Illinois 15 dollar/hr incremental raise

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd rather have minimum wage at $15 than support Walmarts employees on welfare. If a can of corn does up 5 cents then so be it. Walmart spending 10's of billions on stock buy backs while we feed their workers is not good for anyone other than the Walton family.
Money flows up way more reliably than it trickles down.
 
My first job at 16 was pumping gas at the minimum wage of $ 1.25/hour. I could not have supported a family on that income, but that was not the expectation: a minimum wage job was no more than a way to gain experience and act as a stepping-stone to something better. It worked. Not sure what the career path will be for young Illinoisans now.
 
Originally Posted by OVERKILL
Originally Posted by StevieC
But with Minimum wage earners spending back into the economy at higher rates proportional to their income than CEO's would it make sense that it would drive middle class jobs and thus we would feed the CEO's and wealthy elites? It's a ladder effect right?

We are stalling out because the lower classes are broke.

It's no anomaly that the economy has increased debt load largely at the same time wages have been stagnant and living costs have increased. We can't fix the problem without investment.

You wouldn't expect a return from a bank or financial advisor without investing first would you? They broke the investment loop with cheap offshore labour and then broke it further by stagnating wages when sales missed expectations from breaking it the first time by offshoring things. So their answer? Cut further and this cycle continues but they don't realize one feeds the other.
21.gif


MADNESS! Definition of insanity is expecting different results without changing anything right?
wink.gif




Yup. "Back in the day" before the offshoring, you had a very large pool of people who were all invested in the various stages of production and procurement. Those that worked in manufacturing could and would buy the products they made. The paradigm shift occurred, as you noted, with the offshoring of manufacturing. That previously generous base contracted, those well-paying jobs disappeared, and these were replaced by the "greeter" and "McJob" and so you had a group with significantly less buying power spending more of what they had just to live. These folks could no longer afford to buy the products they used to make and the responsibility of that procurement shifted up the ladder a rung, landing on those only a bit better off than those other folk. Prices increased, but wages didn't. At the same time, the cheapening of products being offshored drove up consumption and this resulted in the "Walmartization" of society. To continue to boost profits, selling more junk was a better business model than selling fewer quality goods and it was discovered that people would be surprisingly tolerant of buying garbage with a reasonably short lifespan.

Low interest rates to spur consumption and maintain momentum has allowed for price growth to significantly outpace wage growth. Terms have gotten longer and have allowed those stuck in the wage rut to buy more "stuff". Because the system needs people buying "stuff" at an ever increasing rate in order to not implode.

You are 100% right that the "system" was broken with the ability exploit cheap 3rd world labour. It took a sawzall to the bottom of the ladder and now it doesn't work properly.


So, what is the "fix" in a nutshell?

-Move away from globalization/off-shoring/cheap labor
-stop the rapid inflation to increase purchasing power, increasing wages seems to be putting the cart before the horse?
-Stop taxpayer funding of meth mike and his bro-dozer so he actually has to get a job and be a productive member of society?
-Roughly half the "budget" in the US looks to be supporting nonsense like meth-Mike, driving up the insane national debt, decreasing the value of the dollar, meaning more social welfare is "needed", rinse repeat.

It would seem we are in a pickle.
smile.gif
Can anything be done besides/before a crash and reset of the system?
 
Originally Posted by dbias
I'd rather have minimum wage at $15 than support Walmarts employees on welfare. If a can of corn does up 5 cents then so be it.

Minimum wage at $15 means the people who were working 40 hours a week at $10 will now work 25 hours a week so they can stay under the income cap to maintain their welfare eligibility.
 
This is phased in over 6 years. As much as I don't like government mandating salary, I'm going to be OK with the law. People are going to require higher salaries due to the high tax burden this state saddles us with. [Additional thoughts redacted]
 
Originally Posted by SOHCman
Can anything be done besides/before a crash and reset of the system?

You're going to get the crash regardless. As far as the "reset" depends on how smart the players are afterward. Right now I wouldn't bank on it. If they can't understand why socialism doesn't work now, they won't be any smarter after they see it fail...... Again. You have failed examples of it everywhere. Yet they still continue to cheerlead for it.
 
Originally Posted by billt460
Originally Posted by SOHCman
Can anything be done besides/before a crash and reset of the system?

You're going to get the crash regardless. As far as the "reset" depends on how smart the players are afterward. Right now I wouldn't bank on it. If they can't understand why socialism doesn't work now, they won't be any smarter after they see it fail...... Again. You have failed examples of it everywhere. Yet they still continue to cheerlead for it.


What socialism? You wouldn't recognize socialism if it slapped you in the face. The US is as close to socialism as a monkey is close to your local congressman.
 
Originally Posted by wwillson
Should we just lock now?

This is the way I see it, and this can be generalized beyond the current topic.

