Recent Topics
Anyone use a radiant barrier?
by daves66nova - 10/14/19 10:13 PM
FS- Corolla 15 inch hubcap
by bowlofturtle - 10/14/19 10:04 PM
tire wear from -0.5 degree of camber
by bowlofturtle - 10/14/19 09:48 PM
E85 fuel composition?
by JorgeSimon - 10/14/19 09:12 PM
Microsoft enables Tamper Protection for Home Users
by Jimmy9190 - 10/14/19 08:13 PM
Need rotary hammer for chiseling tile & glued floor laminate
by JLawrence08648 - 10/14/19 08:06 PM
Super Auto of2500x (57045) cut open
by Inlo - 10/14/19 08:01 PM
Detailed the new Renegade!
by HoosierJeeper - 10/14/19 07:34 PM
All My Filters
by kstanf150 - 10/14/19 07:07 PM
Switching from conventional to synthetic
by messerschmitt - 10/14/19 06:04 PM
Lower MPG
by borgward - 10/14/19 06:02 PM
MacBook Pro Issues?
by miden851 - 10/14/19 05:28 PM
Any aquarists in the house?
by Mad_Hatter - 10/14/19 04:39 PM
Motorcraft Spark Plugs on Ebay?
by panthermike - 10/14/19 04:25 PM
Change Fram Ultra with 720 hours on it?
by CharlieBauer - 10/14/19 04:02 PM
Powerstop Brake kits
by RhondaHonda - 10/14/19 03:00 PM
Oil recommendations
by Speak2Mountain - 10/14/19 02:28 PM
Maxlife ATF
by charmer37 - 10/14/19 02:18 PM
Newest Members
robinasu, TriniDerian, kaspurr, avcdo, Inlo
69563 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
69 registered members (argulus, AdditiveOCD, 4WD, 379KITTY, 69GTX, 6 invisible), 1,402 guests, and 32 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics295,976
Posts5,088,496
Members69,563
Most Online3,532
Jul 30th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 5 1 2 5
ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? #4468073 07/23/17 02:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 14,329
T
tig1 Offline OP
OP Offline
T
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 14,329
I am at the point where I don't really trust an ATF that meets many differenty spec's, for several different makes.


2007 Ford Fusion 248,000 miles
M1 5-20HM
2017 Ford Fusion 79K
M1 0-20EP
10,000 mile OCIs on both engines
M1 ATF and Valvoline LV
M1 10-30 in all OPE
MC filters

Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468085 07/23/17 02:53 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,613
J
Jimzz Offline
Offline
J
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,613
Because many makers fluid are not that much different. Most of the issues were the viscosity and how it holds up to heat. You notice all the ATFs that meet a lot of specs is a synthetic base like Valvoline Maxlife for example. So since the fluid can hold its viscosity much better now it can work on more vehicles.


yup
Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468087 07/23/17 02:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,337
G
Gebo Offline
Offline
G
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,337
Originally Posted By: tig1
I am at the point where I don't really trust an ATF that meets many differenty spec's, for several different makes.


I feel exactly the same as you.


'98 LEX LS400 300K
'02 4Runner 245K
'05 Lex LS430 85K
'07 Lex GX470 65K

Shell Gas and Truck & Supertech Full Syn HM
Toyota ATF's and Coolant
Amsoil Gear Oil and Grease
Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468095 07/23/17 03:04 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
Quote:
The secret of Multi-Vehicle ATF's such as MaxLife or D4 or D6 or Amsoil ATF's is the mix of specialized friction modifier chemistry's which cover a spectrum of dynamic friction coefficients.

Broad Spectrum ATF

Originally Posted By: tig1
I have wondered if this spec thing is more of a scam than anything else. I have used M1 ATF for years in the Fusion and M1 ATF doesn't have the FNR-5 spec. that my Fusion calls for.


What do you think M1 ATF is?

It is mostly a higher viscosity version of Redline D6, MaxLife ATF, and Amsoil ATL.


https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/4418097/1


Last edited by MolaKule; 07/23/17 03:08 PM.

"You ... sadist," said Mr Cummings, "you try to make people think." Ezra Pound (1885-1972)
Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468104 07/23/17 03:11 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 7,333
W
Wolf359 Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 7,333
I think if you're in a jam and that's the only fluid available use it. But if you have the option, I'd use the one that meets the spec. Valvoline is actually the worse, they claim that their fluid is suitable for applications that call for a specific spec, but they're not actually certified for that spec. I think they have to pay some license fee to do it and they don't pay it. Their Mercon V and other fluids are like that. There are actually alternatives that meet spec and are cheaper than Valvoline (like supertech) so why bother with a fluid that isn't approved by the manufacturer?

Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: Wolf359] #4468122 07/23/17 03:35 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
Originally Posted By: Wolf359
But if you have the option, I'd use the one that meets the spec. Valvoline is actually the worse, they claim that their fluid is suitable for applications that call for a specific spec, but they're not actually certified for that spec...


Don't know what you mean by actually worse.

Projected coverage and Labeling have been discussed many times before here on BITOG.

No where does Valvoline or any of the other Multi-Vehicle ATF manufacturers claim licensing numbers by the OEM's.

Most ATF manufacturers such as Valvoline also carry Certified fluids that carry OEM licensing numbers, but at a higher per quart price, because licensing adds to the cost.








Last edited by MolaKule; 07/23/17 03:36 PM.

"You ... sadist," said Mr Cummings, "you try to make people think." Ezra Pound (1885-1972)
Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: Wolf359] #4468124 07/23/17 03:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,720
Hootbro Offline
Offline
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,720
Originally Posted By: Wolf359
I think if you're in a jam and that's the only fluid available use it. But if you have the option, I'd use the one that meets the spec. Valvoline is actually the worse, they claim that their fluid is suitable for applications that call for a specific spec, but they're not actually certified for that spec. I think they have to pay some license fee to do it and they don't pay it. Their Mercon V and other fluids are like that. There are actually alternatives that meet spec and are cheaper than Valvoline (like supertech) so why bother with a fluid that isn't approved by the manufacturer?


So where is the data showing transmissions exploded because they used a consumer manufactured "recommend" ATF vs. actual licensed ATF product? Examples of people doing their first ATF change at 150K miles do not count, I am talking about normal service interval changes.

I think these multi-vehicle ATF makers like Valvoline, Mobil, AMSOIL and a host of others have done their homework. In my opinion, most of these vehicle makers that spec low viscosity fluids Mercon LV, Dexron VI, Toyota WS, Matic S and others, are all basically calling for the same fluid but pride does not allow them to call out an already made fluid used in other makes and they then spec their own fluid and call it something proprietary.

If people are in warranty, I get the need to stay with something licensed, but outside warranty, there is plenty of reliable multi-fluids to fill ones maintenance needs.


2020 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon 3.6L (Dealer Bulk 0W-20)
2017 Jeep Renegade Latitude 2.4L (Idemitsu 0W-20)

Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468125 07/23/17 03:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
thumbsup thumbsup


"You ... sadist," said Mr Cummings, "you try to make people think." Ezra Pound (1885-1972)
Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: MolaKule] #4468149 07/23/17 04:20 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 7,333
W
Wolf359 Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 7,333
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Originally Posted By: Wolf359
But if you have the option, I'd use the one that meets the spec. Valvoline is actually the worse, they claim that their fluid is suitable for applications that call for a specific spec, but they're not actually certified for that spec...


Don't know what you mean by actually worse.

Projected coverage and Labeling have been discussed many times before here on BITOG.

No where does Valvoline or any of the other Multi-Vehicle ATF manufacturers claim licensing numbers by the OEM's.

Most ATF manufacturers such as Valvoline also carry Certified fluids that carry OEM licensing numbers, but at a higher per quart price, because licensing adds to the cost.









I feel they're the worse because they're basically mass market fluids which you can find on the shelf at the local Walmart. There are other fluids that do the same thing, but they're more boutique fluids so the owners probably know what they're getting into when buying them. I think they're basically somewhat deceptive because their wording usually says "suitable for applications that call for xxx" but it doesn't actually say that it meets that spec so if you don't read it carefully you'd think it met the spec. And I'm not sure Valvoline actually has a fluid that can be easily found on the shelf that meets Mercon V spec or even MB 236.14 (ATF 134).

Originally Posted By: Hootbro
If people are in warranty, I get the need to stay with something licensed, but outside warranty, there is plenty of reliable multi-fluids to fill ones maintenance needs.


My question is why would you pay more to buy a fluid that doesn't meet manufacturer spec when there are cheaper fluids out there that meet spec? Doesn't make any sense. Plus when your transmission blows up, do you blame the transmission or the fluid? You've got a tough case to prove there, why take the risk by using something that doesn't meet spec? Again, the whole thing doesn't make sense. Pointless risk, don't really see the potential gain.

Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: Wolf359] #4468159 07/23/17 04:26 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
Originally Posted By: Wolf359
Originally Posted By: MolaKule
Originally Posted By: Wolf359
But if you have the option, I'd use the one that meets the spec. Valvoline is actually the worse, they claim that their fluid is suitable for applications that call for a specific spec, but they're not actually certified for that spec...


