Originally Posted By: KJSmith
http://handgunplanet.com/review/ammo-review-wilson-comba
Seems to me that a lighter bullet like that would accelerate better in a short barrel gun to get the best performance. But I think the linked test used full size guns, FWIW. Lucky Gunner seemed tohave good results with 115gr copper type bullets from the M&P9c, which is a shorter barrel.
Noted in your link the mention of 147 still being the best. But Im still somewhat confused why not 124 especially for smaller...
Or the 95/115 rounds...
Still not fully understanding why Federal went to 150 for their Micro line of 9mm, which was the original premise. Id expect something like you linked to, to perform the best especially in short barrels!
http://handgunplanet.com/review/ammo-review-wilson-comba
Seems to me that a lighter bullet like that would accelerate better in a short barrel gun to get the best performance. But I think the linked test used full size guns, FWIW. Lucky Gunner seemed tohave good results with 115gr copper type bullets from the M&P9c, which is a shorter barrel.
Noted in your link the mention of 147 still being the best. But Im still somewhat confused why not 124 especially for smaller...
Or the 95/115 rounds...
Still not fully understanding why Federal went to 150 for their Micro line of 9mm, which was the original premise. Id expect something like you linked to, to perform the best especially in short barrels!