Recent Topics
AC compressor pulley replacement
by PhuongFU. 12/11/18 05:34 PM
Battery Woofed
by Tdbo. 12/11/18 05:32 PM
Amsoil TBN versus M1 / RP in ASTM D2896 Testing
by StevieC. 12/11/18 05:30 PM
Grade of Fuel for Snow Blower
by cb450sc. 12/11/18 04:36 PM
Heat Not Hot
by coopns. 12/11/18 04:30 PM
BMW or Volvo Transmission Rebuild
by kawan. 12/11/18 04:29 PM
Front brake pads
by Papa Bear. 12/11/18 03:38 PM
Another too much oil in the sump thread
by paulri. 12/11/18 03:15 PM
Honda and 2 different Frams
by mclasser. 12/11/18 02:19 PM
Fluctuating Tachometer
by jerseyguy123. 12/11/18 02:09 PM
Light weight non stick 11" fry pan suggestion
by PandaBear. 12/11/18 02:07 PM
Four 333d oil filters
by Burt. 12/11/18 01:51 PM
Exploding water heater
by Alfred_B. 12/11/18 01:16 PM
Donaldson P550335 - good for 10k or 1 year?
by leoblack9. 12/11/18 12:41 PM
Redline D4 or Honda atf
by Bullwinkle007. 12/11/18 12:28 PM
Gas dryer heat wont stay on more than 5 mins
by Brybo86. 12/11/18 11:58 AM
fuel additive for gas vehicles
by ugabulldog. 12/11/18 10:47 AM
Newest Members
tcoffin014, Schm1d, EagleC, Dinka, MechanicGuy
66654 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
117 registered members (55hambone, 69Torino, 240_Ed, 2oldtommy, 2004tdigls, 13 invisible), 1,956 guests, and 38 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics294,929
Posts4,924,475
Members66,654
Most Online2,553
Oct 27th, 2018
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? #4812374
07/12/18 02:28 PM
07/12/18 02:28 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,408
PA
d00df00d Online content OP
d00df00d  Online Content OP
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,408
PA
In view of the fact that there's no free lunch: what are the potential downsides to chemistries aimed at reducing LSPI?

I know Ca has to be reduced, which means other detergent/dispersant additives need to be bumped up. Does this have potential implications for ash generation and/or acid fighting ability? I'd imagine any such problems can be and are being addressed in the total formulation. But if so, that still leaves the question of whether there's ever a case in which, say, an SN/GF-5 oil might be preferable to a comparable SN Plus oil -- kind of like how MB 229.51 is better than MB 229.5 on paper, but you don't want to use 229.51 for long drains in a gasoline engine where fuel might have too much sulfur.

Anyone know?


2008 BMW M3
Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: d00df00d] #4812395
07/12/18 02:45 PM
07/12/18 02:45 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13,537
Chicago, IL
dparm Offline
dparm  Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13,537
Chicago, IL
Might be worth looking into the second-gen Dexos stuff, as LSPI became a priority for them in this new cert. I've heard that sometimes magnesium is increased.

The new Mobil 1 ESP Formula 0w40 actually has a rather mediocre starting TBN of 8.5 despite being dexos2. I've not seen a VOA of this oil yet.

Also, previous discussion we had about it:
https://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/4203943/Re:_LSPI_w/Direct_Injection


2017 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport
Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: dparm] #4812455
07/12/18 03:55 PM
07/12/18 03:55 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,188
Oakville, Ontario
Patman Offline
Patman  Offline
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,188
Oakville, Ontario
Originally Posted By: dparm

The new Mobil 1 ESP Formula 0w40 actually has a rather mediocre starting TBN of 8.5 despite being dexos2. I've not seen a VOA of this oil yet.


In a case like that, I don't think TBN needs to be a big priority, considering that oil is geared for high performance GM engines and the oil life monitors in those cars won't really let them go much beyond 7-8k and in a lot of cases people will be hitting the one year mark before that mileage, so a much greater number of people using this new oil will probably be changing it well before it even hits 5k.

