I literally created my account just to reply to this thread and combat a very dangerous and ignorant idea I saw here.
The intake manifold does NOT act as a heat sink for Saab 9-3 ECUs. After 15 minutes of driving the ECU's external temperature is 90 degrees F, while the intake header is at about 130 degrees. Do the math. The intake continues to rise as the vehicle runs and the ECU always follows it. Here's another experiment. If you shut off your car, the ECU will continue to climb in temperature until it finally reaches the temp of the intake. Then both will slowly cool together. If you remove the ECU, it will cool to room temperature fairly quickly. Hence, the internal ECU components are not the dominant heat source.
In summary, the much hotter intake manifold is BY NO MEANS a heat-sink for the ECU. The intense heat and vibration of the intake header is why the 9-3 ECUs die so quickly!!! There is even a small private market of cooling solutions for the ECU. Most common are plates with spacers to offset the ECU from the header. In Taiwan and China people even re-locate the ECU to the front subframe near the radiator. Nylon spacers, as long as they can handle the engine temp, should be fine. When I get my new ECU (old one overheated while bolted to intake) I'm going to relocate to the frame and might even add a CPU fan just to be stupid safe. I would relocate all the way to the airbox or battery if wiring was less of a pain.
Please, for the love of all Saabs, do NOT discourage people from protecting their ECUs as supton has done. Intake headers are not ECU heat sinks!!!
P.S. if you do offset your ECU, make sure to firmly re-attach the ground wire. I've seen people forget about that and it doesn't end well.