Recent Topics
Barrett Jackson 2019 Pics
by Nick1994. 01/19/19 05:41 PM
What do y'all do with old car parts?
by qdeezie. 01/19/19 05:11 PM
Diagnosing catalytic converters.
by Tlhfirelion. 01/19/19 04:20 PM
Oil recommendations for GM Vortec 8100
by Dudemanmaximus. 01/19/19 04:14 PM
Leaf Spring Questions- Lots of Questions
by George7941. 01/19/19 04:02 PM
Am I being out of line?
by Chris142. 01/19/19 04:00 PM
Some good modern rock songs
by 53' Stude. 01/19/19 03:51 PM
06 Pathfinder O2 sensor voltage sensor 1
by Bluestream. 01/19/19 03:50 PM
Honda Blue Coolants
by redhat. 01/19/19 03:49 PM
Let's talk about some of the other NHL teams
by 53' Stude. 01/19/19 03:45 PM
coolants for 1965 imperial
by ted s. 01/19/19 03:35 PM
Where to get real Dexron III ?
by das_peikko. 01/19/19 02:40 PM
Dexcool + Prestone AMAM Mix
by George7941. 01/19/19 02:31 PM
Questions about Maverik gas
by MRtv. 01/19/19 01:25 PM
Anyone Taking Superfoods ?
by Warstud. 01/19/19 12:55 PM
Permatex High Tack (80062)
by TheLawnRanger. 01/19/19 12:29 PM
A little warm down in Oz.
by Snagglefoot. 01/19/19 12:03 PM
Supertech 6607 - 7300 miles - 2017 Legacy
by MrWideTires. 01/19/19 10:21 AM
Newest Members
ejmiller, _THOR_, Captmorgan2112, TreadMonster, Snachlift500
66978 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
92 registered members (4WD, 28oz, anndel, 69Torino, A310, 11 invisible), 1,973 guests, and 34 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics296,850
Posts4,960,145
Members66,978
Most Online2,688
Jan 19th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking #4962677
12/27/18 03:00 PM
12/27/18 03:00 PM
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 550
Northeastern Vermont
littleant Offline OP
littleant  Offline OP
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 550
Northeastern Vermont
New 2019-ford-ranger not a bad looking truck. 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque.

https://www.autotrader.com/car-video/video-2019-ford-ranger-has-finally-arrived-281474979903173


I can't prevent getting old but I REFUSE to grow up.
2010 Mountaineer 4.0
2002 Jeep Wrangler TJ 4.0
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962690
12/27/18 03:32 PM
12/27/18 03:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,098
Middlesex County CT
simple_gifts Offline
simple_gifts  Offline
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,098
Middlesex County CT
Interesting; This is Ford's "New Beetle"; A reintroduced vehicle with all of the simplicity and desirability of the original design engineered away....

Last edited by simple_gifts; 12/27/18 03:32 PM.

2004 Prius; 102K; ASL
2007 Yaris 78K 0w-40 Castrol
2006 B2300;132K;ALM


Was driving an ox cart; Now on the USS Enterprise
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962706
12/27/18 03:48 PM
12/27/18 03:48 PM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 97
Missouri
Oily_Thing Offline
Oily_Thing  Offline
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 97
Missouri
Expensive little thing...


2013 Cadillac XTS4 3.6
2015 Dodge Durango Limited 3.6
2011 Kawasaki Vulcan Voyager 1700
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962710
12/27/18 03:55 PM
12/27/18 03:55 PM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 154
California
Dave1027 Online content
Dave1027  Online Content
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 154
California
Looks like it only has one engine option, a turbo 4 cyl.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: simple_gifts] #4962711
12/27/18 03:55 PM
12/27/18 03:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,414
Northern Ontario, Canada
Danno Offline
Danno  Offline
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,414
Northern Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by simple_gifts
Interesting; This is Ford's "New Beetle"; A reintroduced vehicle with all of the simplicity and desirability of the original design engineered away....

No such thing as simple in today's vehicles.