Don't know what you mean by actually worse.

Projected coverage and Labeling have been discussed many times before here on BITOG.

No where does Valvoline or any of the other Multi-Vehicle ATF manufacturers claim licensing numbers by the OEM's.

Most ATF manufacturers such as Valvoline also carry Certified fluids that carry OEM licensing numbers, but at a higher per quart price, because licensing adds to the cost.



I feel they're the worse because they're basically mass market fluids which you can find on the shelf at the local Walmart. There are other fluids that do the same thing, but they're more boutique fluids so the owners probably know what they're getting into when buying them. I think they're basically somewhat deceptive because their wording usually says "suitable for applications that call for xxx" but it doesn't actually say that it meets that spec so if you don't read it carefully you'd think it met the spec. And I'm not sure Valvoline actually has a fluid that can be easily found on the shelf that meets Mercon V spec or even MB 236.14 (ATF 134).

Originally Posted By: Hootbro
If people are in warranty, I get the need to stay with something licensed, but outside warranty, there is plenty of reliable multi-fluids to fill ones maintenance needs.


My question is why would you pay more to buy a fluid that doesn't meet manufacturer spec when there are cheaper fluids out there that meet spec? Doesn't make any sense. Plus when your transmission blows up, do you blame the transmission or the fluid? You've got a tough case to prove there, why take the risk by using something that doesn't meet spec? Again, the whole thing doesn't make sense. Pointless risk, don't really see the potential gain.


Valvoline MaxLife labeling indicates MerconV coverage except in California which took issue with the viscosity requirement but which PQIA earlier accepted a statement indicating Valvoline's line of reasoning.

Quote:
*Please note that legislation in California prohibits Valvoline from recommending MaxLife™ ATF in certain applications where the viscometrics of MaxLife™ ATF do not match those of the official OEM specification. Valvoline therefore does not recommend the use of MaxLife™ ATF in these applications in California.


Of course we are aware of California's pendent for Overregulation.

Quote:
I think they're basically somewhat deceptive because their wording usually says "suitable for applications that call for xxx" but it doesn't actually say that it meets that spec so if you don't read it carefully you'd think it met the spec.


Nothing deceptive about it as long as they don't state the respective fluids are licensed by the OEM's.

Don't know why there are two separate threads on the same subject???? ??? I guess people are only interested in their own worlds.

https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/4389454/'Broad_Spectrum'_ATF,_how_does#Post4389454


Last edited by MolaKule; 07/23/17 04:32 PM.

"You ... sadist," said Mr Cummings, "you try to make people think." Ezra Pound (1885-1972)
Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468193 07/23/17 05:01 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
L
L_Sludger Offline
Offline
L
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,947
I have a hard time trusting the universal stuff too.
That's why I spend the extra time and money to get the manufacturer specific stuff - I don't want to take that chance.

Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: L_Sludger] #4468197 07/23/17 05:06 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 20,444
Originally Posted By: L_Sludger
I have a hard time trusting the universal stuff too.
That's why I spend the extra time and money to get the manufacturer specific stuff - I don't want to take that chance.


We have choices here and I have never seen a bottle of Valvoline MaxLife move off the shelves and twist anyone's arm.


"You ... sadist," said Mr Cummings, "you try to make people think." Ezra Pound (1885-1972)
Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468199 07/23/17 05:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,877
S
SilverFusion2010 Offline
Offline
S
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,877
I went with motorcraft Mercon LV for my drain and fill. Before that it had the maxlife multi LV fluid and it ran fine, but now the little voice is quiet because I know the ford specified fluid is in there


2010 Ford Fusion SE 3.0L V6, 181 miles M1 HM 10w-30
Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468216 07/23/17 05:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,822
U
user52165 Online Content
Online Content
U
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,822
Originally Posted By: tig1
I am at the point where I don't really trust an ATF that meets many differenty spec's, for several different makes.


Based on what evidence?

Or just "feelings"?

Re: ATF that meets many spec's: How can it? [Re: tig1] #4468245 07/23/17 05:58 PM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 682
M
merconvvv Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 682
Motorcraft atf is pretty cheap.
Thats what i use in the expedition drain and fill. About 4 or 5 drains and fill.


1988 Mazda RX7 na PP 10w30 Noack 4.7
1994 Chrysler Concorde 3.3
1999 Ford Expedition 4.6 QSUD 10W30 NOACK 5.0
Page 1 of 5 1 2 5
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™