Recent Topics
Walmart and Valvoline
by Bullwinkle007. 01/22/19 09:10 PM
Getting Our Kicks On Route 66
by 2015_PSD. 01/22/19 08:40 PM
Uploading a short film clip from an IPhone.
by Snagglefoot. 01/22/19 07:52 PM
Purolator L34631 (torn media)
by LDM. 01/22/19 07:51 PM
THIS close to getting a VDB today at TPA
by 14Accent. 01/22/19 07:48 PM
Supco Appliance Parts.
by George7941. 01/22/19 07:36 PM
Unusual Jury summons.
by Chris142. 01/22/19 06:31 PM
Vibration feeling after new tires installed?
by MONKEYMAN. 01/22/19 05:51 PM
Sudden Shake - ‘18 Accord
by Throt. 01/22/19 05:43 PM
05 Ford 500 Intake hole - melted
by Geauxtiger. 01/22/19 05:41 PM
How's K&N 1004 on Kia/Hyundai GDI
by SlavaB. 01/22/19 05:18 PM
more PSD woes with cold weather
by Donald. 01/22/19 05:10 PM
Can someone do a UOA on AmazonBasics oil?
by ThunderOne. 01/22/19 04:03 PM
Any analysis on the Mobil 1 0W-40 ESP Dexos 2?
by fnbrowning. 01/22/19 04:02 PM
Cat sick
by Eddie. 01/22/19 03:49 PM
Lubeguard
by hardheaded. 01/22/19 02:10 PM
OEM Cap & Rotor when changing spark plugs?
by paulri. 01/22/19 01:50 PM
A young boy...
by JLTD. 01/22/19 01:34 PM
Newest Members
73guna, Tedee, JayF, Sam002, Binco
67013 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
76 registered members (209paulc, AdRock, 69GTX, askani79705, asiancivicmaniac, 9 invisible), 1,201 guests, and 36 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics297,006
Posts4,963,327
Members67,013
Most Online2,821
Jan 21st, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Ram Pentastar towing #4752684
05/10/18 07:00 AM
05/10/18 07:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
Just for fun yesterday I perused Ram's website for the V6 quad cab truck in regards to towing. I was kinda surprised: if you order with 3.21 rear gearing (4x4, quad not crew, 6'4" bed) it is about 4,400 lb rated. But with the slightly deeper gearing of 3.55 it jumps to 7,400 lb. Seems a rather large jump for something that has relatively close spaced gear ratios in the 8AT. I mean, takeoff ratio is better (11%), but that's just off the line, and after that it shouldn't matter. Transmission picks the gear required for the rpm to make enough hp to accomplish what is being asked of it.

shrug

Watched a TFL vid the other night where they ran the Ecodiesel up the Ike. They seemed a bit taken back that it wouldn't do more than 55mph. 420ft-lb torque is nice, but in the end, once moving, 240 hp is still only 240 hp. At least it was still (mostly) 240hp & not suffering from altitude power loss like a NA engine would.


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 176k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 145k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 199k, his
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: supton] #4752696
05/10/18 07:14 AM
05/10/18 07:14 AM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,789
Indiana
dlundblad Offline
dlundblad  Offline
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,789
Indiana
3.21 for towing does seem useless.


03 Jeep WJ 4.0 202k Edge 10w40 HM Fram XG16
02 Volvo S60 2.4T 186k M1 0w40 Mahle OX149D
97 Chevy Blazer 4.3 153k Synpower 5w30 Supertech ST3980 (Ecore)

Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: dlundblad] #4752709
05/10/18 07:27 AM
05/10/18 07:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
Originally Posted By: dlundblad
3.21 for towing does seem useless.


it does, but... 4.71:1 first gear.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZF_8HP_transmission

4.71x3.21 is an impressive 15.1:1 takeoff ratio. 4.71x3.55 is 16.7:1. I wonder if at that point torque management is required with the Pentastar.