2016 Sorento SX V6 AWD
2015 KIA RIO SX
2010 Mazda 3 2.0L
2009 Venza V6 AWD
2013 Sonata 2.4L RIP in write-off crash
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962759
12/27/18 05:03 PM
12/27/18 05:03 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,534
Flaherty, KY
92saturnsl2 Offline
92saturnsl2  Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,534
Flaherty, KY
They took the appeal of the original ranger out-- Apart from the engine which seems pretty appropriate for the application, there's not many reasons to like it. No manual trans and hideously expensive.

The author of the article made a great point-- we're getting a "new" truck in North America that was released a few years ago in other markets, so it's a bit like buying stale bread.


1985 F-250HD 7.5L 4x4 135k- Castrol GTX 15w-40 HDEO
04 Odyssey EX 184k Valv. Durablend 5w-30
96 Maxima GLE 255k Castrol Edge EP 5w-20
07 Chrysler Pacifica Limited 4.0L 134k Chevron Supreme 5w-20
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962761
12/27/18 05:05 PM
12/27/18 05:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,131
The Midwest
skyactiv Offline
skyactiv  Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,131
The Midwest
I've been wanting one and am willing to accept the potential bugs and issues. I had a custom home built on 5 acres and need a truck.


Wife: 15' Audi A4 quattro 6 speed manual
Me: 13' VW GTI 3 door 6 speed manual
Wanted: 2019 Ford Ranger
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962763
12/27/18 05:06 PM
12/27/18 05:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,900
New Braunfels
Bryanccfshr Offline
Bryanccfshr  Offline
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,900
New Braunfels
Decent looking appliance.


2018 Trd Pro 4Runner
2018 Tacoma off-road

Dealer 0w20 to M1 0w40 FS -it depends
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962765
12/27/18 05:12 PM
12/27/18 05:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 98
VA
thastinger Offline
thastinger  Offline
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 98
VA
Looks like an Escape and F150 got together and had that as a baby. As the owner of 3 Fords...that Fin thing is ugly.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962803
12/27/18 05:58 PM
12/27/18 05:58 PM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,677
Tri State Conservative
Zee09 Offline
Zee09  Offline
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,677
Tri State Conservative
This guys scoring system makes no sense.


"If I walked on water, they'd say I couldn't swim."
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962814
12/27/18 06:13 PM
12/27/18 06:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,904
Marshfield , MA
andyd Offline
andyd  Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,904
Marshfield , MA
It should be called F 100 . Ranger was way smaller.


'16 Camry LE STP synth 0w20 and STP filter. the Fridge

1994 Ranger ,the Rat, 5w30 dino, STP filter

'16 Camry SE, Valvoline HM 0w20 and OEM filter
Thick oil is better grin2
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962844
12/27/18 06:48 PM
12/27/18 06:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,587
NY, USA, etc.
oilpsi2high Offline
oilpsi2high  Offline
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,587
NY, USA, etc.
How does this not have a leather-wrapped steering wheel?!

*edit* NVM, looks like that screenshot was from a different model.

Last edited by oilpsi2high; 12/27/18 06:49 PM.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962855
12/27/18 07:06 PM
12/27/18 07:06 PM
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,147
New England
madRiver Offline
madRiver  Offline
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,147
New England
Seems like a relevant profitable model for 2019.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962866
12/27/18 07:19 PM
12/27/18 07:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 6,983
...
PimTac Offline
PimTac  Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 6,983
...
They never stopped production of the Ranger overseas. I remember some commercials showing the Ranger fording a stream with water going over the hood.

It looked impressive but I suspect that EcoBoost engine will go Eco-Boom with the water going into the intake.

Last edited by PimTac; 12/27/18 07:19 PM.

Cannot see signatures any longer so it doesn’t matter.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962872
12/27/18 07:27 PM
12/27/18 07:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,249
Dallas,Tx USA
aquariuscsm Offline
aquariuscsm  Offline
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19,249
Dallas,Tx USA
Curious,what ended the mini truck craze?