At the same time, it's possible that even with this new oil having a lower TBN to start, it could have better TBN retention than other oils. After 5000 miles it's possible that it'll only drop from 8.5 to 5, while in that same time frame it's also possible that an oil with a starting TBN of 10 might drop like a stone and end up around 4 after 5k of service.


2018 Corvette, 9k, M1 ESP Formula 5w30 & NAPA Gold
2006 Civic EX Coupe, 148k, PUP 5w20 & Fram Ultra
2010 BMW 328i X-Drive,110k, GC 0w40 & Fram Ultra

Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: d00df00d] #4812480
07/12/18 04:15 PM
07/12/18 04:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,096
Fredericksburg, VA
JAG Offline
JAG  Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,096
Fredericksburg, VA
You don’t want good TBN retention. You want the bases to neutralize as much of the acids as possible and as quickly as possible. By laws of nature, this reduces the amount of available base...TBN goes down. You do want enough TBN but not due it to “retaining” it; you want it due to it starting at a high value for your OCI. You want TAN to increase as little as possible.

I don’t like Mg detergents because of the following paper: http://www.oil-lab.com/downloads/TBN-1.pdf

Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: d00df00d] #4812489
07/12/18 04:36 PM
07/12/18 04:36 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,627
Western S.C.
CR94 Online content
CR94  Online Content
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,627
Western S.C.
The biggest downside might be increased cost, for customers who didn't need to worry about LSPI in the first place.


2011 Toyota Prius now at 94K
1981 Mazda GLC (323) retired at 606K
1972 Subaru DL retired at 190K
1954 Chevrolet retired at 121K
Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: d00df00d] #4812496
07/12/18 04:52 PM
07/12/18 04:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,919
NJ
buster Offline
buster  Offline
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,919
NJ
Higher corrosive bearing wear. Ideally, if GDI didn't come out, I believe the formulators would have preferred to stick with the with Ca. The new engines and emissions systems certainly pose challeges to formulators.

Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: buster] #4812528
07/12/18 05:29 PM
07/12/18 05:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,408
PA
d00df00d Online content OP
d00df00d  Online Content OP
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,408
PA
Originally Posted By: buster
Higher corrosive bearing wear.

Yikes!

Are you saying this tends to be an effect of the additives that make up for the loss of Ca, or that it's a net effect of the overall formulation of the finished lube?


2008 BMW M3
Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: d00df00d] #4812566
07/12/18 06:03 PM
07/12/18 06:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 493
WA
OilUzer Offline
OilUzer  Offline
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 493
WA
Along the same line, I asked a question a while back regarding d1g2 oils ... My question/concern was if these oils (having more or less of some chemicals to combat lspi in DI engines) may not necessarily be the best choice for pfi engines ...
The reason I asked the question was because we have one DI car and all our other cars are all PFI.

The consensus (not many people chimed in) was "to use it (d1g2) with confidence" for pfi cars ...

Obviously I don't have the knowledge or any scientific data to go against the above recommendation, However my gut feeling says there is always a trade off and I have a hard time with "one size fits all" theory ... I am sure top guns will jump on my "gut feeling" vs. scientific data ... but what can I say, I am a little suspicious. lol

Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: d00df00d] #4812596
07/12/18 06:37 PM
07/12/18 06:37 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,919
NJ
buster Offline
buster  Offline
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,919
NJ
Originally Posted By: d00df00d
Originally Posted By: buster
Higher corrosive bearing wear.

Yikes!

Are you saying this tends to be an effect of the additives that make up for the loss of Ca, or that it's a net effect of the overall formulation of the finished lube?


I doubt it. There are probably ways around it. It’s what gives chemists and formulators job security. smile. Think about it though, almost all the SN+/dexos 2 oils are using some mg.

Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: CR94] #4812658
07/12/18 07:32 PM
07/12/18 07:32 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13,537
Chicago, IL
dparm Offline
dparm  Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13,537
Chicago, IL
Originally Posted By: CR94
The biggest downside might be increased cost, for customers who didn't need to worry about LSPI in the first place.