Anything done by government has political aspects by definition.
Discussions of how to live on minimum wage or comply with minimum wage, etc. are not political.
Discussions of the merits or necessity of government mandated minimum wage are inherently political.
Discussions of general economic effects or comparisons of different schemes are sort of gray area, but veer off into the political as soon as any position or action is espoused.

Personally, I don't think it's an issue as long as it doesn't degenerate into ideology and partisan bickering. Some controversial topics do this inevitably.
 
Originally Posted by Alfred_B
Originally Posted by billt460
Originally Posted by SOHCman
Can anything be done besides/before a crash and reset of the system?

You're going to get the crash regardless. As far as the "reset" depends on how smart the players are afterward. Right now I wouldn't bank on it. If they can't understand why socialism doesn't work now, they won't be any smarter after they see it fail...... Again. You have failed examples of it everywhere. Yet they still continue to cheerlead for it.


What socialism? You wouldn't recognize socialism if it slapped you in the face. The US is as close to socialism as a monkey is close to your local congressman.

While this is delivered kind of rough, I lived trough actual red comunism, and I agree.
Most folks here don't understand how good they have it compared with many other parts of the world....
 
It's funny that people are saying that the jobs are going to disappear, but unemployment is down to 4%. During the last recession, it was over 10%. Unemployment has been dropping for the last couple years. Jobs always get eliminated and new ones get created. When their jobs are eliminated, they can be retrained for new jobs.
 
Originally Posted by DejaVue

Minimum wage at $15 means the people who were working 40 hours a week at $10 will now work 25 hours a week so they can stay under the income cap to maintain their welfare eligibility.



This 100%.
 
Originally Posted by jeepman3071
Originally Posted by DejaVue

Minimum wage at $15 means the people who were working 40 hours a week at $10 will now work 25 hours a week so they can stay under the income cap to maintain their welfare eligibility.



This 100%.


You guys are a bit too cynical. Not all employers let full time employees shift to part time work.

A few of my rentals I take section 8 tenants, a few of them actually got off after a few years.

But remember, no matter how cynical you get, you just can't keep up.
 
Originally Posted by Alfred_B
What socialism? You wouldn't recognize socialism if it slapped you in the face. The US is as close to socialism as a monkey is close to your local congressman.

I'm not sure what to make of that? Seeing as commenting any further would either get this thread locked, me banned, or all of the above.
 
Originally Posted by pandus13
Most folks here don't understand how good they have it compared with many other parts of the world....

Now yes. That doesn't mean it's going to be that way forever if we keep going in the direction we're headed.
 
Originally Posted by dbias
I'd rather have minimum wage at $15 than support Walmarts employees on welfare. If a can of corn does up 5 cents then so be it. Walmart spending 10's of billions on stock buy backs while we feed their workers is not good for anyone other than the Walton family.
Money flows up way more reliably than it trickles down.

What about your grocery bill ?

$11.50 min wage is reasonable.
 
I think every time min wage goes up, so should everyone else's income, by the same amount, otherwise it diminishes the value of the training and experience gained by those who did so to better their careers...
 
Originally Posted by grampi
I think every time min wage goes up, so should everyone else's income, by the same amount, otherwise it diminishes the value of the training and experience gained by those who did so to better their careers...


I can sort of agree with this. The "minimum" wage gets talked about the most, but really most American wages have been stagnant for a long time. I don't know what the minimum wage should be, but I know it shouldn't be $7.25. I made $7.15 in highschool. Which factoring in taxes and working part time made it barely worth it
lol.gif


Quote
today's real average wage (that is, the wage after accounting for inflation) has about the same purchasing power it did 40 years ago.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...al-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/
 
I think all wages should be tied to inflation so that you get automatic increases every year for just this amount and then merit increases on top of it if you earned it. I think this would have staved off the huge amount of debt we have today in the markets where wages haven't kept up with costs so people use cheap credit to make up the difference hoping it will get better. (Hope is not a strategy).

I think then if minimum wage was fixed to the right level and then maintained with inflation then the other folks above wouldn't have to worry because everything would proportionally stay the same as they would also be getting inflationary increases.

I've worked for companies that give you a 2,3,4% bump automatically but this is rare, at least here.

Problem is this isn't the case and employers will look for every way to pay as little as possible because labour is a big expense and they are all about efficiencies because that drives profits higher and because they have to pay out to shareholders etc.

They don't realize it's this short-term thinking that limits their profits long-term to a degree because the market can't go around without the flow of money and it's being strangled at the top by corporations and the wealthy.

I'm all for wealthy folks enjoying more than the rest but the lower folks need to eat too and right now they are fighting over crumbs and using credit to buy those crumbs while the top end is eating the whole pie and asking for more and that is going to be disastrous for everyone when it finally catches up with the market! I don't think we are too far from this IMO.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a lot of people believe in screwing the poor and low income people. Who says fast food or other "lowly" jobs aren't worth more money? Try working one and see if it isn't work. Some of the hardest "workers" make low wages.

If you aren't going to agree to pay decent wages then don't complain if they need a safety net to help them. The jobs need filling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top