1996 Nissan 300ZX 5-speed,Arctic Pearl(#175 of 300)
Quaker State Ultimate Durability 10W30
2012 Honda Accord Coupe EX-L 2.4,auto,San Marino Red
Pennzoil Platinum 5W20

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: aquariuscsm] #4962880
12/27/18 07:40 PM
12/27/18 07:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 140
northwest pa
justintendo Offline
justintendo  Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 140
northwest pa
lack of sales..
i do love a ranger for the simplicity and ease of maintenance..easy to find in a stick, etc..

but thats precisely why people dont want them.


2013 escape 2.0 awd mobil 1 10w30ep
2008 fusion 2.3 mtx redline 0w20
1996 f150 4.9 2wd mtx mobil 1 10w30hm
1999 kaw zrx 1100 redline 10w40
many husqvarnas
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962897
12/27/18 08:05 PM
12/27/18 08:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,786
Central Maryland
HangFire Offline
HangFire  Offline
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,786
Central Maryland
Lack of sales, due to a.) losing the meaning of mini-truck and b.) lack of meaningful refreshes.

You had the 4.0L V6 Ford Ranger getting mileage in the mid-teens.

You had the upsized Dakota with a V6 getting mileage in the mid-teens, looking very much like a Ram from a few years back in size.

They both totally lost the concept of an ECONOMICAL small pickup truck.

Meanwhile Toyota just kept selling Tacoma's....


Various musings: http://hangfire.net
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: Danno] #4962919
12/27/18 08:36 PM
12/27/18 08:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,917
Central Washington
Colt45ws Offline
Colt45ws  Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 9,917
Central Washington
Originally Posted by Danno
Originally Posted by simple_gifts
Interesting; This is Ford's "New Beetle"; A reintroduced vehicle with all of the simplicity and desirability of the original design engineered away....

No such thing as simple in today's vehicles.

Yeah. If you want simple, you're gonna have to go used. Today's buyers want all the features and that makes it hideously expensive. $40k!


-Colton
2002 Ford Crown Vic PI 207k, Ex-Kootenai County, ID Unit #42
Down for engine swap
2003 Ford Crown Vic PI 86k
Pennzoil Conv HM 5W30, Fram XG2
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: HangFire] #4962922
12/27/18 08:36 PM
12/27/18 08:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,587
NY, USA, etc.
oilpsi2high Offline
oilpsi2high  Offline
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,587
NY, USA, etc.
Originally Posted by HangFire
Lack of sales, due to a.) losing the meaning of mini-truck and b.) lack of meaningful refreshes.

You had the 4.0L V6 Ford Ranger getting mileage in the mid-teens.

You had the upsized Dakota with a V6 getting mileage in the mid-teens, looking very much like a Ram from a few years back in size.

They both totally lost the concept of an ECONOMICAL small pickup truck.

Meanwhile Toyota just kept selling Tacoma's....


Tacomas also get mileage in the teens.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: aquariuscsm] #4962924
12/27/18 08:37 PM
12/27/18 08:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,587
NY, USA, etc.
oilpsi2high Offline
oilpsi2high  Offline
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,587
NY, USA, etc.
Originally Posted by aquariuscsm
Curious,what ended the mini truck craze?


$ 4 a gallon gas and rebates on full-size trucks making them the same price as the mid-sizers with much less capability.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962950
12/27/18 08:59 PM
12/27/18 08:59 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,098
Middlesex County CT
simple_gifts Offline
simple_gifts  Offline
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 12,098
Middlesex County CT
Ranger/B2300 2WD with Duratec was rated @ 29MPG with the 5sp MT; I got 31 on a 1000 mile loop to my parents in Western VA.

I basically haul stuff occasionally with mine but it is practical to be considered a DD if pressed into service.


2004 Prius; 102K; ASL
2007 Yaris 78K 0w-40 Castrol
2006 B2300;132K;ALM


Was driving an ox cart; Now on the USS Enterprise
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: aquariuscsm] #4962969
12/27/18 09:21 PM
12/27/18 09:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 421
new jersey
hemitruck Offline
hemitruck  Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 421
new jersey
Originally Posted by aquariuscsm
Curious,what ended the mini truck craze?