Why would consumers not need to worry about LSPI? Are you saying that it's not something the average person needs to think about, or that it's not even happening?


2017 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport
Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: d00df00d] #4812673
07/12/18 07:39 PM
07/12/18 07:39 PM
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 493
WA
OilUzer Offline
OilUzer  Offline
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 493
WA
Isn't lspi a concern only for DI (Turbo? DI) engines?
If I don't have a DI, why should I accept the shortcomings (if any)?

Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: OilUzer] #4812682
07/12/18 07:43 PM
07/12/18 07:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 6,482
...
PimTac Offline
PimTac  Offline
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 6,482
...
Originally Posted By: OilUzer
Isn't lspi a concern only for DI (Turbo? DI) engines?
If I don't have a DI, why should I accept the shortcomings (if any)?




Are there shortcomings? That is conjecture on your part.


Cannot see signatures any longer so it doesn’t matter.
Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: dparm] #4812709
07/12/18 08:01 PM
07/12/18 08:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,627
Western S.C.
CR94 Online content
CR94  Online Content
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,627
Western S.C.
Originally Posted By: dparm
Originally Posted By: CR94
The biggest downside might be increased cost, for customers who didn't need to worry about LSPI in the first place.
Why would consumers not need to worry about LSPI? Are you saying that it's not something the average person needs to think about, or that it's not even happening?
No, I'm saying LSPI is something consumers who won't be using the oil in engines vulnerable to LSPI don't need to worry about. They'll have to help pay for the changes, though.

Last edited by CR94; 07/12/18 08:03 PM.

2011 Toyota Prius now at 94K
1981 Mazda GLC (323) retired at 606K
1972 Subaru DL retired at 190K
1954 Chevrolet retired at 121K
Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: OilUzer] #4812711
07/12/18 08:02 PM
07/12/18 08:02 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,408
PA
d00df00d Online content OP
d00df00d  Online Content OP
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,408
PA
Originally Posted By: OilUzer
Along the same line, I asked a question a while back regarding d1g2 oils ... My question/concern was if these oils (having more or less of some chemicals to combat lspi in DI engines) may not necessarily be the best choice for pfi engines ...
The reason I asked the question was because we have one DI car and all our other cars are all PFI.

The consensus (not many people chimed in) was "to use it (d1g2) with confidence" for pfi cars ...

Obviously I don't have the knowledge or any scientific data to go against the above recommendation, However my gut feeling says there is always a trade off and I have a hard time with "one size fits all" theory ... I am sure top guns will jump on my "gut feeling" vs. scientific data ... but what can I say, I am a little suspicious. lol


"Use it with confidence" just means it'll be fine. Which it's supposed to be, and likely will be. API didn't relax any of SN's requirements for SN Plus, so any SN Plus product will meet specs for API SN applications.

That's a different ballgame from what's best. If finding that is your goal, you're not looking for something that just meets the standards; you're looking for something that exceeds them by as much as your budget will allow.

I have to imagine it's easier to exceed SN specs if you don't have to worry about LSPI. If that turns out to be true, then it might be more likely that the "best" oil for a PFI application is more likely to be SN than SN Plus.

Unfortunately, that kind of vague suspicion is about as far as you can go, because no formulator is going to publish more than a tidbit or two about the margin by which their products beat any given standard. It's good enough for my purposes, which is why I asked this question -- but no way on earth is it a good way to find the "best" oil for any given application.


2008 BMW M3
Re: Known downsides to LSPI-oriented formulations? [Re: PimTac] #4812812
07/12/18 10:43 PM
07/12/18 10:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 619
Canada
nap Offline
nap  Offline
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 619
Canada
Originally Posted By: PimTac
Originally Posted By: OilUzer
Isn't lspi a concern only for DI (Turbo? DI) engines?
If I don't have a DI, why should I accept the shortcomings (if any)?




Are there shortcomings? That is conjecture on your part.


Are you suggesting that one should not ask a question for which he doesn’t already have the answer? That is [censored] on your part.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™