Recent Topics
Ford 289 Engine Oil
by Building3
08/21/18 08:35 AM
FOLLOW UP
by Baseball17
08/21/18 08:12 AM
Student loans starting to bite the economy
by Mr Nice
08/21/18 07:51 AM
BMW N55 and B58 Technical Guide
by BMWTurboDzl
08/21/18 06:41 AM
Halfords "Classic" Oil
by Ducked
08/21/18 05:59 AM
Ac Delco 0/20 - 2015 3.7l TiVTC. (5109 Mi)
by DuckRyder
08/21/18 05:06 AM
M1 @ WM $22.88
by dlundblad
08/21/18 04:58 AM
The BEST $500 car in history!!!
by Vladiator
08/21/18 02:03 AM
Mazda Skyactiv revolutionises internal combustion engine
by KnicksGiants
08/21/18 01:19 AM
M1 10W-30 (non-GF5) High Mileage now SN Plus
by 1JZ_E46
08/20/18 11:56 PM
Family and Medical Leave Act - Insights Needed
by BrownBox88
08/20/18 10:52 PM
Mobil 1 Turbo Diesel Tuck Oil
by Snagglefoot
08/20/18 10:39 PM
diesel welder/generators
by motor_oil_madman
08/20/18 10:30 PM
Give me air? (AC)
by daves87rs
08/20/18 10:25 PM
car insurance logic ?
by DzoG20
08/20/18 10:06 PM
Why buy conventional if synthetic costs slightly more?
by KnicksGiants
08/20/18 09:39 PM
How much do shops pay for their motor oil?
by KnicksGiants
08/20/18 09:14 PM
This Oil Change Special is Just Too Sweeeeet.
by TheLawnRanger
08/20/18 08:59 PM
Best "Cheap" Handgun
by john_pifer
08/20/18 08:45 PM
How's about new/old school...0w20 winter/5w30 summer?
by Dad2leia
08/20/18 08:31 PM
Newest Members
CHHBadkarma, Lynniecee, KeithSalmon, Camaro_Noah, Climb2FL350
65755 Registered Users
Who's Online
91 registered (A_Harman, andyd, Astro14, 69Torino, 2015_PSD, 330indy, 15 invisible), 1471 Guests and 34 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
65755 Members
67 Forums
289062 Topics
4821257 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#4777375 - 06/04/18 03:51 PM Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy
NICAT Offline


Registered: 04/05/18
Posts: 64
Loc: Azerbaijan
Hi.
Why driving at higher speed (Even if we drive at the highest gear at low rpm) cause more fuel consumption?
Can you please tell me how to calculate (predict) the most optimum speed & rpm ranges for fuel economy ?
Regards


Edited by NICAT (06/04/18 03:52 PM)

Top
#4777380 - 06/04/18 03:54 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
dbias Online   content


Registered: 12/24/14
Posts: 177
Loc: USA
Aerodynamic drag. In the US chasing the all important epa mpg numbers the sweet spot is around 55 mph as the test drive cycle has a lot of that so engineers are rewarded for optimizing gearing for that speed.


Edited by dbias (06/04/18 04:23 PM)
_________________________
2011 VW JETTA Castrol Edge 0W-40
2012 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT Castrol Edge 5W-20
2016 HONDA CIVIC COUPE Castrol Edge 0W-20
2017 AUDI A4 Ravenol SSL 0W-40

Top
#4777384 - 06/04/18 03:56 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
E365 Offline


Registered: 12/16/07
Posts: 479
Loc: USA
Generally, drag increases at the square of velocity. So, when your speed doubles, the drag your car has to push against goes up by 4x.

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/rocket/vel.html

I’ve heard it said that best fuel economy will be in top gear, just above the speed where the engine is lugging. For many vehicles this would be very roughly 40-45 MPH (65-73 km/h). ** I have no factual data to show this correct, but it seems accurate from my observations. **


Edited by E365 (06/04/18 04:01 PM)
_________________________
Whatever’s on sale...