For the same or sometimes less dollars , you could get a full size truck.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4962975
12/27/18 09:28 PM
12/27/18 09:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 6,983
...
PimTac Offline
PimTac  Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 6,983
...
The trend is towards crew cabs/double cabs. Many customers that want a pickup also need it to pick up the kids or whatever.


Cannot see signatures any longer so it doesn’t matter.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: hemitruck] #4962979
12/27/18 09:31 PM
12/27/18 09:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,857
Texas
4WD Online confused
4WD  Online Confused
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,857
Texas
It is important that they maintain a few MPG in between these and full size … and full sized is mainly an American thing with us often having lower fuel prices and a bit more room to park in many places.
If this is a solid 10 year+ truck … it will see higher fuel prices a couple times or so …

I for one no longer want or need a 4 door full size …don’t enjoy driving them …

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4963125
12/28/18 05:01 AM
12/28/18 05:01 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 19,584
PNW
ZeeOSix Offline
ZeeOSix  Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 19,584
PNW

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4963270
12/28/18 09:09 AM
12/28/18 09:09 AM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 856
Mississippi
TheLawnRanger Offline
TheLawnRanger  Offline
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 856
Mississippi
Forvy Rangerado


'99 Cavalier 5w 30 SuperTech conventional
'11 Impala 5w 30 Magnatec full synthetic
'12 Colorado 5w 30 Magnatec full synthetic
*regular Wix oil filters for all
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4963347
12/28/18 11:15 AM
12/28/18 11:15 AM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 552
Hither & Yon
Hounds Offline
Hounds  Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 552
Hither & Yon
I think the Ranger will sell well. Particularly to many who don't "need" a truck in the first place. And, in this regard, it seems as if Ford's marketing guys have anticipated this, because those being delivered initially are mostly XLTs and Lariats with most of the options available. This results in truckloads of $45k+ Rangers -- a far cry from the basic $25k truck with the same running gear.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4963939
12/28/18 10:18 PM
12/28/18 10:18 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 19,584
PNW
ZeeOSix Offline
ZeeOSix  Offline
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 19,584
PNW
The turboed 4-cylinder is probably the same basic engine used in the Mustang.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4963974
12/28/18 11:30 PM
12/28/18 11:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,960
New Zealand
Silk Offline
Silk  Offline
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,960
New Zealand
It's a ute not a truck, and if you don't get the 5 cyl diesel why bother.


1987 BMW R65 - Aegis SAE30
2005 Nissan Expert - Gulf Western 10W-40
1996 Volvo T5 - Penrite HPR15 - 15W-60. Ryco syntec filter.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4964588
12/29/18 05:17 PM
12/29/18 05:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 41,951
'Stralia
Shannow Online content
Shannow  Online Content
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 41,951
'Stralia


The Dunning Kruger effect is real.
The Galileo Fallacy is real.
Roll them into one neat package and crackmeup crackmeup crackmeup
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4964635
12/29/18 06:40 PM
12/29/18 06:40 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,448
Tasmania, Australia
hpb Offline
hpb  Offline
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,448
Tasmania, Australia
Good review. I do wish they'd given the Raptor some more grunt though! I think putting the 10 speed auto behind the 3.2 diesel would've done the trick.

The 4 cylinder petrol engine they're getting in the US seems decent, wonder if it will make it to Oz?


