I have a 2003 Ford E-250 w/ a Dana-60 rear end (3.73s, Traction-Lok limited slip).
The manual calls for dino SAE 90. I ran it for 500 miles before I changed to Redline 80W-140. THe Redline's cold temp viscosity is slightly higher than the dino SAE 90's, but the high temp viscosity for the Redline is thicker.
Would I be damaging anything by using this oil? My reasoning to use this was Ford specifies 75W-140 synthetic for its E-150 vans w/ the lighter duty Ford/Visteon 8.8" rear end. I don't understand why I would use straight 90 dino in a heavier (much heavier) duty E-250.
The difference between the E-150 and 250 is like night and day, whereas the difference between the 350 and 250 is very noticeable albeit not as much as the 150 and 250 gap.
I was looking for more protection at the sacrifice of drivetrain efficiency, should I switch to 75W-90 synthetic for the E-250?
The manual calls for dino SAE 90. I ran it for 500 miles before I changed to Redline 80W-140. THe Redline's cold temp viscosity is slightly higher than the dino SAE 90's, but the high temp viscosity for the Redline is thicker.
Would I be damaging anything by using this oil? My reasoning to use this was Ford specifies 75W-140 synthetic for its E-150 vans w/ the lighter duty Ford/Visteon 8.8" rear end. I don't understand why I would use straight 90 dino in a heavier (much heavier) duty E-250.
The difference between the E-150 and 250 is like night and day, whereas the difference between the 350 and 250 is very noticeable albeit not as much as the 150 and 250 gap.
I was looking for more protection at the sacrifice of drivetrain efficiency, should I switch to 75W-90 synthetic for the E-250?