Recent Topics
Canadian Tire Lucas Synthetic Motorcycle Oil 20w50
by Snagglefoot. 09/18/18 07:58 AM
Blast from my past
by 53' Stude. 09/18/18 07:25 AM
Happy Birthday USAF!
by Astro14. 09/18/18 06:35 AM
Ever had a total engine failure?
by Exhaustgases. 09/18/18 02:58 AM
What is the take rate for AWD in small crossovers?
by slacktide_bitog. 09/17/18 11:12 PM
W10 driver for laptop HD4500 graphics
by asand1. 09/17/18 10:03 PM
Horizontal bladder type water tank freezing?
by WobblyElvis. 09/17/18 10:01 PM
Looking for a new carburetor for 2002 honda 90cc
by KeithCoates. 09/17/18 09:57 PM
2013 Passat fluid change
by Chuckh. 09/17/18 09:25 PM
Android Auto Recommendation
by JeffKeryk. 09/17/18 08:57 PM
Prestone Full Synthetic Power Steering Fluid
by TheLawnRanger. 09/17/18 08:55 PM
MAG1 website is excellent
by wemay. 09/17/18 08:46 PM
Does anyone know of a good free 2D cad program
by JimPghPA. 09/17/18 07:42 PM
AC DELCO PF 63E CUT OPEN
by 53' Stude. 09/17/18 06:36 PM
Last time you purchased new vehicle.
by littleant. 09/17/18 05:31 PM
$100 USD Of Gasoline
by GrtArtiste. 09/17/18 03:30 PM
Odd matchbook cover
by skyactiv. 09/17/18 03:29 PM
What are these on my snowblower?
by LeakySeals. 09/17/18 03:12 PM
Which chain lube is the best - Project Farm
by StevieC. 09/17/18 02:53 PM
Newest Members
tomkat22, tabar2004, SierraMan, Rennmeister, KeithCoates
66004 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
68 registered members (Ablebody, 2010Civic, beanoil, Al, 53' Stude, 08z06, 8 invisible), 1,106 guests, and 28 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics290,581
Posts4,846,832
Members66,004
Most Online3,590
Jan 24th, 2017
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects #4492203
08/18/17 06:58 PM
08/18/17 06:58 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,430
Georgia
DeepFriar Offline OP
DeepFriar  Offline OP
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,430
Georgia
Came across a very good, current three part article on BPI from the US Naval Institute blog, "Proceedings Today". It oulines the technical aspects of intercepting a missile just after it is launched rather than waiting for it at the other end - a subject discussed in another recent thread before some could not resist going political on it. Please don't do that again. Let's try to understand a very real, topical scientific issue rather than providing grandstanding opinion. It uses Florida as a stand-in for .... any small but dangerous adversary (which is kind of cool if concerning for untold numbers of retirees).

https://m.usni.org/magazines/proceedings...ter-north-korea


Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: DeepFriar] #4492208
08/18/17 07:02 PM
08/18/17 07:02 PM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 682
il usa
merconvvv Offline
merconvvv  Offline
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 682
il usa
If u intercept it close to launch u wud likely harm the offending party smile


1988 Mazda RX7 na PP 10w30 Noack 4.7
1994 Chrysler Concorde 3.3
1999 Ford Expedition 4.6 QSUD 10W30 NOACK 5.0
Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: DeepFriar] #4492245
08/18/17 07:31 PM
08/18/17 07:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,094
Colorado
Kuato Offline
Kuato  Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,094
Colorado
Makes sense - hot flame = easy to track, you just need a faster missile with the defensive launch platform in the right area.


Thick vs Thin test: 15k / 43k miles complete
Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: DeepFriar] #4492251
08/18/17 07:38 PM
08/18/17 07:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,949
MN
oil_film_movies Offline
oil_film_movies  Offline
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,949
MN
This stuff is unclassified? Productive to discuss openly in a U.S. military magazine? For Pete's Sake....

Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: DeepFriar] #4492258
08/18/17 07:51 PM
08/18/17 07:51 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,485
S California
OneEyeJack Offline
OneEyeJack  Offline
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,485
S California
oops

Last edited by OneEyeJack; 08/18/17 07:58 PM.
Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: DeepFriar] #4492318
08/18/17 09:20 PM
08/18/17 09:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,002
Michigan
A_Harman Offline
A_Harman  Offline
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,002
Michigan
Boost phase intercept has always seemed easier to me than terminal phase intercept. The missile is a much larger, slow moving target then.