MY16 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.2 diesel, 57,000km - Castrol 5w30
2006 Ford Falcon 4.0, 140,000km - Valvoline Engine Armour 15w40, Ryco filter
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4964640
12/29/18 06:42 PM
12/29/18 06:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 439
Omaha, NE USA
fisher83 Offline
fisher83  Offline
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 439
Omaha, NE USA
I like it and I think it will sell well. I’ve both Chevy and Dodge half tons, a Nissan Hardbody, and 3 Rangers, and currently a Frontier. I like the midsize crew cab setup the best. While it doesn’t have the capability of current 1/2 tons it has more than enough capability for what I need to do, room for the kids, and it fits in the garage. All I tow is a little fishing boat and a 21’ camper and it handles those very well. A basic, low option Ranger was great for me years ago but what I have now is much more usable for the family. I think Ford is doing the right thing not making this bare bones. They have to make something to be competitive and I think they have done just that.


2015 Toyota RAV4 Limited 41k
2016 Nissan Frontier Pro-4x 18k
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: hpb] #4964684
12/29/18 07:52 PM
12/29/18 07:52 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,960
New Zealand
Silk Offline
Silk  Offline
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,960
New Zealand
Originally Posted by hpb
The 4 cylinder petrol engine they're getting in the US seems decent, wonder if it will make it to Oz?


There is talk about it being an option here...the turbo will give it some torque lower in the rev range, but it won't be anywhere near a diesel. Maybe for those who just use them as a car, the 4 cyl petrol might be better.


1987 BMW R65 - Aegis SAE30
2005 Nissan Expert - Gulf Western 10W-40
1996 Volvo T5 - Penrite HPR15 - 15W-60. Ryco syntec filter.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: Silk] #4964895
12/29/18 11:41 PM
12/29/18 11:41 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,448
Tasmania, Australia
hpb Offline
hpb  Offline
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,448
Tasmania, Australia
Originally Posted by Silk
Maybe for those who just use them as a car, the 4 cyl petrol might be better.


I agree, and they'd do much better in a city environment than the diesel, not that I've experienced or heard of any DPF issues with the Rangers.


MY16 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.2 diesel, 57,000km - Castrol 5w30
2006 Ford Falcon 4.0, 140,000km - Valvoline Engine Armour 15w40, Ryco filter
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: Silk] #4965016
12/30/18 07:31 AM
12/30/18 07:31 AM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,383
South Central PA
Delta Offline
Delta  Offline
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,383
South Central PA
Originally Posted by Silk
It's a ute not a truck, and if you don't get the 5 cyl diesel why bother.


Sorry, but why would anybody want that engine? We had 2 Transit's with that engine at my old work and they were always in the shop* They also were not the best performer.



*Always emissions related that caused a power degrade situation. Other countries might not have those issues...


'17 VW GTI 2.0T - 6MT - 12K - PPE 5w40
'15 Camry SE - 2.5 - 21K - PP 0w20
'99 S10 - 2.2 5MT - 157K - PP 10w30
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4965296
12/30/18 12:58 PM
12/30/18 12:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 175
connecticut
CT Rob Offline
CT Rob  Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 175
connecticut
Way over priced just like all the trucks and cars today.


2017 Toyota Tundra SR5 Crewmax 4x4 Trd offroad.Inferno Orange.All stock for now....
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: Delta] #4965477
12/30/18 04:22 PM
12/30/18 04:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,960
New Zealand
Silk Offline
Silk  Offline
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,960
New Zealand
[quote=Delta
Sorry, but why would anybody want that engine? We had 2 Transit's with that engine at my old work and they were always in the shop* They also were not the best performer.
[/quote]

We don't seem to have many problems with them here...apart from the oil pump not working after an oil change, but we all heard about that one pretty quick. More a home oil change issue. The Ranger has been outselling the Toyota Hi Lux for some time now, despite Toyota dropping chunks off the price.


1987 BMW R65 - Aegis SAE30
2005 Nissan Expert - Gulf Western 10W-40
1996 Volvo T5 - Penrite HPR15 - 15W-60. Ryco syntec filter.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: Delta] #4965565
12/30/18 06:39 PM
12/30/18 06:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,448
Tasmania, Australia
hpb Offline
hpb  Offline
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,448
Tasmania, Australia
Originally Posted by Delta
Originally Posted by Silk
It's a ute not a truck, and if you don't get the 5 cyl diesel why bother.


