Recent Topics
Crane EE 5301 Humidifier
by maverickfhs. 12/15/18 02:38 PM
I have sinned
by 901Memphis. 12/15/18 01:57 PM
Milwaukee m12 in vanhaus ratchet
by pda1122. 12/15/18 01:19 PM
Klein dikes
by Donald. 12/15/18 01:03 PM
Help Soldering 3.5mm mono microphone plug
by Brybo86. 12/15/18 01:02 PM
Small Trolling Motors
by wings&wheels. 12/15/18 12:49 PM
Toyota Corolla, good and bad?
by jongies3. 12/15/18 12:35 PM
Mixing oils
by bfleeman. 12/15/18 10:51 AM
Ebay 10% off Tech 15% off everything else*.
by demarpaint. 12/15/18 10:39 AM
Milwaukee Fuel M12 Ratchet 1/4” vs 3/8”
by Snagglefoot. 12/15/18 10:16 AM
Hifly Hf 805
by chrisri. 12/15/18 10:00 AM
Preferred 5.3L L83 Oil Filter
by zfasts03. 12/15/18 09:58 AM
sonata plastic fork starter failed three times.
by JustinH. 12/15/18 09:17 AM
HVAC Problems
by WTJackalope. 12/15/18 09:15 AM
Rough Idle after short trip
by Datarock. 12/15/18 09:07 AM
Homelite 360
by mobilaltima. 12/15/18 09:04 AM
Lovin' the Etec!
by IndyFan. 12/15/18 06:10 AM
Air Impact Wrench
by BenZahel. 12/15/18 05:19 AM
Luber finer 750 bypass oil filter info
by BigRich954. 12/15/18 03:59 AM
Newest Members
Spkrdctr, torchredone12, JNG, Edmundo, NEKGuy
66688 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
77 registered members (77GrandPrix, anndel, andyd, 71Chevyguy, aba4430, 13 invisible), 1,832 guests, and 37 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics295,112
Posts4,927,982
Members66,688
Most Online2,553
Oct 27th, 2018
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... #4808964
07/09/18 08:52 AM
07/09/18 08:52 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,225
KC
badtlc Offline OP
badtlc  Offline OP
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,225
KC
I'm starting to look into these newer Cherokees. They look very nice and they have a traditional transmission and MPFI engine with a lower compression ratio.

Are there any issues to watch out for with these Jeeps? Are they DIY friendly for the most part? Is 184hp adequate for 4x4?

Thanks for any advice or feedback you can give.


2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, M1 AFE 0W20, Fram TG, 167k
2015 Chrysler T&C, 80k+, M1 AFE 0W20, Fram TG OF
2018 Forester Premium
Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: badtlc] #4808968
07/09/18 08:58 AM
07/09/18 08:58 AM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,537
Tri State Conservative
Zee09 Offline
Zee09  Offline
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,537
Tri State Conservative
One good test drive would answer most of that with the exception of longevity.
In the end it doesn't matter if I love a vehicle. In the end you have to live with it. Why let others skew your decisions?


"If I walked on water, they'd say I couldn't swim."
Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: badtlc] #4808974
07/09/18 09:00 AM
07/09/18 09:00 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,985
NY
demarpaint Offline
demarpaint  Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,985
NY
They use the 9 speed ZF which I've read and heard were problematic, unlike the 8 speed used in the GC which is highly praised. I'm sure I'll catch some heat from happy owners. There is a lot of info out there about it.


God Bless Our Troops

Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: Zee09] #4808977
07/09/18 09:01 AM
07/09/18 09:01 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,225
KC
badtlc Offline OP
badtlc  Offline OP
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,225
KC
Originally Posted By: Zee09
One good test drive would answer most of that with the exception of longevity.
In the end it doesn't matter if I love a vehicle. In the end you have to live with it. Why let others skew your decisions?


Not asking for them to form my own opinion. I'm asking to know about weak spots or things to look for. I can't really find much on the jeep forums about these so I can't tell if people generally like them with no issues or if all the complaints are stored somewhere else online. Never hurts to get feedback. Someone might dislike something I wouldn't have thought about.

For example, before buying my T&C, it was advised on here to avoid 2014 an older models because of undersized brakes. That was a valuable piece of advice that helped me.


2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, M1 AFE 0W20, Fram TG, 167k
2015 Chrysler T&C, 80k+, M1 AFE 0W20, Fram TG OF
2018 Forester Premium
Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: badtlc] #4808983
07/09/18 09:06 AM
07/09/18 09:06 AM
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 79
appalachia va
troutfisher Offline
troutfisher  Offline
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 79
appalachia va
As far as DIY goes,it complicated because normal stuff is easy,but any check engine lights or 4wd issues they have to go the dealer,they have some interesting electronics on them,mainly because fiat has a part in it.But that being said,I see the some early 2.4 Cherokees with 100+k with no major issues,but honestly what brand new car doesn't have complex computers

Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: badtlc] #4808984
07/09/18 09:06 AM
07/09/18 09:06 AM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,537
Tri State Conservative
Zee09 Offline
Zee09  Offline
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,537
Tri State Conservative
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: Zee09
One good test drive would answer most of that with the exception of longevity.
In the end it doesn't matter if I love a vehicle. In the end you have to live with it. Why let others skew your decisions?


Not asking for them to form my own opinion. I'm asking to know about weak spots or things to look for. I can't really find much on the jeep forums about these so I can't tell if people generally like them with no issues or if all the complaints are stored somewhere else online. Never hurts to get feedback. Someone might dislike something I wouldn't have thought about.

