I bought one for my 2000 Ford Crown Vic and decided to do some testing...
I recorded MAF readings during a off-idle to 5300 RPM (logged MAF vs RPM), then recorded air pressure and air temperature readings - all using the stock paper filter.
I then installed the Kool Blue and repeated the procedure.
I used MathCAD to graph the two results and what did I find?
I found a +70cfm increase in airflow around 3000-3500 RPM (near the peak torque/HP range) and +22 cfm at 5300 RPM.
I felt an improvement in throttle response, and a bit more hp... but I mainly got the filter for its reusability. My paper filters get clogged way too early in NJ (due to pollen, dust, dirt, etc...)
I bought one for my dad's E-150 (so we both got free T-shirts froM Summit Racing... hehe, you can't have too many t-shirts)
[ September 13, 2002, 10:24 PM: Message edited by: metroplex ]
I recorded MAF readings during a off-idle to 5300 RPM (logged MAF vs RPM), then recorded air pressure and air temperature readings - all using the stock paper filter.
I then installed the Kool Blue and repeated the procedure.
I used MathCAD to graph the two results and what did I find?
I found a +70cfm increase in airflow around 3000-3500 RPM (near the peak torque/HP range) and +22 cfm at 5300 RPM.
I felt an improvement in throttle response, and a bit more hp... but I mainly got the filter for its reusability. My paper filters get clogged way too early in NJ (due to pollen, dust, dirt, etc...)
I bought one for my dad's E-150 (so we both got free T-shirts froM Summit Racing... hehe, you can't have too many t-shirts)
[ September 13, 2002, 10:24 PM: Message edited by: metroplex ]