AZjeff
$50 Site Donor 2023
Originally Posted by 02SE
Originally Posted by AZjeff
Originally Posted by 02SE
You wouldn't happen to be Lee Schismenos would you?
Arizona driver assaults Motorcyclist and small woman passenger
That's all you've got? No good response to the points I raised so you want to paint me as violent? Weak.
Enjoy your lane splitting and filtering. Sincerely hope you don't get hurt doing it.
You didn't raise any valid points. People will either obey the law, or they won't. No different than any other law.
Your annoyance at the possibility of Motorcyclists legally lane filtering, lane splitting, or lane sharing, makes you sound a lot like Schismenos. I just wondered if it was you.
Yeah, got nothing. The riders that have responded in this thread not afraid to view splitting and filtering rationally confirm my points are not wrong. The selling points about helping congestion are just selling points with little real world effect and the real benefit is to the riders not the vehicle drivers. Other riders mentioned how much time it saves them on a commute or trip, again no concern if there's any benefit to everyone else on the road. Admit that it's a unilateral win for motorcycles.
NHTSA says this: Motorcycles made up 3 percent of all registered vehicles in the United States in 2013 and accounted for only 0.7 percent of all vehicle miles traveled. Being generous with this stat say there are 3 bikes for every 97 other cars & trucks in traffic. You really think those 3 bikes going to the front make any difference to the car sitting at #98? No, but it sure makes a difference to the rider that was #100 in traffic now sitting at the front. Just admit it's a nice win for you and pretty meaningless to the other 99.3% of the driving public.
The point about being last in line in stopped traffic is valid, it makes anyone nervous until a few other cars are behind you. If I pulled up to the back of a line and a bike came up and pulled along side my truck and stopped I'd know exactly what he was doing and it wouldn't bother me a bit. Would probably give him a gap to pull into when the line started moving. No real need to ride to the front to be safe.
Motorcyclist's concerns about it being more dangerous on the roads today are very valid. It seems like introducing a new motorcycle behavior into traffic that the public has never seen could be more dangerous to riders not less. Then after you get your resident drivers used to the new behavior you have a never ending stream of drivers from other states who have never seen filtering or (you hope) splitting. This happened to us the first time we drove to Ca to visit our daughter, never saw splitting before and it was startling and unnerving. Heaven help the poor driver who's trying to change lanes in slow or stopped traffic and blocks the filtering lane. We saw this happen just ahead and the rider who had to stop wasn't nice.
Your inability to rationally defend filtering as universally beneficial and your continued insinuations about my character speak volumes.
Originally Posted by AZjeff
Originally Posted by 02SE
You wouldn't happen to be Lee Schismenos would you?
Arizona driver assaults Motorcyclist and small woman passenger
That's all you've got? No good response to the points I raised so you want to paint me as violent? Weak.
Enjoy your lane splitting and filtering. Sincerely hope you don't get hurt doing it.
You didn't raise any valid points. People will either obey the law, or they won't. No different than any other law.
Your annoyance at the possibility of Motorcyclists legally lane filtering, lane splitting, or lane sharing, makes you sound a lot like Schismenos. I just wondered if it was you.
Yeah, got nothing. The riders that have responded in this thread not afraid to view splitting and filtering rationally confirm my points are not wrong. The selling points about helping congestion are just selling points with little real world effect and the real benefit is to the riders not the vehicle drivers. Other riders mentioned how much time it saves them on a commute or trip, again no concern if there's any benefit to everyone else on the road. Admit that it's a unilateral win for motorcycles.
NHTSA says this: Motorcycles made up 3 percent of all registered vehicles in the United States in 2013 and accounted for only 0.7 percent of all vehicle miles traveled. Being generous with this stat say there are 3 bikes for every 97 other cars & trucks in traffic. You really think those 3 bikes going to the front make any difference to the car sitting at #98? No, but it sure makes a difference to the rider that was #100 in traffic now sitting at the front. Just admit it's a nice win for you and pretty meaningless to the other 99.3% of the driving public.
The point about being last in line in stopped traffic is valid, it makes anyone nervous until a few other cars are behind you. If I pulled up to the back of a line and a bike came up and pulled along side my truck and stopped I'd know exactly what he was doing and it wouldn't bother me a bit. Would probably give him a gap to pull into when the line started moving. No real need to ride to the front to be safe.
Motorcyclist's concerns about it being more dangerous on the roads today are very valid. It seems like introducing a new motorcycle behavior into traffic that the public has never seen could be more dangerous to riders not less. Then after you get your resident drivers used to the new behavior you have a never ending stream of drivers from other states who have never seen filtering or (you hope) splitting. This happened to us the first time we drove to Ca to visit our daughter, never saw splitting before and it was startling and unnerving. Heaven help the poor driver who's trying to change lanes in slow or stopped traffic and blocks the filtering lane. We saw this happen just ahead and the rider who had to stop wasn't nice.
Your inability to rationally defend filtering as universally beneficial and your continued insinuations about my character speak volumes.