Recent Topics
Kendall nitro 70
by Bullwinkle007. 01/19/19 11:11 PM
Dexron HP
by Snagglefoot. 01/19/19 11:11 PM
Ruger American 22 Mag
by TiredTrucker. 01/19/19 11:06 PM
Prestone Dex Cool vs Carquest Dexcool
by A_User55555. 01/19/19 11:05 PM
FRAM end cap differences EG and TG vs XG
by wemay. 01/19/19 09:25 PM
Valvoline modern Engine
by Pinoak. 01/19/19 09:02 PM
30 Vintage Photos
by StevieC. 01/19/19 08:23 PM
Low mileage, when to change oil?
by Metfanant. 01/19/19 08:05 PM
Filter with bypass when OEM has built-in bypass
by rubberchicken. 01/19/19 07:43 PM
Barrett Jackson 2019 Pics
by Nick1994. 01/19/19 05:41 PM
What do y'all do with old car parts?
by qdeezie. 01/19/19 05:11 PM
Diagnosing catalytic converters.
by Tlhfirelion. 01/19/19 04:20 PM
Oil recommendations for GM Vortec 8100
by Dudemanmaximus. 01/19/19 04:14 PM
Leaf Spring Questions- Lots of Questions
by George7941. 01/19/19 04:02 PM
Am I being out of line?
by Chris142. 01/19/19 04:00 PM
Some good modern rock songs
by 53' Stude. 01/19/19 03:51 PM
06 Pathfinder O2 sensor voltage sensor 1
by Bluestream. 01/19/19 03:50 PM
Honda Blue Coolants
by redhat. 01/19/19 03:49 PM
Newest Members
dougway, Jetsfan421, Fordman420, 72sbc, ejmiller
66982 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
56 registered members (A_User55555, bbhero, 53' Stude, ammolab, AnthemBassMan, 3 invisible), 1,203 guests, and 36 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics296,863
Posts4,960,348
Members66,982
Most Online2,688
Jan 19th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: MolaKule] #4975526
01/10/19 07:50 PM
01/10/19 07:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Nyogtha Offline
Nyogtha  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by MolaKule
When I first studied this non-legal issue and its outcome many years ago I said to myself, "If I wanted to bring a technical (chemistry) issue against a competitor, what's the Dumbest and most Stupidest thing I could do?? I would go to a NON-TECHNICAL business association to have the issue settled." eek

Sure, it involved some "Slippery Slope Advertising and Marketing," BUT in the main circus arena would be the question of whether or not a certain Group of base oil could be defined as, 'Synthetic.'

Now in reality I would first have a sit-down meeting with that competitor and discuss the issue, with my attorney's and chemists in tow. Most likely the competitor would say, "Bug off!," which I would have anticipated.

SOOOO, my next step would be to ask The American Chemistry Council to convene a special committee to hear the technical issues involved and then have that committee report out to the full board and its membership, with the ACC ultimately issuing a finding and a public statement. cool

HOWEVER, if I knew the most likely outcome of a business group ruling would ultimately benefit my company, because I knew that that Group of base oils could substitute for my low supply of expensive PAO's, what better way to slowly introduce my Group III's into my formulations without the outside world taking notice?? ???

Except for BITOG of course!


I don't think XOM ever "stategically planned for" or "engineered for" several strong hurricanes making landfall in the Gulf Coast striking their primary PAO production facilities in order to use Visom in Mobil 1 products, unless you're truly a believer XOM is controlled by a mystical cabal with powers beyond mortal humans I suppose.

Last edited by Nyogtha; 01/10/19 07:51 PM.

"No matter how paranoid you are you're not paranoid enough. Tell the truth. Reach as many people as you can with it. That's your weapon." - Susanne Modeski, aka "Holly" to The Lone Gunmen
Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Garak] #4977060
01/12/19 01:27 PM
01/12/19 01:27 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,616
Iowegia - USA
MolaKule Offline
MolaKule  Offline
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,616
Iowegia - USA
Originally Posted by Garak
Originally Posted by aquariuscsm
What's so ironic is how Mobil as said in their technical paper "Switched from pao base stocks to Visom group 3 base stocks without the consumers' knowledge". Pot meet kettle. I wonder if that paper is still online somewhere?

