There was some discussion in this sub-forum two or three months ago as to whether Honda's DW-1 (_NOT_ the clones, the actual Honda-branded fluid) is formulated with little to no phosphorus. See here.
So, I decided to run a VOA on some I bought from my local Honda dealer from whom I buy lots of stuff. Here's what I got:
Fe: 0
Cr: 0
Pb: 0
Sn: 0
Al: 0
Ni: 0
Ag: 0
Si: 3
K: 1
Na: 1
B: 278
Mg: 228
Ca: 376
Ba: 0
Zn: 361
Mo: 0
Ti: 0
V: 1
Visc (100C): 7.5 cSt
As we see, this is _not_ a zero-phos formulation. At the same time, it is certainly a very low-phos formulation. This is in apparent contrast to pretty well all contemporary ATFs intended for use in new-design (step-shift) A/Ts.
I'd be curious for the thoughts of the formulators here as to what Honda's goals might be here.
So, I decided to run a VOA on some I bought from my local Honda dealer from whom I buy lots of stuff. Here's what I got:
Fe: 0
Cr: 0
Pb: 0
Sn: 0
Al: 0
Ni: 0
Ag: 0
Si: 3
K: 1
Na: 1
B: 278
Mg: 228
Ca: 376
Ba: 0
Zn: 361
Mo: 0
Ti: 0
V: 1
Visc (100C): 7.5 cSt
As we see, this is _not_ a zero-phos formulation. At the same time, it is certainly a very low-phos formulation. This is in apparent contrast to pretty well all contemporary ATFs intended for use in new-design (step-shift) A/Ts.
I'd be curious for the thoughts of the formulators here as to what Honda's goals might be here.