Top
#4777404 - 06/04/18 04:09 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
VeryNoisyPoet Offline


Registered: 12/16/17
Posts: 350
Loc: Massachusetts
As the vehicle moves faster, it must push the air out of the way faster, which causes more drag and takes more engine power. This is not linear, with the equation being 1/2 x air density x drag coefficient x cross sectional area x speed^2. So a small increase in speed can cause a large increase in drag. Tires will also cause more drag with higher speed, but this is linear and quite small compared to air drag.

Inside the engine and transmission, parasitic load from the water pump, oil pump, fan, and internal friction consume more energy at higher RPM. Additionally, an engine has to work harder to overcome its own air pumping losses at higher speeds. But an engine operated too slow and out of its power band will need to work harder and require frequent changing of gears, which reduces economy.

Every engine and vehicle will be different, so often it is best to experiment with different speeds. In general, there will be a sweet spot where the engine has enough power to cruise without bogging down but RPM is not high enough to cause excessive drag. For example, my automatic transmission car has a fuel economy peak between 55 and 65 mph (1980 to 2340 RPM). This is a sweet spot for boost, torque, and efficiency in my case, where the torque converter can remain locked 99% of the time. Below those speeds economy tapers off slowly because of unlocking converter and more frequent gear changes; above those speeds economy drops sharply as both engine drag and air drag increase.

A manual transmission gives much better control and has no torque converter or pumping losses like an automatic, which is why manual transmission versions of the same vehicle will often get significantly higher fuel economy when handled by a skilled driver.
_________________________
1998 V70 GLT / 192k miles [10w-30 Valvoline Syn w/ Maxlife Tech + Mann W917 filter]

"Use yah blinkah!"

"Be nice. The alternative involves an air horn and 7000 lumens of high beam."

Top
#4777412 - 06/04/18 04:15 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
WobblyElvis Offline


Registered: 09/23/14
Posts: 1424
Loc: Toronto Canada
A fun calculator dealing with drag and mileage can be found here...
http://ecomodder.com/forum/tool-aero-rolling-resistance.php

Top
#4777414 - 06/04/18 04:19 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
Trav Offline


Registered: 11/20/06
Posts: 19658
Loc: MA, Mittelfranken.de
BMW some years ago said the engines are most efficient at 2,900 RPM. Right or wrong I have no idea.
_________________________
ASE L1, Master. Deutsch Meisterbrief.

Top
#4777425 - 06/04/18 04:27 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
JAG Offline


Registered: 10/23/05
Posts: 4930
Loc: Fredericksburg, VA
Being in top gear a small amount above the lowest speed that the engine doesn’t feel like it’s lugging is a good rule of thumb for best fuel economy, as E365 said. That will be too slow for some roads/highways. Avoiding brisk or hard acceleration will help because the air-fuel ratio is likely enriched to avoid detonation. Also with automatic transmissions, the shift points will move to higher rpms.

If you want to get more precise than the rule of thumb, you should try to find the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC, see link below) data for your engine and use that along with some calculations to find out how to drive most efficiently. If you have a real-time readout of your gas mileage, you can experiment with driving on flat ground to see which gear gives best gas mileage at different speeds or different speeds in the same gear.
https://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=363722

Top
#4777430 - 06/04/18 04:34 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
JLTD Offline


Registered: 12/15/17
Posts: 942
Loc: US
Originally Posted By: NICAT
Hi.
Why driving at higher speed (Even if we drive at the highest gear at low rpm) cause more fuel consumption?
Can you please tell me how to calculate (predict) the most optimum speed & rpm ranges for fuel economy ?
Regards


Minimize aerodynamic drag and maximize engine efficiency for that speed. It may not be the highest gear....as an example my Toyota gets 30+mpg in 4th gear(it is a 5 speed auto) at 40mph/65kph; that is the highest I have observed.
_________________________
Hers: 2008 Jeep Liberty 138k, AMSOIL® SS 5w30/Amsoil

His: 2015 4Runner 41k, AMSOIL® OE 5w20/Wix

Top
#4777463 - 06/04/18 05:04 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: Trav]
wha232 Offline


Registered: 04/04/10
Posts: 24
Loc: PA
My Honda Fit has about a 3-4 mpg difference between 70 mph and 60 mph

