (97prizm, 1978elcamino, 53' Stude, 28oz, 14 invisible), 2,287 guests, and 24 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics301,661
Posts5,200,153
Members70,751
Most Online4,538
Jan 20th, 2020
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 #5241221 10/16/19 09:34 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 176
J
JMHC Offline OP
OP Offline
J
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 176
I need new tires for my Camry, and the car came with the Michelin Primacy MXM4's. They have lasted about 45,000 miles, have been pretty quiet, and have done well in all weather conditions here in Ohio. I had a car in the past with the original Continental Purecontacts, and I thought they were really great in rain and snow. The only issue was that they quickly developed a humming noise that was pretty annoying. I can get the new Purecontact LS's for about $200 less installed than the Michelins. I really like the Michelins, but I wouldn't mind saving $200. I would absolutely try the Conti's, my only issue are some reviews indicate they wear fast and are pretty noisy. I've read mixed reviews on them, some people say they are quiet, some say they are loud. Does anyone have any long-term experience with them, or had them and the Primacy's for comparison? Thanks.


1998 Pontiac Trans Am
2015 Toyota Camry V6 XSE
2009 Toyota RAV4 4WD 2.5
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241232 10/16/19 09:45 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,175
C
Char Baby Offline
Offline
C
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,175
Personally I'd get the Michelins if you like'em and have had good success with'em on the vehicle that you're replacing tires on. However, there are Continental TrueContact Tour that are supposed to be quite good and I've been eying them. Also, there are better Michelin's out there too as the MXM's are an old design.


"Retired"
-----------------------------------

'80 Firebird FORMULA V8/4bbl-purchased "NEW"
'15 Nissan Altima 2.5 SV
'15 Honda Civic 1.8 LX
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241245 10/16/19 10:04 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,068
V
volk06 Offline
Offline
V
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 5,068
I put a set of purecontacts on the focus, 195/65/15H right at 3 years ago. I have 45K on the tires now. I still have 6/32 of tread left and the DWS is still visible, the S is starting to wear out a bit though. They will get close to the 75K tread warranty now that I have a set of winter tires. If I were to chose to wear them down to 2/32 (I probably buy a new set of tires at 3/32.)

My impressions over the past 3 years with driving on them. Wet and dry traction is excellent, really good road manners and hugs the corners on the road. I feel confident with them in almost all scenarios. Winter traction overall is pretty good for the category. I've went through 2 winters with them, they do good in the snow and snowy roads. On frosty and icey roads, they work ok but the biting edges in between the tread do not work as well as it does with snow on the ground; I could feel the car shimmy a little bit. I feel they would perform even better but the focus is such a light car.

They definitely do make some noise now when compared to new and have a hum to them. They've stayed balanced, wear good, and have road good manners. I'm pleased the their performance. I caught a DT sale (when they were still good) and paid $94 a tire before mount and balance.

I can not compare to your Michelin. If it saves you $200, I'd have no issue going with the continentals.

Driving habits = M, W, F is 60 miles a day, 30 on interstate at 75-80, 30 at 60mph. T, TH is 45 miles a day at 60mph.

Last edited by volk06; 10/16/19 10:05 AM.
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241248 10/16/19 10:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,966
bdcardinal Online Content
Online Content
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 13,966
I went through this same thing with my mom's Fusion. Same tire options but in a 235/40VR19. I ended up with the Michelins.


2014 Ford Mustang GT Track Pack
1995 Ford Mustang GT

Ford/Mazda Parts Counter
NRA Benefactor Member
Opinions expressed are my own.
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241274 10/16/19 10:30 AM
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 436
D
dubber09 Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 436
I'd skip both and go for General G-Max AS-05 laugh
Great tires, first hand experience.


