For myself, I still believe metallic additives are a good thing, and so more of them 'tends to be better'.
I also think if an oil is low on them, the formulator is 'cheapening' the oil.
So here, I think it is a 'strong oil' because it have lots of detergents - 1400ppm Mg AND 900ppm Ca, which give it a TBN of 10, which is stronger than the 7-9 we see out of many oils.
As well as a good detergent package, it has BOTH moly and boron for anti-wear, not just one or the other. So it should be a 'smooth running' oil that keeps wear low.
That is why I would say its a 'strong oil'.
JMO.
I also think if an oil is low on them, the formulator is 'cheapening' the oil.
So here, I think it is a 'strong oil' because it have lots of detergents - 1400ppm Mg AND 900ppm Ca, which give it a TBN of 10, which is stronger than the 7-9 we see out of many oils.
As well as a good detergent package, it has BOTH moly and boron for anti-wear, not just one or the other. So it should be a 'smooth running' oil that keeps wear low.
That is why I would say its a 'strong oil'.
JMO.