PP - GF-6 Ready?
- Thread starter buster
- Start date
- Status
Originally Posted by PimTac
I'm sure every oil company is doing the same thing. Shell decided to promote it.
There Is a lot of legalese in that statement.
Not really it just states GF-6 standards are not formerly defined but when it is PP meets it.
I'm sure every oil company is doing the same thing. Shell decided to promote it.
There Is a lot of legalese in that statement.
Not really it just states GF-6 standards are not formerly defined but when it is PP meets it.
Great find buster...much appreciated.
This place will go bonkers when GF-6 hits.
Then we can debate over GF-6A vs GF-6B,
in our endless quest to select the best oil + value for our sleds.
This place will go bonkers when GF-6 hits.
Then we can debate over GF-6A vs GF-6B,
in our endless quest to select the best oil + value for our sleds.
Originally Posted by addyguy
I don't think GF-6A will be much different than GF-5.
It will include coverage for LSPI.
Given that so many oils are d1G2 and/or SN+ already and those have LSPI tests, I'd guess there won't be a giant rush to reformulate like there was for d1G2 (excepting most M1 flavors).
I don't think GF-6A will be much different than GF-5.
It will include coverage for LSPI.
Given that so many oils are d1G2 and/or SN+ already and those have LSPI tests, I'd guess there won't be a giant rush to reformulate like there was for d1G2 (excepting most M1 flavors).
- Status
Similar threads