You can be rest assured that Mobil (and most others) realized they'd be winners irrespective of the way things worked out in the wash. After all, if Castrol can sell Group III as synthetic, so can everyone else.



Yes, and that was my main "non-mystical" LOL point. Either way EXMOB would benefit.

But doesn't it seem bizarre that a company, and this was my other point, with a large staff of chemical PhD's, would bring a highly technical issue to a business organization for a decision unless they knew that ultimately it would benefit them as well; hurricane or no hurricane?


Last edited by MolaKule; 01/12/19 01:35 PM.

Scars remind us of where we have been, but do not have to dictate where we are going.
Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Shannow] #4977283
01/12/19 06:03 PM
01/12/19 06:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Nyogtha Offline
Nyogtha  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
XOM's corporate culture prides itself on it's legal team above all other sectors of the business, a hallmark of the Exxon side pre-merger corporate culture. Mobil's corporate culture was overwritten after the merger (buyout) as is typical of the mergee (purchasee) in such transactions. One example: when I worked for Marathon assigned to issues of USEPA re-interpreting 1990's CAA provisions in 2000-2003, a consirtium of industry players with FCCU's formed a "battered CAA Consent Decree" roundtable group with USEPA participation; XOM steadfastly refused to even discuss these re-interpretations with a "we'll see y'all in court" response until the very end. I can understand how this may seem unusual to those not directy participating in the private sector for a large scale company if I step back for a more objective perspective.

For those of us who lived and worked at similar facilities affected by hurricanes Katrina & Rita and throughout the aftermath, these events were not simply experiences to be dismissed via conspiracy theories, and in fact are clearly mentioned in a bullet point of the XOM slideshow presentation.

These unpredictable sources of disruption to supply of the PAO market for unpredictable durations are what I *think* supplied the catalyst as it was for XOM to start using VISOM in M1, no matter what slowly plodding internal studies on PAO vs Gp III (+?) may have previoudly been predicting to be outcomes including gaining internal experience for XOM lubricamts organization in using base stocks with similar performance properties as GTL base stocks as mentioned in the slide show, on an industrial instead of pilot or demonstration facility scale. I think reading between the lines, XOM found the internal cost of keeping M1 free of Gp III (+?) stocks in such a sudden sudden unpredictable event for such an extended period without foresight to predict such a disruption and stockpile in anyicipation to be unpalatable, as well as the alternate solution to let such M1 products absorb the market impact of such disruption by passing along those costs in terms of longer term effect on market share.

Last edited by Nyogtha; 01/12/19 06:20 PM.

"No matter how paranoid you are you're not paranoid enough. Tell the truth. Reach as many people as you can with it. That's your weapon." - Susanne Modeski, aka "Holly" to The Lone Gunmen
Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Shannow] #4977363
01/12/19 07:35 PM
01/12/19 07:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Nyogtha Offline
Nyogtha  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Hurricane Ike in 2008 probably strongly reinforced this.


"No matter how paranoid you are you're not paranoid enough. Tell the truth. Reach as many people as you can with it. That's your weapon." - Susanne Modeski, aka "Holly" to The Lone Gunmen
Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Shannow] #4977599
01/13/19 12:36 AM
01/13/19 12:36 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Nyogtha Offline
Nyogtha  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
And the ability to source a variety of base stock supplies for M1 was undoubtably beneficial after Hurricane Harvey in 2017


"No matter how paranoid you are you're not paranoid enough. Tell the truth. Reach as many people as you can with it. That's your weapon." - Susanne Modeski, aka "Holly" to The Lone Gunmen
Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Shannow] #4977963
01/13/19 12:30 PM
01/13/19 12:30 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,616
Iowegia - USA
MolaKule Offline
MolaKule  Offline
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 19,616
Iowegia - USA
Nyo, you haven't addressed the question, nor have you proposed an alternative Hypothesis as to why a very large and visible energy company would take a very technical topic of this kind to a Business organization, rather than taking it to an organization which would have members with expertise in the subject matter.

And possibly, there is no real answer, because we (you nor me) cannot know what went on inside EXMOB at this time in history.


Scars remind us of where we have been, but do not have to dictate where we are going.
Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Shannow] #4978141
01/13/19 04:57 PM
01/13/19 04:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Nyogtha Offline
Nyogtha  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
I disagree with significant experience working for such organizations and find your hypotheseis condition of "hurricane or no hurricane" is invalid to begin with.