My truck by comparison is 3.52x4.1 or 14.4:1. The mighty 5.7 version is 3.33x4.3 or 14.3:1. But my 4.6 and the 5.7 do have a torque advantage, at 2,000 rpm (plus whatever the torque convertor adds for multiplication).


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 176k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 145k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 199k, his
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: supton] #4752737
05/10/18 07:52 AM
05/10/18 07:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,280
Texas
WyrTwister Offline
WyrTwister  Offline
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,280
Texas
Tire diameter also plays a part .


Wyr
God bless
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: supton] #4752771
05/10/18 08:23 AM
05/10/18 08:23 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,197
Canuck living in California
KrisZ Online content
KrisZ  Online Content
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,197
Canuck living in California
HP do doesn't tow, it determines the rate of acceleration and top speed, torque is what does the towing. Lowering the final drive ratio increases the torque at the wheels, hence a bump in the towing capacity.


2015 Dodge Grand Caravan-30k miles.
2007 Ford Focus ZX3-110k miles
2006 Mazda 3-168k miles
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: supton] #4752800
05/10/18 08:51 AM
05/10/18 08:51 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
Torque is applied force while hp is how fast work is (or can be) done. On an engine with a flat torque curve, downshifting does two things: it increases applied force (through gear multiplication), and it also gets the engine spinning to a higher hp level. The vehicle (usually) accelerates when doing this.

I'm not sure you can separate tq from hp. You can't use gear multiplication to make more hp, but with the right gearing you can get the engine to sit at a certain hp.

The difference between 3.21 and 3.55 is 11%. 11% more torque if you'd like, in a given gear, or 11% more hp at a given vehicle speed. But that's way more than an 11% bump in towing. Clicking down through the gears, 8th->7th is 26%, 7->6 is 19%, 6->5 is 29%, 5->4 is 30%, 4->3 is 26%, 3->2 is 49% and 2->1 is 50%. So, what I'm thinking is, once moving, running one gear lower is more of a tq bump than what dropping from 3.21 to 3.55 is.


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 176k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 145k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 199k, his
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: supton] #4752805
05/10/18 08:54 AM
05/10/18 08:54 AM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,789
Indiana
dlundblad Offline
dlundblad  Offline
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,789
Indiana
Originally Posted By: supton
Originally Posted By: dlundblad
3.21 for towing does seem useless.


it does, but... 4.71:1 first gear.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZF_8HP_transmission

4.71x3.21 is an impressive 15.1:1 takeoff ratio. 4.71x3.55 is 16.7:1. I wonder if at that point torque management is required with the Pentastar.

My truck by comparison is 3.52x4.1 or 14.4:1. The mighty 5.7 version is 3.33x4.3 or 14.3:1. But my 4.6 and the 5.7 do have a torque advantage, at 2,000 rpm (plus whatever the torque convertor adds for multiplication).


How would this handle at highway speeds though?


03 Jeep WJ 4.0 202k Edge 10w40 HM Fram XG16
02 Volvo S60 2.4T 186k M1 0w40 Mahle OX149D
97 Chevy Blazer 4.3 153k Synpower 5w30 Supertech ST3980 (Ecore)

Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: KrisZ] #4752812
05/10/18 09:02 AM
05/10/18 09:02 AM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,240
Ontario, Canada
IndyIan Offline
IndyIan  Offline
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,240
Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: KrisZ
HP do doesn't tow, it determines the rate of acceleration and top speed, torque is what does the towing. Lowering the final drive ratio increases the torque at the wheels, hence a bump in the towing capacity.

Well, torque multiplied by gearing is what tows. I doubt either rear end ratio will hold 8th with a 26' camper trailer behind them into any kind of headwind, so what does it matter if the truck runs in 7th with the 3.55 or 6th with the 3.21? Torque to the wheel will be the same, engine rpm will be close to the same. I suppose higher ratio rear ends run a bit cooler, but I doubt that is an issue.
Perhaps how the transmission is designed, running in certain gears for hours on end isn't good? or maybe the higher ratio diff comes with bigger rear brakes?


