I remember a heated discussion on this very forum with someone who according to his username consumed German Castrol. But the think he was most adamant about was that better wet traction came from tires that would shed water rather than absorb it. That kind of ran counter to the industry literature I found that said that holding onto water improved wet traction through the static properties of water (imagine a wet piece of piece sticking to the side of a cold glass).
I remember when I got some rather dramatic looking tires - the Dunlop SP Sport 9000 summer tires. They claimed that it had a carbon black ring down the center for better static dissipation. I tended to get shocked quite a bit, but didn't notice it was any better or worse. But the look was dramatic. Apparently still on the market in some form, although I'd think after two decades the rubber compound would have been improved.
So is there any better understanding about how all this works? I certainly get that tread design makes a huge difference. But do you want water to stick to the tire or not?
I remember when I got some rather dramatic looking tires - the Dunlop SP Sport 9000 summer tires. They claimed that it had a carbon black ring down the center for better static dissipation. I tended to get shocked quite a bit, but didn't notice it was any better or worse. But the look was dramatic. Apparently still on the market in some form, although I'd think after two decades the rubber compound would have been improved.
So is there any better understanding about how all this works? I certainly get that tread design makes a huge difference. But do you want water to stick to the tire or not?