Sorry, but why would anybody want that engine? We had 2 Transit's with that engine at my old work and they were always in the shop* They also were not the best performer.



*Always emissions related that caused a power degrade situation. Other countries might not have those issues...



Yeah, as Silk said, very few issues with the 5 cylinder diesel in the Rangers here. My company has hundreds of them in service all over Oz, and they've proven very reliable. The one I'm currently driving is at 170,000km and has had nothing but regular services every 15,000km. They're the best selling vehicle in Australia, there'd be a huge outcry if the engines were no good.

Current Rangers have EGR and DPF, what extra emission gear do US spec Transits have?


MY16 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.2 diesel, 57,000km - Castrol 5w30
2006 Ford Falcon 4.0, 140,000km - Valvoline Engine Armour 15w40, Ryco filter
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: hpb] #4965872
12/31/18 06:28 AM
12/31/18 06:28 AM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,383
South Central PA
Delta Offline
Delta  Offline
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,383
South Central PA
Originally Posted by hpb
Yeah, as Silk said, very few issues with the 5 cylinder diesel in the Rangers here. My company has hundreds of them in service all over Oz, and they've proven very reliable. The one I'm currently driving is at 170,000km and has had nothing but regular services every 15,000km. They're the best selling vehicle in Australia, there'd be a huge outcry if the engines were no good.

Current Rangers have EGR and DPF, what extra emission gear do US spec Transits have?


As far as I know they're the same setup. Come to think of it we had 3, a '15, '16, and '17, forgot about the new one. The '15 and '16 had metal shavings go throughout the system from the fuel pump, which both had new fuel systems replaced under warranty. But after that they were never the same and would go through sensors, a DEF tank heater, and some other nick-knack issues. Would always be real interesting to have the engine go in degrade issues driving through the mountains... The '17 hadn't had issues yet before I left.


'17 VW GTI 2.0T - 6MT - 12K - PPE 5w40
'15 Camry SE - 2.5 - 21K - PP 0w20
'99 S10 - 2.2 5MT - 157K - PP 10w30
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: Delta] #4966342
12/31/18 05:11 PM
12/31/18 05:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,448
Tasmania, Australia
hpb Offline
hpb  Offline
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,448
Tasmania, Australia
Interesting. Wonder if where they're built could be a factor? Our Rangers come from Thailand, and the general fit and finish is excellent.


MY16 Mitsubishi Outlander 2.2 diesel, 57,000km - Castrol 5w30
2006 Ford Falcon 4.0, 140,000km - Valvoline Engine Armour 15w40, Ryco filter
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4966367
12/31/18 05:48 PM
12/31/18 05:48 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,782
Indiana
dlundblad Offline
dlundblad  Offline
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,782
Indiana
Not bad looking, but too [censored] big!

I saw one up in Michigan back in September. I think they look better in person.. Very Honda Ridgeline like depending on the angle of the camera.


03 Jeep WJ 4.0 202k Edge 10w40 HM Fram XG16
02 Volvo S60 2.4T 186k M1 0w40 Mahle OX149D
97 Chevy Blazer 4.3 153k Synpower 5w30 Supertech ST3980 (Ecore)

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: aquariuscsm] #4969445
01/04/19 06:45 AM
01/04/19 06:45 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 178
Lake County, Ohio
ls973800 Offline
ls973800  Offline
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 178
Lake County, Ohio
Just saw this article that says the left front tire has to be removed in order to change oil on the new Ranger along with removing 9 push pins to remove a cover and four other bolts for a module cover. That's for the filter and oil change.

Remove wheel to replace oil filter

Last edited by ls973800; 01/04/19 06:46 AM.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: ls973800] #4969457
01/04/19 07:08 AM
01/04/19 07:08 AM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 552
Hither & Yon
Hounds Offline
Hounds  Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 552
Hither & Yon
Originally Posted by ls973800
Just saw this article that says the left front tire has to be removed in order to change oil on the new Ranger along with removing 9 push pins to remove a cover and four other bolts for a module cover. That's for the filter and oil change.