07 Focus ZXW, 5spd manual, 218km M1 5W30
18 Outback 2.5 CVT 15km 0W20
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: supton] #4752816
05/10/18 09:02 AM
05/10/18 09:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,280
Texas
WyrTwister Offline
WyrTwister  Offline
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,280
Texas
Originally Posted By: supton
Torque is applied force while hp is how fast work is (or can be) done. On an engine with a flat torque curve, downshifting does two things: it increases applied force (through gear multiplication), and it also gets the engine spinning to a higher hp level. The vehicle (usually) accelerates when doing this.

I'm not sure you can separate tq from hp. You can't use gear multiplication to make more hp, but with the right gearing you can get the engine to sit at a certain hp.

The difference between 3.21 and 3.55 is 11%. 11% more torque if you'd like, in a given gear, or 11% more hp at a given vehicle speed. But that's way more than an 11% bump in towing. Clicking down through the gears, 8th->7th is 26%, 7->6 is 19%, 6->5 is 29%, 5->4 is 30%, 4->3 is 26%, 3->2 is 49% and 2->1 is 50%. So, what I'm thinking is, once moving, running one gear lower is more of a tq bump than what dropping from 3.21 to 3.55 is.


I drove a delivery truck for several years , in my youth . All were gasoline powered , none with an engine larger than 366 ci , which many would consider way under powered . With enough gears , RPM's and realistic expectations , it did the job . 3250 RPM at 60 - 70 MPG was about where things ran . MPG was about 5 .


Wyr
God bless
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: dlundblad] #4752819
05/10/18 09:05 AM
05/10/18 09:05 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
Originally Posted By: dlundblad
Originally Posted By: supton
Originally Posted By: dlundblad
3.21 for towing does seem useless.


it does, but... 4.71:1 first gear.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZF_8HP_transmission

4.71x3.21 is an impressive 15.1:1 takeoff ratio. 4.71x3.55 is 16.7:1. I wonder if at that point torque management is required with the Pentastar.

My truck by comparison is 3.52x4.1 or 14.4:1. The mighty 5.7 version is 3.33x4.3 or 14.3:1. But my 4.6 and the 5.7 do have a torque advantage, at 2,000 rpm (plus whatever the torque convertor adds for multiplication).


How would this handle at highway speeds though?


Well, I doubt anyone would want to be running around cones at highway speeds... might be fun on a closed track, perhaps. Maybe you mean, how fast will it accelerate, 0-60 or 40-60? That'll depend upon the grade, wind resistance and one's tolerance of horns honking behind you.


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 176k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 145k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 199k, his
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: supton] #4752821
05/10/18 09:08 AM
05/10/18 09:08 AM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,789
Indiana
dlundblad Offline
dlundblad  Offline
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,789
Indiana
Originally Posted By: supton
Originally Posted By: dlundblad
Originally Posted By: supton
Originally Posted By: dlundblad
3.21 for towing does seem useless.


it does, but... 4.71:1 first gear.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZF_8HP_transmission

4.71x3.21 is an impressive 15.1:1 takeoff ratio. 4.71x3.55 is 16.7:1. I wonder if at that point torque management is required with the Pentastar.

My truck by comparison is 3.52x4.1 or 14.4:1. The mighty 5.7 version is 3.33x4.3 or 14.3:1. But my 4.6 and the 5.7 do have a torque advantage, at 2,000 rpm (plus whatever the torque convertor adds for multiplication).


How would this handle at highway speeds though?


Well, I doubt anyone would want to be running around cones at highway speeds... might be fun on a closed track, perhaps. Maybe you mean, how fast will it accelerate, 0-60 or 40-60? That'll depend upon the grade, wind resistance and one's tolerance of horns honking behind you.


Im talking just pulling a trailer at highway speeds with 3.21 gearing. How would this behave?

How about a 0 - 60 from a light or ~20 - 75 on an interstate ramp?