1985 Z51 Corvette track car
2002 Camaro Z28 LS1/6-speed
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 diesel
1972 GMC 1500 shortbed project truck
Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: DeepFriar] #4492338
08/18/17 09:50 PM
08/18/17 09:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,772
Virginia Beach
Astro14 Offline
Astro14  Offline
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,772
Virginia Beach
Larger, hotter, slower, and the thin, fragile booster is under maximum aerodynamic stress.

Great time to kill an ICBM.

We just need to be close enough to kill it before booster separation...


32 Packard 15W40
02 Volvo V70 T5 0W40 M1
02 Volvo V70 XC 0W40 Edge
05 MB S600 0W40 M1
16 Tundra 1794 5W30 Pennzoil Ultra
Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: oil_film_movies] #4492354
08/18/17 10:10 PM
08/18/17 10:10 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,430
Georgia
DeepFriar Offline OP
DeepFriar  Offline OP
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,430
Georgia
Originally Posted By: oil_film_movies
This stuff is unclassified? Productive to discuss openly in a U.S. military magazine? For Pete's Sake....


We're known for being loose with information but not this time I think.

I think what you're looking at in this case is "messaging". Message is: go ahead, let your people starve while you very expensively pursue this missile development. And it costs you continued ostracizm in the larger community. We will shoot it down before it leaves your airspace. Notice also that it's written by a very junior rank. Message: Imagine the things we have that a senior officer would know (and indeed there probably are). Side message to China: Are you going to help us here or do you want us to deploy BPI assets to your doorstep? They would work just as well against your assets too.... Side message to South Koren President: You say nothing can be done to the North without your OK. Well, we'll use Naval assets if you refuse to allow THAAD to deploy/defend your country. Overall message: We're in control here - your move.

That's my take.

Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: DeepFriar] #4492464
08/19/17 12:34 AM
08/19/17 12:34 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
Ohio
L_Sludger Offline
L_Sludger  Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
Ohio
I wanna know what they have in mind for post boost interception of a MaRV payload.


too many cars and oil combinations to list in 150 characters or less
Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: oil_film_movies] #4492467
08/19/17 12:35 AM
08/19/17 12:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
Ohio
L_Sludger Offline
L_Sludger  Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
Ohio
Originally Posted By: oil_film_movies
This stuff is unclassified? Productive to discuss openly in a U.S. military magazine? For Pete's Sake....
hey look, an OPSEC hall monitor. There is always one. Hint: there isn't any junior G Man badge at the end of this train ride.


too many cars and oil combinations to list in 150 characters or less
Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: L_Sludger] #4492621
08/19/17 08:41 AM
08/19/17 08:41 AM
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,949
MN
oil_film_movies Offline
oil_film_movies  Offline
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,949
MN
Originally Posted By: L_Sludger
Originally Posted By: oil_film_movies
This stuff is unclassified? Productive to discuss openly in a U.S. military magazine? For Pete's Sake....
hey look, an OPSEC hall monitor. There is always one. Hint: there isn't any junior G Man badge at the end of this train ride.

Yer funny, in a naive sort of way!
I guess discussing certain things is OK. Maybe the military has given up on keeping some secrets. Could be part of an actual overall strategy.
The main point is "no methods or performance details" can be discussed to help the enemy.

When I worked on highly secret projects, they always threatened to jail us for any leaks. In the name of "diversity" I worked right next to an ex-national Iranian, and an ex-Chinese too, showing they were more serious about affirmative action than actually keeping vital defense secrets. Sad, but true. You can bet all the stuff I worked on is likely in Iran/China etc. now.

Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: L_Sludger] #4492650
08/19/17 09:17 AM
08/19/17 09:17 AM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,430
Georgia
DeepFriar Offline OP
DeepFriar  Offline OP
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,430
Georgia
Originally Posted By: L_Sludger
I wanna know what they have in mind for post boost interception of a MaRV payload.


There really is not much of a plan for that. After the bus kicks the warhead(s) and penaids off the defensive problem becomes immense and, of course, if the RV's are maneuvering, it can be even harder (the upside is they don't look like penaids anymore which is good for the defense). But the accuracy problem gets tougher for the offense.

The last time we had a plan for that was the point defense Sprint missile system adjunct to the Spartan system back in the '70's. The theory was, that after all the maneuvering was done, the missile was still coming to a target so kill it there if it got through your exoatmospheric defenses. Sprint came out of its hole and was doing MACH 10 within five seconds or so but very short range of about 25-30 miles. It was only operational briefly until we killed it. It did contribute in its own way to arms control negotiations. There are always the same two sides of this argument. One side wants to build the "perfect" defense and the other side wants to stick with the balance of terror so as not to be destabilizing (in their minds).