Remove wheel to replace oil filter

Yes, the things that may be required -- emphasis on "may be required -- to change the oil & filter has become quite an issue for some.

FWIW, as noted on the other thread, removing the front tire isn't required; it simply ensures greater access to the oil filter via the fender well. Also, the "module cover" in question is actually a metal shield that protects the oil pan. The fact that the shield exists isn't surprising on a truck. What is surprising is the number of Saturday morning "mechanics" who find removing four bolts to gain access to the sump plug a somewhat daunting task.

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: Oily_Thing] #4969587
01/04/19 10:20 AM
01/04/19 10:20 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,218
Maricopa, Arizona
dave1251 Online happy
dave1251  Online Happy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,218
Maricopa, Arizona
Originally Posted by Oily_Thing
Expensive little thing...



You have not been new truck shopping.


make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: andyd] #4969588
01/04/19 10:22 AM
01/04/19 10:22 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,218
Maricopa, Arizona
dave1251 Online happy
dave1251  Online Happy
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,218
Maricopa, Arizona
Originally Posted by andyd
It should be called F 100 . Ranger was way smaller.



You have not driven new trucks this thing is compact by today's standards.


make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4970343
01/05/19 08:58 AM
01/05/19 08:58 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,877
NH
supton Offline
supton  Offline
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,877
NH
Seems stupid but I tend to be a fan of tire rotations every 5k, and, with all my FUD and whatnot, I'd rather do 5k OCI's. Pulling a wheel IS stupid to do an oil change but so is pulling an intake manifold to do plugs, or pulling engine mount to do a timing belt, and a bunch of other things. In reality, if it's only every few years... or "only" pulling a wheel... then it's a first world problem.


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 176k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 145k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 199k, his
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4970561
01/05/19 01:51 PM
01/05/19 01:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,571
DELAWARE
Hootbro Offline
Hootbro  Offline
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,571
DELAWARE
I think some here are stuck in the glory days of a regular cab manual 2WD Ranger that the real world North American market has shifted away from.

That being said, everything I have seen and read of this new Ranger shows it to be priced pretty right and competitive with the GM and Toyota models it competes against. Ford's decision for just one engine option and powerful one at that, is a good choice.

The various TFL Youtube channels have had some good videos on the new Ranger and comparisons against the Tacoma and the F150. Model for model against the F150 with similar options, the Ranger is tracking $10K-$12K less than the F150 in cost. If I was back in the mid to smaller truck market, I would give the new Ranger serious consideration.


2019 Toyota Tacoma 3.5L (Factory Fill 0W-20)
2017 Jeep Renegade 2.4L (Idemitsu 0W-20)

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4970642
01/05/19 03:19 PM
01/05/19 03:19 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,878
Fort Lauderdale, FL
DoubleWasp Offline
DoubleWasp  Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,878
Fort Lauderdale, FL
No redeeming qualities other than being sort of smaller than full size. Yeah, no thanks.

Previous Ranger even in XLT with 4x4 was priced around the cost of an economy car. This thing is $40k+ with a gas 4-cylinder and 2WD? Wow. They can keep it.


07 Lincoln Navigator M1 0w-40/FU
68 Charger R/T / Supercharged 440 VR1/DBL7349
07 Ram 3500 4x4 / Cummins 6.7 /DBL7349
17 Maserati GranTurismo Cabrio
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: DoubleWasp] #4970675
01/05/19 03:49 PM
01/05/19 03:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 175
connecticut
CT Rob Offline
CT Rob  Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 175
connecticut
Originally Posted by DoubleWasp
No redeeming qualities other than being sort of smaller than full size. Yeah, no thanks.

Previous Ranger even in XLT with 4x4 was priced around the cost of an economy car. This thing is $40k+ with a gas 4-cylinder and 2WD? Wow. They can keep it.

