Recent Topics
USS Forrestal question
by cjcride. 09/18/18 03:52 PM
Breaker Box
by Throt. 09/18/18 03:00 PM
Honda metal fuel tank seam leak
by wing0. 09/18/18 02:49 PM
Cracked single stage paint
by JHZR2. 09/18/18 01:45 PM
Options versus dealer oil changes
by Schmoe. 09/18/18 01:34 PM
Longevity of Mercon LV in a 2017 Ford Escape?
by mrdctaylor. 09/18/18 01:24 PM
I'm on a Lawn Boy jag
by andyd. 09/18/18 01:13 PM
Old (New) Tires
by ET16. 09/18/18 12:05 PM
iOs 12 for Apple
by madRiver. 09/18/18 12:01 PM
Synthetic oil overrated??
by Ablebody. 09/18/18 12:01 PM
Ferrari Monza SP 1/2
by DeepFriar. 09/18/18 11:58 AM
Any option to "Mark all forums read"
by Rick505. 09/18/18 11:54 AM
1981 280ZX Turbo
by 16HC. 09/18/18 11:12 AM
Muscle car emblems
by Snagglefoot. 09/18/18 10:15 AM
Burn out question
by Fitter30. 09/18/18 10:15 AM
Collector Oil Cans
by Snagglefoot. 09/18/18 10:06 AM
Thoughts on this truck and price.
by ls1mike. 09/18/18 08:39 AM
Canadian Tire Lucas Synthetic Motorcycle Oil 20w50
by Snagglefoot. 09/18/18 07:58 AM
Blast from my past
by 53' Stude. 09/18/18 07:25 AM
Newest Members
tomkat22, tabar2004, SierraMan, Rennmeister, KeithCoates
66004 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
84 registered members (16HC, Analyzer, ABomb369, Auae85, 2oldtommy, 8 invisible), 1,879 guests, and 47 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics290,599
Posts4,847,222
Members66,004
Most Online3,590
Jan 24th, 2017
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Pour point vs. W rating....questions... #4656861
02/05/18 12:24 PM
02/05/18 12:24 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 219
NY
TurboTravis Offline OP
TurboTravis  Offline OP
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 219
NY
Hey guys,

I have learned a ton here over the years without starting to many threads, but I can't seem to find an answer to my question. A friend brought up this subject yesterday and I was not able to add too much to the discussion..

Anyway, why/how is there such a variance in the pour point with a given weight of oil? Is there a minimum pour point that must be met for each weight? (Is this the same as the coldest temp the weight is rated to?) He is interested in finding the 'best' oil for cold starts in very cold weather (we are in very far Upstate NY). Is the pour point the most important spec when determining this?

To me, it seems like the pour point and viscosity can be related, but not always (meaning that a thinner oil typically has a lower pour point, but not always?)

Hope this makes sense.

-Travis

Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: TurboTravis] #4656869
02/05/18 12:31 PM
02/05/18 12:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 37,092
Ontario, Canada
OVERKILL Online content
OVERKILL  Online Content
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 37,092
Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: TurboTravis
Hey guys,

I have learned a ton here over the years without starting to many threads, but I can't seem to find an answer to my question. A friend brought up this subject yesterday and I was not able to add too much to the discussion..

Anyway, why/how is there such a variance in the pour point with a given weight of oil? Is there a minimum pour point that must be met for each weight? (Is this the same as the coldest temp the weight is rated to?) He is interested in finding the 'best' oil for cold starts in very cold weather (we are in very far Upstate NY). Is the pour point the most important spec when determining this?

To me, it seems like the pour point and viscosity can be related, but not always (meaning that a thinner oil typically has a lower pour point, but not always?)

Hope this makes sense.

-Travis


The reason that Pour Point was abandoned for determining an oil's cold temperature performance was due to its unreliability. It was so bad that they came up with two entirely new tests: CCS and MRV, to properly gauge it.

An oil with a ton of PAO in it will have a wickedly low pour point because PAO has no wax in it that will crystallize at low temperatures. However, it still thickens as temperature drops. PPD's and VII treat in a lighter base oil blend that doesn't consist of PAO can still outperform it at the temperatures the tests are performed at, the wildcard is if you are using an oil below that range; below the temperature acceptable for the grade.


2018 RAM 1500 Big Horn EcoDiesel
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT
Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: TurboTravis] #4656942
02/05/18 01:58 PM
02/05/18 01:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 459
Jupiter, FL
thescreensavers Offline
thescreensavers  Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 459
Jupiter, FL
For example 10W40 full synthetic maxlife has a lower pour point than its 0W20..