The Brits first tested a MARV, don't remember the date - proably late 60's-early 70's, under a program called Chevaline if memory serves. There is precious little open-source info on that. Do a search and see what turns up. Also search Ballistic Missile Defense for the charts showing the various levels of engagement and the programs to address those. It's all out there. As we talked about before in the earlier thread, if you have a choice, BPI is the right answer especially if it can be done from mobile assets like naval/air platforms. It is a fiendishly difficult branch of mathematics, materials, communications, surveillance,processing and decsion making and we've been spending $2-5B a year on it since forever and, detractors to the contrary, all that is not wasted and the best parts are likely not visible.

Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: oil_film_movies] #4492661
08/19/17 09:28 AM
08/19/17 09:28 AM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,430
Georgia
DeepFriar Offline OP
DeepFriar  Offline OP
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,430
Georgia
Originally Posted By: oil_film_movies
[quote=L_Sludger][quote=oil_film_movies] Could be part of an actual overall strategy.
The main point is "no methods or performance details" can be discussed to help the enemy.

When I worked on highly secret projects, they always threatened to jail us for any leaks.


Same here. And I couldn't agree with you more about secrets. There is dumb and there is stupid and we too often work urgently on the latter.

One benefit of being a sieve though is that the bad guys have a harder time discerning between what's real and what we make up in disinformation. The story goes that many moons ago we "allowed" the Soviets to steal a very complicated control system for oil pipeline transportation control. They installed it somewhere in Siberia at the nexus of many pipelines. I've read that you could see the explosion from space......I

Turns out we're not totally stupid.

Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: oil_film_movies] #4492866
08/19/17 02:23 PM
08/19/17 02:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
Ohio
L_Sludger Offline
L_Sludger  Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
Ohio
Originally Posted By: oil_film_movies
Originally Posted By: L_Sludger
Originally Posted By: oil_film_movies
This stuff is unclassified? Productive to discuss openly in a U.S. military magazine? For Pete's Sake....
hey look, an OPSEC hall monitor. There is always one. Hint: there isn't any junior G Man badge at the end of this train ride.

Yer funny, in a naive sort of way!
I guess discussing certain things is OK. Maybe the military has given up on keeping some secrets. Could be part of an actual overall strategy.
The main point is "no methods or performance details" can be discussed to help the enemy.

When I worked on highly secret projects, they always threatened to jail us for any leaks. In the name of "diversity" I worked right next to an ex-national Iranian, and an ex-Chinese too, showing they were more serious about affirmative action than actually keeping vital defense secrets. Sad, but true. You can bet all the stuff I worked on is likely in Iran/China etc. now.




They didn't classify this rather informative ABM tech video - and this was at the height of the Cold War.

How about this rather more detailed technical, also unclassified, also approved for general release article on radar signal propagation over the horizon? Do you think that the State Prize-winning, highly renowned technical experts of the Democratic people's Republic of Maximum Korea would take this information to build a doomsday device? http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2012/1210690.pdf

post script: I worked on sensitive, do-not-export jet engine stuff and have kept my lips sealed tightly about what I did. Not because any of the stuff was groundbreaking - it wasn't - I'm just scared to death of getting hauled away in a black van on account of ITAR's onerous regs. But among the things I worked on was the CFMi LEAP-1C which is going to China, for their COMAC C919 jet engines. The information relating to that engine was also marked for non-export. But the engine itself is being exported to them. Kind of cognitive dissonance there.
The Chinese used the CFM-56 engines that they were able to get their hands on in the 80s and tore them apart to discover their secrets. Then they used the core design of that engine to be the heart of their military jet engine design that will be used in aircraft hostile to American interests. I wonder why we gave them those engines in the first place? And now they are getting bleeding-edge technology in the CFMi LEAP engine - great!
There isn't a shortage of design information that is available to our enemies. What our enemies lack are advanced metallurgy for things like single crystal nickel engine blades, or the extremely high precision machining needed to make those parts. And that's what has held the Chinese and even the Indians behind. The Chinese still can't build a reliable long-lived high performance jet turbofan engine for their fighters because they haven't mastered the materials and manufacturing aspect.


too many cars and oil combinations to list in 150 characters or less
Re: Boost Phase Intercept - Technical Aspects [Re: DeepFriar] #4492879
08/19/17 02:43 PM
08/19/17 02:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
Ohio
L_Sludger Offline
L_Sludger  Offline
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
Ohio
Relating to the Chinese jet engines reverse engineered from CFM56 design knowledge:
Shenyang WS-20 to power their C-17 equivalent transport [the WS-20 is being tested on IL-76 testbeds but will make it to the Y-20 airlifter very soon]


Shenyang WS-10 to power their Chengdu J-20 'F22-appearing' 'stealth' fighter



too many cars and oil combinations to list in 150 characters or less
Page 1 of 2 1 2

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™