The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down

Status
Not open for further replies.
To keep it simple regarding the Castrol-Mobil lawsuit, this is what I tell myself:
The word "synthetic" changed from a content-based descriptor to a performance-based descriptor. Strangely, content is not the only predictor of performance. In other words, 1+1 does not always equal 2. Blended properly, 1+1 can equal 3. Because, lubricant engineers have developed synthetic blend-based (Gp III/conventional blend) oils that perform nearly as well as true synthetic-based (PAO/ester) oils, at a much lower price point. And as we all know, the general public is very much concerned with product prices.
So now, marketing specialists can say their oil is "full synthetic" because the oil is significantly different (chemically) from conventional oil, and it performs very similar to a true synthetic.
I don't know if that is simple, but it's how I managed to wrap my head around this giant cr@p storm.
 
Exactly! LiquiMoly does differentiate between synthetic & Synthetic-Technolgy. There are many case where synthetic-technology works better than synthetic.

Lubrication has come a long way from when I 1st started using synthetic oils in the 70s
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top