Recent Topics
Intel or AMD Processor
by ZeeOSix - 02/28/20 04:02 AM
Denso Reman Starter Noise
by The Critic - 02/28/20 02:59 AM
Gratitude
by rrretiree7 - 02/27/20 11:56 PM
Maxlife for 35yo Ford C6
by Cubey - 02/27/20 11:35 PM
New 2-post lift on order
by clinebarger - 02/27/20 11:07 PM
New F-150 2.7 EB recommendations?
by mattri - 02/27/20 09:37 PM
Honey I bought a set of wheels
by P10crew - 02/27/20 09:29 PM
PQIA Pennzoil Hybrid 0W-16
by kstanf150 - 02/27/20 08:32 PM
100,000 ducks sent to Pakistan.
by Vern_in_IL - 02/27/20 08:07 PM
06 Camry Coolant??
by Jcountry - 02/27/20 07:54 PM
PQIA Kirkland 5W-30 synthetic
by kstanf150 - 02/27/20 07:43 PM
401 K took a beating!
by P10crew - 02/27/20 07:30 PM
Coolant Level
by rrretiree7 - 02/27/20 07:21 PM
Techron BOGO at O'Reilly
by TheLawnRanger - 02/27/20 06:26 PM
"Follow Thread" not working anymore?
by atikovi - 02/27/20 06:25 PM
What happened at Hyundai dealers
by WhyMe - 02/27/20 06:23 PM
Using ramps for oil change?
by superfat_dad - 02/27/20 06:03 PM
Ford to reduce warranty costs ?
by marine65 - 02/27/20 06:02 PM
Newest Members
hogryder007, Sabbag77, RpR, jameswilliam, Agraz400
70819 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
61 registered members (Astro_Guy, AurionX2, alarmguy, 2010Civic, bachman, Amkeer, 10 invisible), 1,118 guests, and 18 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics302,027
Posts5,207,528
Members70,819
Most Online4,538
Jan 20th, 2020
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Lower octane at higher altitude... #5169033 07/23/19 02:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,842
Z
ZZman Offline OP
OP Offline
Z
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,842
Visiting my daughter in Colorado and just realized they sell 85, 87 and 91 octane. In Michigan they sell 87, 89 and 93 octane. Had to look up why.


2007 Hyundai Santa Fe AWD.
2005 Toyota Avalon XLS
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169036 07/23/19 02:47 PM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,678
V
Virtus_Probi Offline
Offline
V
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,678
I think I thought the 85 octane was E85 the first time I drove in Colorado...visited there years ago but was either just tagging along with friends or being driven by salesmen.


2014 Forester XT, 111000 miles
Last Change;
M1 0W30 AFE
Tokyo Roki 15208AA170 filter
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169043 07/23/19 02:53 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,501
R
RamFan Offline
Offline
R
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,501
Yup, I brought this up several years ago on here and from what I remember was told that (essentially) the air being thinner due to the increased altitude allows for a lower octane to be run. I remember even seeing a few stations with 85.5 octane, threw me for a loop.


18 Giulia Ti Sport Q4
  • 2.0T I4 - 24k - PP Euro LX 0w30 - PureOne - 10k/1yr

16.5 CX-5 Touring AWD
  • 2.5L I4 - 68k - Castrol Edge EP 0w20 - Denso - 7.5k/1yr
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169044 07/23/19 02:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,198
B
Boomer Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,198
Lower air pressure at altitude so less air to compress in the cylinder...less heat from compression . Therefore lower octane is what is used.


2019 VW Passat 2.0 liter gasoline DI engine, DI, 2,700 miles, Castrol Professional VW 508 0W-20
2017 VW Golf All Track 1.8 liter gas engine DI, 25,500 miles Castrol Professional VW 505 5W-40
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169053 07/23/19 03:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,489
R
Rand Offline
Offline
R
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,489
Thats all fine except when your owners manual says 87 min.. or you are changing elevation daily.


2019 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.0T
2020 Hyundai Elantra "Value Edition"
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169058 07/23/19 03:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,480
B
Burt Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,480
One time I drove from Nebraska to Denver and by the time I got out of state I was having problems with vapor lock. I assumed that it was something to do with gas for low elevations having boiling point problems in high elevation, hot weather.


2011 RX350 63k miles
2015 Fiesta SFE eco-boost 34k miles
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: Rand] #5169074 07/23/19 03:40 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,501
R
RamFan Offline
Offline
R
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,501
Originally Posted by Rand
Thats all fine except when your owners manual says 87 min.. or you are changing elevation daily.


Do manuals ever recommend a minimum lower than 87? I can't say I've ever seen this personally.


18 Giulia Ti Sport Q4
  • 2.0T I4 - 24k - PP Euro LX 0w30 - PureOne - 10k/1yr

16.5 CX-5 Touring AWD
  • 2.5L I4 - 68k - Castrol Edge EP 0w20 - Denso - 7.5k/1yr
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169089 07/23/19 04:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,193
C
c502cid Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,193
For a long time it was 85/87/89 here. It was raised when the higher performance engines required 91 no matter what the altitude. Pretty much same goes for 87 here now on many if not most modern cars. My 2000 Blazer runs no different on 85 than on 87. The 2015 Trax it makes a huge difference.



