Recent Topics
What would you do...
by Bailes1992. 03/19/19 05:28 AM
'65 Mini.
by Silk. 03/19/19 02:08 AM
Our trash guy is getting on my nerves.
by Chris142. 03/19/19 01:20 AM
Ecogard trans filter
by pda1122. 03/19/19 12:11 AM
4.3 vortec issues
by mobilaltima. 03/18/19 09:17 PM
Recommendation for filter for Alfa Romeo 4C?
by phaphaphooey. 03/18/19 09:17 PM
What's the new wonder elixir?
by Yuk. 03/18/19 08:32 PM
Direct Injection Engines
by Al. 03/18/19 08:31 PM
Which mobil 1 for 19 versa?
by jahwarrior1423. 03/18/19 08:07 PM
RIP Dick Dale
by Donald. 03/18/19 08:06 PM
Found some rust on the roof of my car
by DreamerGT. 03/18/19 07:37 PM
What coolant would you run in a 1997 Dodge Ram?
by zfasts03. 03/18/19 07:11 PM
Is 10k miles too long for tire rotations?
by Nicasio. 03/18/19 06:47 PM
S-Oil Seven $14.88 on Amazon
by Nickdfresh. 03/18/19 06:41 PM
Power Steering Fluid - 07 Tahoe
by Plimbob. 03/18/19 06:38 PM
Newest Members
drsoils, Gbear, MadMikesMech, Indyfordfan, toplscuda
67551 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
50 registered members (Bailes1992, 87sammy, billt460, alcyon, bcossa2001, Agnosto, 4 invisible), 672 guests, and 52 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics286,049
Posts4,901,492
Members67,551
Most Online2,967
Mar 10th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Hop To
Are monitors still "better" than TVs? #4593346
12/03/17 07:40 PM
12/03/17 07:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,367
Frankfort, Kentucky
Shaman Offline OP
Shaman  Offline OP

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,367
Frankfort, Kentucky
Wife wants me to get a bigger monitor for my computer. Currently 20" with 1600x900 resolution. As we watch videos through Youtube etc, and because, at least to me, the current 4K UHD TVs seem, in the very least, better than what I have, I was considering looking at getting one.

I don't know what resolution and refresh rate my on-board GPU can support, so it may be a moot point. If I list all modes 1600x900 is the highest resolution shown.

Re: Are monitors still "better" than TVs? [Re: Shaman] #4593389
12/03/17 08:16 PM
12/03/17 08:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,411
NE,Ohio
Rand Offline
Rand  Offline

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,411
NE,Ohio
Thats because its the highest your monitor supports.

The sweet spot in monitors is 24" with 1080p resolution.

Much bigger and you have to sit back or turn your head side to side.

Might consider a 27-28monitor even

Do you have HDMI, displayport, DVI or VGA?

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/dell-s2418h...p;skuId=5770925

IPS screen for good color and viewing angles with "HDR".. and all for $120


2019 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.0T
Re: Are monitors still "better" than TVs? [Re: Shaman] #4593396
12/03/17 08:26 PM
12/03/17 08:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548
PA
d00df00d Offline
d00df00d  Offline

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,548
PA
AFAIK, the main advantage of a monitor over a TV is input lag. TVs tend to have a lot more. If you do a lot of fast-paced gaming, you might notice a difference. Otherwise, you'll be fine either way.


2008 BMW M3 Sedan 6MT
Re: Are monitors still "better" than TVs? [Re: Shaman] #4593529
12/03/17 10:52 PM
12/03/17 10:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 795
Chicago
bowlofturtle Offline
bowlofturtle  Offline

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 795
Chicago
That lag can be huge in terms of gaming but normal video watching i think you will be hardpressed to notice.

Also another thing to factor in, is your computer's ability to output. Getting a 4k TV as a monitor is great but if your graphics card cant support it, its useless. You mentioned 1600x900, could that be the max your video card can put out?


My toys
-05 Infiniti G35x 121k
-03 Suzuki SV650N 8.5k
Maintaining
-16 Jetta 1.4T 7k
-98 Nissan Maxima 145k
-09 Toyota Camry V6 86k

Re: Are monitors still "better" than TVs? [Re: bowlofturtle] #4594050
12/04/17 03:20 PM
12/04/17 03:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,411
NE,Ohio
Rand Offline
Rand  Offline

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 13,411
NE,Ohio
Originally Posted By: bowlofturtle

Also another thing to factor in, is your computer's ability to output. Getting a 4k TV as a monitor is great but if your graphics card cant support it, its useless. You mentioned 1600x900, could that be the max your video card can put out?


most likely its because it is the highest resolution supported by the monitor hardware.

I have not heard of any videocard that would only do 1600x900 max..

Anything within last ~10 years would do 1080p just fine..




2019 Jeep Cherokee Trailhawk 2.0T
Re: Are monitors still "better" than TVs? [Re: Shaman] #4601569
12/12/17 01:07 PM
12/12/17 01:07 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
Houston, Texas
BlitzPuppet Offline
BlitzPuppet  Offline

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 48
Houston, Texas
Yes.

Pixel Density.
Adjustibility
Refresh Rate choices (Gsync, freesync as well)
Connectibility.

It all depends on what you plan on using it for, but yes. Monitors are better than TVs.

Re: Are monitors still "better" than TVs? [Re: Shaman] #4606580
12/17/17 08:14 PM
12/17/17 08:14 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,367
Frankfort, Kentucky
Shaman Offline OP
Shaman  Offline OP

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,367
Frankfort, Kentucky
2560x1600 is max for my card. Main uses are video(mpeg, youtube, etc.), reading forums and facebook, and some OLD gaming, like Warzone 2100 and Unreal Tournament gaming.

Re: Are monitors still "better" than TVs? [Re: Shaman] #4606607
12/17/17 08:33 PM
12/17/17 08:33 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,367
Frankfort, Kentucky
Shaman Offline OP
Shaman  Offline OP

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,367
Frankfort, Kentucky
The other issue I see is that my desk has an 18" height limit, and that seems to be pushing the limit for something above 30".

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™