CCS taken at different though, temps 0W20 at -35 vs -25 for 10W40

https://sharena21.springcm.com/Public/Do...12-ac162d889bd1


2017 Camaro SS 1LE (Motul 8100 X-clean 5W40)
1997 Jeep XJ 4x4 (15W40 HDEO Maxlife)
Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: TurboTravis] #4656962
02/05/18 02:21 PM
02/05/18 02:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,301
SE British Columbia, Canada
Snagglefoot Offline
Snagglefoot  Offline
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,301
SE British Columbia, Canada
Look at the CCS. 5W-30 is good for a -30 C (-22 F) start. The all time low for Syracuse, New York was -13 F on New Year's Day. Not a problem for a 5W-xx oil. If you'd like to have an even more dependable start 0W-xx would make it a non-event. I'm speaking from experience. Used to live in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

SF

Last edited by Snagglefoot; 02/05/18 02:31 PM.

If you want the job done right......do it yourself.
Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: OVERKILL] #4657127
02/05/18 04:31 PM
02/05/18 04:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 282
San Francisco, CA
Flying_A Offline
Flying_A  Offline
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 282
San Francisco, CA
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
Originally Posted By: TurboTravis
Hey guys,

I have learned a ton here over the years without starting to many threads, but I can't seem to find an answer to my question. A friend brought up this subject yesterday and I was not able to add too much to the discussion..

Anyway, why/how is there such a variance in the pour point with a given weight of oil? Is there a minimum pour point that must be met for each weight? (Is this the same as the coldest temp the weight is rated to?) He is interested in finding the 'best' oil for cold starts in very cold weather (we are in very far Upstate NY). Is the pour point the most important spec when determining this?

To me, it seems like the pour point and viscosity can be related, but not always (meaning that a thinner oil typically has a lower pour point, but not always?)

Hope this makes sense.

-Travis


The reason that Pour Point was abandoned for determining an oil's cold temperature performance was due to its unreliability. It was so bad that they came up with two entirely new tests: CCS and MRV, to properly gauge it.

An oil with a ton of PAO in it will have a wickedly low pour point because PAO has no wax in it that will crystallize at low temperatures. However, it still thickens as temperature drops. PPD's and VII treat in a lighter base oil blend that doesn't consist of PAO can still outperform it at the temperatures the tests are performed at, the wildcard is if you are using an oil below that range; below the temperature acceptable for the grade.



This.

No one seems to understand and too many walk away thinking an oil with a lower pour point is a better product or is made up of more PAO. As I've said before anyone can just pour a bunch of VII and it appears to look quote good on paper vs a product with substantially more PAO content in it.

Last edited by Flying_A; 02/05/18 04:32 PM.

2008 Maserati Gran Turismo: Motul 300V Trophy 0W40
2017 Audi A3 etron: Motul X-clean FE 5W30/300V Sprint 0W15
Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: TurboTravis] #4657673
02/06/18 08:49 AM
02/06/18 08:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 767
UK
weasley Offline
weasley  Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 767
UK
It's not that simple though. You can't just pour ppd and VII into an ordinary base oil and expect to hit CCS and MRV numbers as well as KV100. Not to mention the secondary impact on API and ACEA bench and engine tests.


2017 SEAT Leon 1.4 EcoTSI 150 FR Technology DSG
2018 Volvo XC60 D4
2011 KTM 990 SMT
Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: TurboTravis] #4658078
02/06/18 03:18 PM
02/06/18 03:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,825
'Stralia
Shannow Offline
Shannow  Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,825
'Stralia
Originally Posted By: TurboTravis
Anyway, why/how is there such a variance in the pour point with a given weight of oil? Is there a minimum pour point that must be met for each weight? (Is this the same as the coldest temp the weight is rated to?) He is interested in finding the 'best' oil for cold starts in very cold weather (we are in very far Upstate NY). Is the pour point the most important spec when determining this?


Travis,
the pour point (or the more modern "Youtube Bottle Glug") test inherently feel like they are applicable to low temperature starting, and for a long, long time, the "W" rating was based on it, or factors like it.

Testing identified that the brookfield viscosity was a better correlation to how long it took things to get to the top end in test engines.


And later yet, they found that there were specific cooling rates, that occurred one winter causing engine carnage encouraged the wax crystals to grow regardless of the actual temperature extreme that was reached (so neither pour point nor straight viscosity applied).

