Originally Posted by krismoriah72
"My test data is the real deal, it exactly matches real world experience, and it is the best and most complete motor oil comparison data you will ever find anywhere."
"A high level of zinc/phos is simply no guarantee of providing sufficient wear protection. And to make matters even worse, excessively high levels of zinc/phos can actually "cause" DAMAGE your engine, rather than "prevent" it. Motor Oil Industry testing has found that motor oils with more than 1,400 ppm ZDDP, INCREASED long-term wear. And it was also found that motor oils with more than 2,000 ppm ZDDP started attacking the grain boundaries in the iron, resulting in camshaft spalling (pitting and flaking). The ZDDP value is simply the average of the zinc and the phosphorus values, then rounded down to the nearest 100 ppm (parts per million).
I tell them to forget all that high zinc nonsense and look at my Wear Protection Ranking List. And to select any high ranking oil there, no matter how much zinc it has, because zinc quantity simply does NOT matter. The only thing that matters regarding wear protection, is the psi value each oil can produce in my testing. The higher the psi value, the better the wear protection. I recommend they use the SAME highly ranked oil for break-in and after break-in. It's that simple."
From this guy..
https://540ratblog.wordpress.com/2013/06/20/motor-oil-wear-test-ranking/
This 540Rat blog testing has been debunked many times. While it has some potentially useful application to circle track racing engines utilizing flat tappet cams....it generally has little application to general wear in your passenger car or truck drive train. Rat's testing to determine "wear protection" utilizes questionable testing methods not utilized by auto manufacturers. And the Rat testing does nothing to determine ZDDP protection in the transition from a cold to warmed up engine....where most passenger car wear actually occurs.