03 Jeep WJ 4.0 202k Edge 10w40 HM Fram XG16
02 Volvo S60 2.4T 186k M1 0w40 Mahle OX149D
97 Chevy Blazer 4.3 153k Synpower 5w30 Supertech ST3980 (Ecore)

Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: WyrTwister] #4752823
05/10/18 09:09 AM
05/10/18 09:09 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
Originally Posted By: WyrTwister
Originally Posted By: supton
Torque is applied force while hp is how fast work is (or can be) done. On an engine with a flat torque curve, downshifting does two things: it increases applied force (through gear multiplication), and it also gets the engine spinning to a higher hp level. The vehicle (usually) accelerates when doing this.

I'm not sure you can separate tq from hp. You can't use gear multiplication to make more hp, but with the right gearing you can get the engine to sit at a certain hp.

The difference between 3.21 and 3.55 is 11%. 11% more torque if you'd like, in a given gear, or 11% more hp at a given vehicle speed. But that's way more than an 11% bump in towing. Clicking down through the gears, 8th->7th is 26%, 7->6 is 19%, 6->5 is 29%, 5->4 is 30%, 4->3 is 26%, 3->2 is 49% and 2->1 is 50%. So, what I'm thinking is, once moving, running one gear lower is more of a tq bump than what dropping from 3.21 to 3.55 is.


I drove a delivery truck for several years , in my youth . All were gasoline powered , none with an engine larger than 366 ci , which many would consider way under powered . With enough gears , RPM's and realistic expectations , it did the job . 3250 RPM at 60 - 70 MPG was about where things ran . MPG was about 5 .


Yep, keeping dropping gears, keep the engine at or near peak hp. In the end, that 366 was what, 200hp? You could only ever do 200hp of work at most.


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 176k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 145k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 199k, his
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: IndyIan] #4752824
05/10/18 09:10 AM
05/10/18 09:10 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,197
Canuck living in California
KrisZ Online content
KrisZ  Online Content
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,197
Canuck living in California
Originally Posted By: IndyIan
Originally Posted By: KrisZ
HP do doesn't tow, it determines the rate of acceleration and top speed, torque is what does the towing. Lowering the final drive ratio increases the torque at the wheels, hence a bump in the towing capacity.

Well, torque multiplied by gearing is what tows. I doubt either rear end ratio will hold 8th with a 26' camper trailer behind them into any kind of headwind, so what does it matter if the truck runs in 7th with the 3.55 or 6th with the 3.21? Torque to the wheel will be the same, engine rpm will be close to the same. I suppose higher ratio rear ends run a bit cooler, but I doubt that is an issue.
Perhaps how the transmission is designed, running in certain gears for hours on end isn't good? or maybe the higher ratio diff comes with bigger rear brakes?


Torque multiplied by gear ratio is still torque. wink


2015 Dodge Grand Caravan-30k miles.
2007 Ford Focus ZX3-110k miles
2006 Mazda 3-168k miles
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: supton] #4752825
05/10/18 09:11 AM
05/10/18 09:11 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
Originally Posted By: dlundblad
Im talking just pulling a trailer at highway speeds with 3.21 gearing. How would this behave?

How about a 0 - 60 from a light or ~20 - 75 on an interstate ramp?


0-60, 11% worse than if 3.55's were used. 20-75, might be the same, or between same and 11% worse, as the transmission has larger gear splits than 11%.


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 176k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 145k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 199k, his
Re: Ram Pentastar towing [Re: KrisZ] #4752828
05/10/18 09:13 AM
05/10/18 09:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,891
NH
Originally Posted By: IndyIan
Perhaps how the transmission is designed, running in certain gears for hours on end isn't good? or maybe the higher ratio diff comes with bigger rear brakes?
I haven't check on brakes, that is possible--but didn't think about bad gears that wouldn't take to long pulls. Maybe that's it, maybe they worry 1st would get used for too long.

Originally Posted By: KrisZ
Torque multiplied by gear ratio is still torque. wink
Sure, but but you just made more or less of it.


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 176k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 145k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 199k, his
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™