Exactly.so out of control


2017 Toyota Tundra SR5 Crewmax 4x4 Trd offroad.Inferno Orange.All stock for now....
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4971333
01/06/19 11:52 AM
01/06/19 11:52 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,384
Phoenix, AZ
panthermike Offline
panthermike  Offline
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,384
Phoenix, AZ
I love the looks of it actually. My brother had that same power train combo in his mustang and it is a blast to drive. My issue really with all midsize pickups is the price just doesn't make it worth it to me


'15 Lexus RX350; PP 0w20/LG, 42K
'10 F150 5.4; PPHM 5w30/LG, 98K
'70 F100; Valvoline 15w40/LG

Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4972078
01/07/19 08:38 AM
01/07/19 08:38 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,729
Southeast
meep Offline
meep  Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,729
Southeast
I think it's a great offering. If we didn't pull a camper I'd give it strong consideration - hard to part with a fullsize bed though.


2018 F150
2015 crv (wifey!)
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: meep] #4975698
01/11/19 12:18 AM
01/11/19 12:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 41,951
'Stralia
Shannow Online content
Shannow  Online Content
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 41,951
'Stralia
Originally Posted by meep
I think it's a great offering. If we didn't pull a camper I'd give it strong consideration - hard to part with a fullsize bed though.


Lots of Ozers pull campers...6000lb towing capacity.

There's a family SUV version of them as well, the Everest. A mate's got one and he drags race cars around with it all the time...

BTW, speaking of Everest, here's a pretty one I saw today with flared guards.




everest.jpg
Last edited by Shannow; 01/11/19 12:23 AM.

The Dunning Kruger effect is real.
The Galileo Fallacy is real.
Roll them into one neat package and crackmeup crackmeup crackmeup
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4975833
01/11/19 08:28 AM
01/11/19 08:28 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,729
Southeast
meep Offline
meep  Offline
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,729
Southeast
it's hard to fathom a 4-pot pulling 6,000 lbs but I'm totally rooting for it to prove itself. And from experience, for that kind of weight I absolutely want the wheelbase and track width of a full size. That said, I'd much rather commute in a smaller truck than a fullsize... until the weekend, when plywood, etc., has to find its way home regularly. Living with Ford's 2.7L, I think if anyone is poised to make this work with a 4-cyl they are, though we all know that the 3.5 and to a lesser degree the 2.7 have both had some teething pains. The 2.7 has such a wonderful torque curve that the 2.3 could be the next bar to be met.


2018 F150
2015 crv (wifey!)
Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: Hootbro] #4984241
01/19/19 09:35 AM
01/19/19 09:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 110
Whitecourt, Alberta
leeaspell Offline
leeaspell  Offline
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 110
Whitecourt, Alberta
Originally Posted by Hootbro
I think some here are stuck in the glory days of a regular cab manual 2WD Ranger that the real world North American market has shifted away from.

That being said, everything I have seen and read of this new Ranger shows it to be priced pretty right and competitive with the GM and Toyota models it competes against. Ford's decision for just one engine option and powerful one at that, is a good choice.

The various TFL Youtube channels have had some good videos on the new Ranger and comparisons against the Tacoma and the F150. Model for model against the F150 with similar options, the Ranger is tracking $10K-$12K less than the F150 in cost. If I was back in the mid to smaller truck market, I would give the new Ranger serious consideration.

Local dealership here just got a Lariat 4x4 in, sticker price is is $52K CAD


2015 F150 5.0L VWB 5w20, Napa gold
2013 Fusion 2.5L- vwb 5w20, Napa gold



Re: New 2019-ford-ranger not bad looking [Re: littleant] #4984442
01/19/19 12:56 PM
01/19/19 12:56 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,383
Central Virginia
Silverado12 Offline
Silverado12  Offline
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,383
Central Virginia
2019 Ranger 44K USD

We just got one in locally at our Ford dealer here. More expensive than a fullsize OTD.


12 Chevy Silverado ext. cab LS, 2WD 4.3 auto
18 Mustang GT 5.0 auto
07 Harley Dyna Street Bob 96 c.i. 6 sp.
00 Mustang GT auto
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™