The MRV test has the "perfect storm" of cooling rates, designed to show any weakness in wax formation, with the viscosity limit of 60,000mPa-s (600P), and importantly not to have a "yield" stress, or "jello" like phase.

This test is about whether when the pump starts pumping, the oil is capable of
a) being sucked up the feed tube (OVERKILL's analogy); or
b) "falling" back in around the pickup tube to replace the oil that has been pumped into the engine.

(CCS is about how well the engine cranks, and therefore starts).

So in order
* pick a "W grade" that suits...assuming that he wants 0W.
* pick one with a smaller MRV (for example GM has a limit of 40,000MPa-s on dexos oils, 2/3 of the absolute limit.
* if you want to flavour it with Pour point, do so, but it's last on the list.

Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: Shannow] #4658127
02/06/18 04:18 PM
02/06/18 04:18 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,135
Virginia
Tom NJ Offline
Tom NJ  Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,135
Virginia
Originally Posted By: Shannow
And later yet, they found that there were specific cooling rates, that occurred one winter causing engine carnage encouraged the wax crystals to grow regardless of the actual temperature extreme that was reached (so neither pour point nor straight viscosity applied).

The MRV test has the "perfect storm" of cooling rates, designed to show any weakness in wax formation, with the viscosity limit of 60,000mPa-s (600P), and importantly not to have a "yield" stress, or "jello" like phase.

This test is about whether when the pump starts pumping, the oil is capable of
a) being sucked up the feed tube (OVERKILL's analogy); or
b) "falling" back in around the pickup tube to replace the oil that has been pumped into the engine.

(CCS is about how well the engine cranks, and therefore starts).


Exactly. The pour point test is not part of motor oil specifications because it fails to predict an oil's low temperature performance in an engine due to its low shear rates and an inappropriate cooling rate.

The CCS test is a higher shear test that correlates well to an oil's ability to be pumped.

The MRV test uses a slow cooling rate to promote wax crystallization and correlates well to an oil's ability to flow back into the pick-up tube cavity.

Tom NJ/VA

Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: Snagglefoot] #4658147
02/06/18 04:38 PM
02/06/18 04:38 PM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,087
upstate NY
dustyroads Offline
dustyroads  Offline
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,087
upstate NY
Originally Posted By: Snagglefoot
Look at the CCS. 5W-30 is good for a -30 C (-22 F) start. The all time low for Syracuse, New York was -13 F on New Year's Day. Not a problem for a 5W-xx oil. If you'd like to have an even more dependable start 0W-xx would make it a non-event. I'm speaking from experience. Used to live in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

SF


Just for the record smile -13f was the coldest new year's day on record...not coldest day ever. At one time -26f was the record low in Syracuse, not sure if it has gone lower than that or not.

Northern NY (OP's location) is a whole different story. I saw -34 in my brief travels up there this year. I live a little southeast from Syracuse where it's down right balmy compared to the north country. Somebody in Quebec keeps leaving the door open, allowing the Arctic air to drift straight down into northern NY.


2013 F150 XLT 5.0 4X4 101k miles
Edge 5W-30 / Fram 10575
Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: Tom NJ] #4658641
02/07/18 02:37 AM
02/07/18 02:37 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,825
'Stralia
Shannow Offline
Shannow  Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,825
'Stralia
Originally Posted By: Tom NJ
The CCS test is a higher shear test that correlates well to an oil's ability to be pumped.


Tom, the CCS is specifically related to the cranking speed, and the ability of the engine to start.

The flow velocities in the galleries are still low shear.

Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: TurboTravis] #4658919
02/07/18 11:15 AM
02/07/18 11:15 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,135
Virginia
Tom NJ Offline
Tom NJ  Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,135
Virginia
Yes, it measures viscosity under high shear which in turn relates to cranking speed, which is essential for pumping the oil.

Re: Pour point vs. W rating....questions... [Re: TurboTravis] #4659143
02/07/18 03:08 PM
02/07/18 03:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,825
'Stralia
Shannow Offline
Shannow  Offline
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 40,825
'Stralia
Yes, if the engine won't start, it won't pump, but if it won't start it doesn't need to pump.

CCS is about cranking speed and starting...not pumping.

CCS
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...nd_Fuel_Economy
the relationship between viscosity and engine performance

MRV
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10402000601105540

The MRV ensures that every revolution the Positive Displacement pump makes it stays filled and delivering.

Because the engine needs to turn to deliver oil mechanically, does not make CCS any determinant of ability to pump oil...other than getting the engine running of course.


BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™