Top
#4777490 - 06/04/18 05:47 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
ZZman Offline


Registered: 03/17/08
Posts: 5911
Loc: Michigan
If I hold my hand out the window making wavy motions my mpg goes down a little. If I hold my hand out in a open palm position it goes way down.
_________________________
2003 Mercury Grand Marquis. Rotella T6 Multi-Vehicle oil
2008 Sebring Hardtop convertible. Rotella T6 Multi-Vehicle oil
2006 Kawasaki Vulcan 900 LT. Amsoil Metric 10w-40

Top
#4777497 - 06/04/18 05:59 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
Uphill_Both_Ways Offline


Registered: 11/06/17
Posts: 75
Loc: Winnipeg
My '08 Impala with GM's 3.5-litre engine returns five to 5.1 litres per 100 kilometres, or 55 to 56 mpg imperial at 70 km/h (42 mph) on billiard-table-flat ground (which we have plenty of) in summer temperatures and no wind. The engine turns over at 1,100 or 1,150 rpm (the tach is too course for an exact reading) in fourth (top) gear.

This drops to 40 to 42 mpg imperial at 100 km/h (62 mph) under the same conditions, then drops precipitously at 110 to 120 km/h. At 120 it returns 26 to 27 mpg imperial, thanks to all that speed-manufactured wind.

I have no feel for U.S. gallons, which Canada didn't use pre-metric. The speedo, odometer and fuel-usage computer can be switched to "English" for travel in the States, but the mileage computation is in U.S. gallons, despite the "English" setting. So I use a laminated cheat sheet.
_________________________
2008 Impala 3.5

Top
#4777509 - 06/04/18 06:10 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: ZZman]
bbhero Offline


Registered: 03/20/15
Posts: 4842
Loc: Virginia
Funny post ZZ LOL

But your pain index goes up to 10 if a hornet or wasp happens to hit your open palm going down the road.
_________________________
Nissan Altima 3.5 Coupe
Quaker State High Mileage 5w30 Purolator Boss 14610
"Treat your family like your friends and treat your friends like your family."

Top
#4777523 - 06/04/18 06:22 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
fdcg27 Offline


Registered: 09/25/09
Posts: 15919
Loc: OH
It requires more power to go faster regardless of engine revs.
To make more power the engine must burn more fuel.
Total drag is the difference and it increases with speed.
This seems intuitively obvious.
_________________________
17 Forester 12K MSS 0W-20
12 Accord LX 92K PP 5W-20
09 Forester 95K M1HM 10W-30
01 Focus ZX3 118K PP 5W-20
96 Accord LX 104K T5 10W-30
95 318i

Top
#4777579 - 06/04/18 07:24 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
CR94 Offline


Registered: 03/20/16
Posts: 1289
Loc: Western S.C. since 1996
The basics:

Aerodynamic drag is proportional to the square of speed, therefore the energy required to overcome it for a particular distance is too. That also means power required to overcome aero drag is proportionate to the cube of the speed.

At low speeds, aero drag, which is almost independent of speed, is smaller than tire drag. (The speed at which they're equal obviously varies with the vehicle, but is typically around 35-40 mph.)
_________________________
2011 Toyota Prius now at 92K
1981 Mazda GLC (323) retired at 606K
1972 Subaru DL retired at 190K
1954 Chevrolet retired at 121K

Top
#4777591 - 06/04/18 07:39 PM Re: Speed / RPM / Fuel Economy [Re: NICAT]
supton Online   content


Registered: 11/09/08
Posts: 12344
Loc: NH
Measure and repeat.

I have not spent the time to verify but I swear, my truck does better at 45-50mph and in 5th than it does at 6th at 60mph. Wind drag goes up fast, and worse, it won't hold a hill in sixth at only 60mph. And it just can't do 50mph at sixth (though it tries). But in general, slower speed in topmost gear is best. As is only going downhill with a tailwind.

You can get a Scanguage (not sure if the app Torq does likewise) and have instant mpg readout, if your car lacks one. That can give some real time feedback, faster than the standard "do something over three tanks".
_________________________
2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 163k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 144k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 187k, his

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >