I was chatting with someone this weekend who made a statement that's different than how I understood car alternators -vs the old generators that cars were equipped with function.
He said that the alternators of today shouldn't be thought if as "battery chargers"; he said alternators are really only intended to power the cars' electrical system, and even then only at higher than idle RPMs. He said that it's very likely, especially if a car is driving at low RPM as in stop and go traffic, that the battery is actually subsidizing the output of the alternator to keep the car running and is, therefore, slowly discharging your battery! He said the typical alternator *can* keep a healthy battery charged, but only at higher than idle RPMs.
I've always thought that was the major advantage of alternators -vs the old generators (remembering my old, VW bug) in that alternators produced full output, even at idle, but generators DO produce more power as the RPMs climb.
Am I wrong?
Thank you,
Ed
He said that the alternators of today shouldn't be thought if as "battery chargers"; he said alternators are really only intended to power the cars' electrical system, and even then only at higher than idle RPMs. He said that it's very likely, especially if a car is driving at low RPM as in stop and go traffic, that the battery is actually subsidizing the output of the alternator to keep the car running and is, therefore, slowly discharging your battery! He said the typical alternator *can* keep a healthy battery charged, but only at higher than idle RPMs.
I've always thought that was the major advantage of alternators -vs the old generators (remembering my old, VW bug) in that alternators produced full output, even at idle, but generators DO produce more power as the RPMs climb.
Am I wrong?
Thank you,
Ed