Kia Sportage 2014 GDI 2.4L
Kia Forte 2014 MPI 1.8L
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241278 10/16/19 10:34 AM
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 457
P
painfx Offline
Offline
P
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 457
Originally Posted by JMHC
I need new tires for my Camry, and the car came with the Michelin Primacy MXM4's. They have lasted about 45,000 miles, have been pretty quiet, and have done well in all weather conditions here in Ohio. I had a car in the past with the original Continental Purecontacts, and I thought they were really great in rain and snow. The only issue was that they quickly developed a humming noise that was pretty annoying. I can get the new Purecontact LS's for about $200 less installed than the Michelins. I really like the Michelins, but I wouldn't mind saving $200. I would absolutely try the Conti's, my only issue are some reviews indicate they wear fast and are pretty noisy. I've read mixed reviews on them, some people say they are quiet, some say they are loud. Does anyone have any long-term experience with them, or had them and the Primacy's for comparison? Thanks.


What year is your Camry?

I too am researching on the MXM4 vs PureContact LS. Not sure which is better....

Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241284 10/16/19 10:42 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 176
J
JMHC Offline OP
OP Offline
J
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 176
It's a 2015 XSE V6. 225/45/18.


1998 Pontiac Trans Am
2015 Toyota Camry V6 XSE
2009 Toyota RAV4 4WD 2.5
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241295 10/16/19 10:52 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,729
SubieRubyRoo Offline
Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,729
Check out the TrueContact Tours if they are available in your size. They've been reworked from the original design for longer treadwear, I think some are now rated 800 or 840 on the UTWG. I've had 3 sets of the TrueContacts with zero problems, and will buy more. Great tire for the money.... I had around 66k on the set on my Fusion when I sold it and it still had 6/32nds depth so I'm not sure how some people reported lots of wear in a short time. The other two sets are in the mid-20ks with no problems.


De omnibus dubitandum.
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241298 10/16/19 10:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 11
J
Jmlo96 Offline
Offline
J
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 11
I have the PureContact LS on my Cruze. Those Michelins don't have anything on the Contis. The PureContact LS is one of the quietest and smoothest riding tires I've owned. Wet and dry traction is stupid good. I've driven through a road having water puddle during a rainstorm and it was like driving on a dry road. The thing that blows my mind is that these tires feel like performance tires in the corners. I had the first gen PureContacts on this same car, and while the PureContacts were great, the PureContact LS fixes every complaint I had.

On 2 of our other cars we have the General RT43 and the General G-Max AS05 and while they are great tires, the Conti kicks it up a notch. Especially in ride comfort and noise.

I've driven new cars with stock Michelin MXM4s and they didn't have anywhere near the wet and snow traction of even the first gen PureContacts.

Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241316 10/16/19 11:36 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 553
P
pezzy669 Offline
Offline
P
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 553
I am highly biased towards Michelins (sans Premier A/S - low tread depth from the get go and poor wear). The Primacy MXM4 has excellent reviews online so I would lean towards those. I had Continental ProContact's on a prior Jetta and they got noisy around the 20k mark.

Last edited by pezzy669; 10/16/19 11:37 AM.

2012 Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen TDI - 69k - Castrol Edge Professional LL03 5W30
2011 Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen TDI - 49k - Castrol Edge Professional LL03 5W30
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: Jmlo96] #5241318 10/16/19 11:39 AM
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 457
P
painfx Offline
Offline
P
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 457
Originally Posted by Jmlo96
I have the PureContact LS on my Cruze. Those Michelins don't have anything on the Contis. The PureContact LS is one of the quietest and smoothest riding tires I've owned. Wet and dry traction is stupid good. I've driven through a road having water puddle during a rainstorm and it was like driving on a dry road. The thing that blows my mind is that these tires feel like performance tires in the corners. I had the first gen PureContacts on this same car, and while the PureContacts were great, the PureContact LS fixes every complaint I had.

On 2 of our other cars we have the General RT43 and the General G-Max AS05 and while they are great tires, the Conti kicks it up a notch. Especially in ride comfort and noise.

I've driven new cars with stock Michelin MXM4s and they didn't have anywhere near the wet and snow traction of even the first gen PureContacts.


It is true that the PureContact LS has better ratings on TireRack.

But my main concern besides those would be tire noise over time and are the sidewalls are softer compared to the MXM4?

BTW, stock MXM4 cannot be compared because they have many versions of the MXM4. The one that is good is the one with the traction rating of "AA" 96V XL.

Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241326 10/16/19 11:51 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,488
N
nthach Offline
Offline
N
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,488
The Primacy MXM4 is a "old" but still good tire. It was introduced in 2009-2010 just after the Primacy MXV4 which I thought was a vast improvement over the Energy MXV4 series. Michelin made the Pilot MXM4 but it's a OEM-level "premium" tire.