To posit such a large organizatiom to have PhD's at the forefront of the business mentality is likewise unrealistic as XOM deliberately conjuring hurricanes. PhD's are business resources in such organizations but not the ones steering business strategy. So if the finished product met the desired specs, and is formulated in accordance with industry rules, what business is it if anyone what the exact blend contains since that is a business confidential trade secret to begin with, as discussed, not visible on product labels outside one specific portion of the product market segment? So why convene an assembly of competitor representatives to advertise something there is zero business driver to advertise?

Everyone not directly involved in the events can never know *precisely* how events unfolded and it's near-miraculous that XOM slideshow presentation ever got leaked considering how attorney-proud the Exxon corporate culture has always been. However if they had pursued action publicly, it probably would have attracted much more attention than XOM desired from the motoring public.

This doesn't change the fact that while possibilities are endless, probabilities are finite bounded by 0 and 1, and that with large organizations, much like individuals, the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior (and vice-versa).

Last edited by Nyogtha; 01/13/19 05:14 PM.

"No matter how paranoid you are you're not paranoid enough. Tell the truth. Reach as many people as you can with it. That's your weapon." - Susanne Modeski, aka "Holly" to The Lone Gunmen
Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Shannow] #4978865
01/14/19 11:11 AM
01/14/19 11:11 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,165
Virginia
Tom NJ Offline
Tom NJ  Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,165
Virginia
I think XOM was smart to quietly bring the issue to an advertising board rather than a court of law, which would have attracted tons of mainstream media attention. If they won the NAD ruling they would have accomplished the same thing as in a court, i.e. Group III base oils cannot be labeled "synthetic". It wouldn't have the force of law, but the industry would adhere to it. If they lost (as they did), the news stays buried within the industry and the door remains open for them to join the Group III crowd at a later date (which they did). Yes the judging panel were not technical, but then judges rarely are, and many technical experts from the industry were called to testify for both sides.

I'm sure they realized that their later change to Group III would eventually be noticed by a small group of oil-heads (no offense BITOG) who would analyze data, samples, and MSDSs, and the news would circulate around specialty Internet forums. But they also knew that these enthusiasts are a very small number - the entire BITOG membership is only around 0.03% of the adult population in the USA, and most of them are not even active. I also think they handled the Internet uprising smartly, i.e., shut-up, repeat their mantra of "high quality synthetic base oils", and don't say anything publicly that could attract the media - just let the whole mess quietly blow over. I doubt they lost any significant business over this issue.

I should also point out that the NAD did not declare all Group IIIs to be synthetic as many believe. They simply said that Castrol's specific claims for their Group III+ based Syntec oils were acceptable, except for the part about "Unique Molecular Bonding" since they took the POE out of the new formulas. The rest of the industry jumped on this ruling and began marketing all Group IIIs as "synthetic", figuring that no one would challenge them after the NAD ruling and they can enjoy the higher margins from the synthetic market.

We as consumers benefited from this whole deal. With the higher demand for Group III stocks came higher production and wider availability. This allowed the engine manufacturers to ratchet up specifications for motor oils, and the increased competition brought synthetic prices way down (Group IIIs vs PAO/ester). Now we all get many more oil options at different price points in selecting what we feel we need or want for our cars, rather than just the old mineral or PAO/ester. And if we want PAO/ester based oils and are willing to pay for them, they are still available. Overall higher quality oils with more options and price points is a win-win for all.

Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Tom NJ] #4978893
01/14/19 11:32 AM
01/14/19 11:32 AM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,860
Texas
4WD Offline
4WD  Offline
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,860
Texas
Agree … worked out Ok for the consumer and OEM … and as pointed out often … many motor oils are built from various base stocks depending on target performance …

Re: The Castrol/Mobil "court case" - how it went down [Re: Shannow] #4979293
01/14/19 06:17 PM
01/14/19 06:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Nyogtha Offline
Nyogtha  Offline
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,719
San Antonio, TX
Thanks for the industry professional perspective & insight Tom!


"No matter how paranoid you are you're not paranoid enough. Tell the truth. Reach as many people as you can with it. That's your weapon." - Susanne Modeski, aka "Holly" to The Lone Gunmen
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™