For example, before buying my T&C, it was advised on here to avoid 2014 an older models because of undersized brakes. That was a valuable piece of advice that helped me.



True. Sometimes too much feedback paralyses people....lol
I never had much luck with Jeep even back in the AMC days.
Bad mpg and low reliability, but hey things change!


"If I walked on water, they'd say I couldn't swim."
Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: badtlc] #4808989
07/09/18 09:13 AM
07/09/18 09:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 411
new jersey
hemitruck Offline
hemitruck  Offline
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 411
new jersey
My wife owns a 2016 jeep Cherokee limited. We live in area with lots of hills and a test drive made the 4 cylinder engine feel under powered. We opted for the 6 cyl. She loves it. The trans was an issue for the 14 and 15 model years. Software and hardware changes have corrected these issues. Ours has been completely reliable.

Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: hemitruck] #4809021
07/09/18 09:35 AM
07/09/18 09:35 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,559
Storrs, Connecticut
jeepman3071 Offline
jeepman3071  Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,559
Storrs, Connecticut
Originally Posted By: hemitruck
My wife owns a 2016 jeep Cherokee limited. We live in area with lots of hills and a test drive made the 4 cylinder engine feel under powered. We opted for the 6 cyl. She loves it. The trans was an issue for the 14 and 15 model years. Software and hardware changes have corrected these issues. Ours has been completely reliable.


Yup.

The main issue was the 9 speed auto having some teething issues for the first few model years. Sometimes transmission programming fixed them, but a few people had entire transmissions replaced under warranty. The 2016+ models are supposed to be better.


2000 Jeep Cherokee 4.0L (181k) - Pennzoil 10w30, Napa Gold 1516, Magnefine trans filter
2009 BMW 328i (36k) - Castrol Edge Euro 0w40, MANN HU816X
Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: badtlc] #4809039
07/09/18 09:53 AM
07/09/18 09:53 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,806
Texas
440Magnum Offline
440Magnum  Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,806
Texas
I own a Grand Cherokee, and my big disappointment with the regular Cherokee (apart from silly styling elements) is that its a front-drive platform with a limited 4x4 capability scabbed on, just like the current Explorer, the new Blazer, and far too many modern compact SUVs. Actually its a little better than those in that the Explorer is really JUST FWD with an on-demand connection to the rear axle ONLY when front-wheel slip is detected, but the Cherokee is still FWD at its core. The Grand Cherokee is still a real rear-drive based 4x4 with an honest-to-god locking transfer case in 4-low range, although electronic intervention with the ABS does what would be done by limited slip or locking diffs in an old-school Jeep.

As far as reliability, the first couple years were problematic with the 9-speed ZF transaxle, but I'm not hearing much about that anymore. The Pentastar v6 is bulletproof, I know very little about the Tigershark but again, NOT hearing bad things is generally good. A quick glance at some Jeep forums seems to indicate most people are generally happy with it.


'66 Dodge Polara & '69 Dodge Coronet R/T both 440/727
'08 Ram 1500 4.7/545RFE
'12 Challenger SRT8 392/6-speed
'99 XJ 4x4 4.0/AX15, '14 WK2 4x4 3.6/8HP
Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: badtlc] #4809043
07/09/18 09:57 AM
07/09/18 09:57 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 528
Minnesota
Huie83 Offline
Huie83  Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 528
Minnesota
I don't have one but a co-worker of mine does, its a early 2017. It's currently being bought back due to transmission issues they can't fix. Basically, you floor it and it hardly goes anywhere. Scary when trying to pull out into traffic. They replaced the trans computer as well as the trans, still the same issues and they can't figure it out. It's been in the shop a ton, at one point for something like 40 days.

She love it besides that though and is swapping into a 2018/2019 in the next week or so. They were pretty good about processing the lemon claim on it. The dealer handled it all, no lawyer needed.

Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: 440Magnum] #4809077
07/09/18 10:26 AM
07/09/18 10:26 AM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,225
KC
badtlc Offline OP
badtlc  Offline OP
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,225
KC
Originally Posted By: 440Magnum
I own a Grand Cherokee, and my big disappointment with the regular Cherokee (apart from silly styling elements) is that its a front-drive platform with a limited 4x4 capability scabbed on, just like the current Explorer, the new Blazer, and far too many modern compact SUVs.


From the videos I have seen, it appears to be a VERY capable system. I'd prefer FWD biased but is this 4x4 very capable or is this something poor like the Honda AWD system?


2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, M1 AFE 0W20, Fram TG, 167k
2015 Chrysler T&C, 80k+, M1 AFE 0W20, Fram TG OF
2018 Forester Premium
Re: 2016+ Cherokee 2.4L 4x4 research... [Re: badtlc] #4809632
07/09/18 07:39 PM
07/09/18 07:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 773
Sask, Canada
BrianF Offline
BrianF  Offline
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 773
Sask, Canada
My BIL has been running a 3.6 powered Cherokee for several years now. Other than the usual wear items, he has had no issues in well over 200,000km of use. He plans to buy another when this one wears out.

Now his sees some city and mostly highway miles and very limited grid road driving. So cant testify how great it works off road or how much the chassis can take a beating.


2006 Trailblazer LT. QSUD with Fram Ultra.
2017 Ram 3500 SLT Megacab. Duron SHP 10w30 with Hastings LF608.
1993 GMC 1500. QSAD with Fram PH5

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™