Michelins aren't as noisy compared to a Conti when they get older and worn down. I've heard good things about the Contis, and according to TireRack they also aren't too bad in the snow - since Cleveland does see snow in the winter. It won't be as good as a true winter tire of course.

Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: painfx] #5241348 10/16/19 12:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 176
J
JMHC Offline OP
OP Offline
J
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 176
Originally Posted by painfx
Originally Posted by Jmlo96
I have the PureContact LS on my Cruze. Those Michelins don't have anything on the Contis. The PureContact LS is one of the quietest and smoothest riding tires I've owned. Wet and dry traction is stupid good. I've driven through a road having water puddle during a rainstorm and it was like driving on a dry road. The thing that blows my mind is that these tires feel like performance tires in the corners. I had the first gen PureContacts on this same car, and while the PureContacts were great, the PureContact LS fixes every complaint I had.

On 2 of our other cars we have the General RT43 and the General G-Max AS05 and while they are great tires, the Conti kicks it up a notch. Especially in ride comfort and noise.

I've driven new cars with stock Michelin MXM4s and they didn't have anywhere near the wet and snow traction of even the first gen PureContacts.


It is true that the PureContact LS has better ratings on TireRack.

But my main concern besides those would be tire noise over time and are the sidewalls are softer compared to the MXM4?

BTW, stock MXM4 cannot be compared because they have many versions of the MXM4. The one that is good is the one with the traction rating of "AA" 96V XL.


That's my concern as well. According to TireRack tests the Conti should grip better, especially in rain and snow, but it sure seems there is a possibility it will make more noise. The Michelins aren't amazing, but they do everything well while being very smooth and quiet even at higher speeds.


1998 Pontiac Trans Am
2015 Toyota Camry V6 XSE
2009 Toyota RAV4 4WD 2.5
Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241353 10/16/19 12:17 PM
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 457
P
painfx Offline
Offline
P
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 457
Originally Posted by JMHC
Originally Posted by painfx
Originally Posted by Jmlo96
I have the PureContact LS on my Cruze. Those Michelins don't have anything on the Contis. The PureContact LS is one of the quietest and smoothest riding tires I've owned. Wet and dry traction is stupid good. I've driven through a road having water puddle during a rainstorm and it was like driving on a dry road. The thing that blows my mind is that these tires feel like performance tires in the corners. I had the first gen PureContacts on this same car, and while the PureContacts were great, the PureContact LS fixes every complaint I had.

On 2 of our other cars we have the General RT43 and the General G-Max AS05 and while they are great tires, the Conti kicks it up a notch. Especially in ride comfort and noise.

I've driven new cars with stock Michelin MXM4s and they didn't have anywhere near the wet and snow traction of even the first gen PureContacts.


It is true that the PureContact LS has better ratings on TireRack.

But my main concern besides those would be tire noise over time and are the sidewalls are softer compared to the MXM4?

BTW, stock MXM4 cannot be compared because they have many versions of the MXM4. The one that is good is the one with the traction rating of "AA" 96V XL.


That's my concern as well. According to TireRack tests the Conti should grip better, especially in rain and snow, but it sure seems there is a possibility it will make more noise. The Michelins aren't amazing, but they do everything well while being very smooth and quiet even at higher speeds.


Yep. And we still cant get a definitely answer. This question has been lingering on google for many years. They never posted an update.

Re: Continental Purecontact LS vs. Michelin Primacy MXM4 [Re: JMHC] #5241557 10/16/19 03:28 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,045
G
Gebo Offline
Offline
G
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,045
You got the Primacy Tour A/S and the Primacy MXM4 as what I consider the only two Michelin choices (Premier A/S is a possibility)

I think the Tour A/S is the newer but the MXM4 has been tried and proven.


'98 LEX LS400 305K
'02 4Runner 250K
'05 Lex LS430 90K
'07 Lex GX470 70K

Shell Gas and Truck 5W-30
QS HM 10W-30
Toyota ATF's and Coolant
Amsoil Gear Oil and Grease
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™