15 Chev Trax AWD
02 GMC 3500 8.1/Ally DRW 4x4
00 Blazer 4.3 4x4
97/98 Civics
84 Chev K30 454EFI/T400/NP205 DRW 4x4
71 GMC Jimmy 502 RamJet/T400/NP205 4x4
08 Kawi Brute Force 750
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169106 07/23/19 04:32 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,553
K
Kestas Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
K
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,553
Don't turbos make the effect of altitude a moot point?

Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: Kestas] #5169115 07/23/19 04:41 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,021
9
92saturnsl2 Offline
Offline
9
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,021
Originally Posted by Kestas
Don't turbos make the effect of altitude a moot point?


Based on personal experience, I would say not entirely. I lived in Colorado Springs for many years (6500 feet) and also in the midwest and New England. I drove my '09 Caliber SRT4 back and forth to Colorado quite a bit (lived in IL at the time) and despite being turbocharged there was a noticeable loss of power at higher elevation. Also owned a supercharged vehicle & plenty of N/A cars that I've driven back and forth. Of all, the supercharged car ('00 Pontiac Bonneville w/ 3.8L S/C) suffered the worst at high elevation, the N/A cars are seriously noticeable too, and the turbo only mildly noticeable. Just got back from visiting CO last weekend. I'm always amazed at the difference in power-- I can cruise around at 2-3k RPM effortlessly here in almost any driving condition, but there requires frequent pulls to 4.5k for "normal" driving.

All owners manuals I've ever come across say 87 minimum. I recall seeing one or two that stated an exception for high altitude use, but not all have this. I had always run 85 in my N/A vehicles and never noticed a difference. If I'm traveling out of state to lower elevation, I fill up with 87 before leaving. The switchover (going east) to 87 octane occurs shortly after the Kansas border, around 4000-4500 ft. elevation.


96 Grand Prix SE (project car)
04 Odyssey EX 200k Philips Shield Choice 10w-30
96 Maxima GLE 275k Shell Rotella T5 10w-30
07 Chrysler Pacifica Limited 4.0L 145k Mobil1 EP 0w-20
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: Kestas] #5169136 07/23/19 05:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,289
A
ammolab Offline
Offline
A
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,289
Originally Posted by Kestas
Don't turbos make the effect of altitude a moot point?


Many turbos make a max boost (say + 13 psi) but this is 13 psi above ambient (atmospheric pressure at your location). Which might be 14.7 in Houston...but at my house only 10.4 psi (7000ft asl)


1998 Jeep Cherokee
2011 BMW R1200R
2005 Kaw Ninja 250
1994 Jeep Wrangler 2.5L
2016 Chevy SS Sport Sedan
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ammolab] #5169367 07/23/19 10:29 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,043
Y
y_p_w Offline
Offline
Y
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,043
Originally Posted by ammolab
Originally Posted by Kestas
Don't turbos make the effect of altitude a moot point?


Many turbos make a max boost (say + 13 psi) but this is 13 psi above ambient (atmospheric pressure at your location). Which might be 14.7 in Houston...but at my house only 10.4 psi (7000ft asl)

Sure. As a combination of boost and normal air intake it's not going to be as much total air. Also turbos should spool up to the max boost, but won't it take a bit longer to reach that pressure?

Still - one of the most important applications for a turbo is in aircraft engines, where they're obviously going to be dealing with higher altitudes and thinner air. I remember the General Electric ad touting their testing of a turbocharged aircraft engine on Pikes Peak back around 1918. This article mentions that test:

https://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/hill-climb-2023375/?page=1

Apparently the problem was that it worked too well at low altitude and during testing they failed because of detonation and spark plug failure. But the real environment would be at altitude and Pikes Peak had a road to the top to haul it. Must have been before knock sensors and electronic controls.

Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169426 07/24/19 04:40 AM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 9,878
L
Linctex Offline
Offline
L
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 9,878
Originally Posted by y_p_w
I remember the General Electric ad touting their testing of a turbocharged aircraft engine on Pikes Peak back around 1918. This article mentions that test:
https://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/hill-climb-2023375/?page=1

Apparently the problem was that it worked too well at low altitude and during testing they failed because of detonation and spark plug failure.

Must have been before knock sensors and electronic controls.


All they had to do was monitor their manifold pressure.... Of course, they figured it out eventually


"The evidence demands a verdict".
(Re:VOA)"it's nearly impossible to actually know the particular additives that are in there at what concentrations."
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169498 07/24/19 07:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,686
W
WyrTwister Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,686
I remember reading of high altitude car & truck engines that had higher compression ratios . And carburetors being adjusted differently for high altitude .


Wyr
God bless
Re: Lower octane at higher altitude... [Re: ZZman] #5169501 07/24/19 07:13 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,193
C
c502cid Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,193
Not sure why but I ran the Trax when new on 85 for a solid year. I re-read the manual and decided to try to 87. My wife, who is the primary driver, noticed quickly how much difference it made, and I didn't tell her I did a thing. When I drove it, well the computer must have been pulling a lot of timing, turbo or not, because it changed that engine for the better. 91 makes no difference that I can tell.



15 Chev Trax AWD
02 GMC 3500 8.1/Ally DRW 4x4
00 Blazer 4.3 4x4
97/98 Civics
84 Chev K30 454EFI/T400/NP205 DRW 4x4
71 GMC Jimmy 502 RamJet/T400/NP205 4x4
08 Kawi Brute Force 750
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™