Recent Topics
Old Laptop - Keeps Freezing - Help!
by reemoe2. 03/21/19 09:52 PM
Cinnamon Cake
by StevieC. 03/21/19 09:43 PM
AMALIE OILS
by kstanf150. 03/21/19 09:41 PM
oem filters
by mobilaltima. 03/21/19 09:34 PM
Magna1 10W30
by mobilaltima. 03/21/19 09:32 PM
Found triple threat
by deven. 03/21/19 09:26 PM
Chrysler Valvetrain week??
by clinebarger. 03/21/19 08:50 PM
Lisle funnel for radiator drain & fill
by paulri. 03/21/19 07:45 PM
Rattle in Catalytic Converter 2003 Suburban
by Fitz98. 03/21/19 05:59 PM
Mobil1 5W-30 EP, 8317mi, 2007 Prius Touring, 98133
by DuckRyder. 03/21/19 05:32 PM
Maxima Pro Plus 20/50 syn bike oil
by Truckedup. 03/21/19 04:54 PM
CHAMPION COS 3593A **NEW** CUT OPEN
by 53' Stude. 03/21/19 04:28 PM
NAPA PROSELECT 21348 CUT OPEN
by 53' Stude. 03/21/19 04:21 PM
Atlanta No Nonsense Honda dealer
by DuckRyder. 03/21/19 04:16 PM
Echo (PAS) - Good, Bad, Other?
by GemStater. 03/21/19 04:06 PM
Serpentine Belt - When To Change?
by Propflux01. 03/21/19 03:08 PM
Magnetic Out, ST in at Wally Auto Care Center.
by csandste. 03/21/19 02:26 PM
One license plate in a Two-Plate State
by bunnspecial. 03/21/19 02:07 PM
Newest Members
scottjeffrey, Mowata, LoneWolf04, Paperboy, Flinch
67579 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
78 registered members (Alfred_B, 2010Civic, Ama0787, ABCarr, 69GTX, 2015_PSD, 8 invisible), 1,503 guests, and 61 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics286,215
Posts4,904,411
Members67,579
Most Online2,967
Mar 10th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Hop To
Torque Management #4460925
07/16/17 12:51 PM
07/16/17 12:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,165
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,165
NH
Nick's comments about the GM 5.3 being "gutless" (at least off the line) reminded me of something: torque management. I recall the 5.3 getting some flack from the 5.7 guys who claimed the 5.7 had more low end torque; but it appears that GM upped the TQM at some point with the 4L60/65. [I also recall some guys turning it off, via tuners.] Some poking around (see this thread ) indicates the 4L65 was 380ft-lb input torque and 680ft-lb output. In 1st gear (3:1) that means less than 230 peak allowed; that can be what, 25% reduction on the early 5.3's, and a third on the later ones?

Novak indicates the later 6L80 is 440 max input and 664 max output. Torque management still has to be used (although the 2:1 second gear probably near-full torque once in second). [The 6L90 allows 885 max output.]

Strikes me as odd, but it probably makes some sense: once past a certain torque output, a truck (or even SUV) becomes traction limited. Other driveline parts might not be rated for much more toque. And once out of first gear, full torque is allowed.

So I guess my question is: do the other transmission makers (Ford, ZF, etc) have similar limitations, where max input torque can exceed max output torque when in first gear?

[Heck--I almost forgot--a torque convertor can get upwards of 2:1 torque multiplication. That's not near max torque of the engine, but it's gotta be a factor too.]


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 179k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 147k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 203k, his
Re: Torque Management [Re: supton] #4460932
07/16/17 12:58 PM
07/16/17 12:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,163
Ontario, Canada
OVERKILL Offline
OVERKILL  Offline

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,163
Ontario, Canada
IIRC, the Ford 5R110 behind the 6.0L PSD would do full power upshifts, and that's a 600lb-ft of torque engine. My buddy Jon's with a tuner would pull like a bloody freight train. Mind you, I think the 5R110 was in a whole other league when compared to the transmissions we are discussing, as it dwarfed the 4R75W gasser trans in size.

I THINK the 4R100 was the same way, but don't hold me to that, as I'm going by memory.

I know there's definitely some torque management going on in my GC with the ZF 8spd.


2019 RAM 1500 Sport - Mobil 1 EP 0w-20, FRAM Ultra
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT - Ravenol SSL 0w-40, FRAM Ultra
Re: Torque Management [Re: supton] #4461134
07/16/17 06:27 PM
07/16/17 06:27 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,825
USA
oldhp Offline
oldhp  Offline

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,825
USA
To me anything controlled by a ECU is going to be held back so not to damage the drive train. My R/T 6 speed Challenger is the perfect example. It has the skip shift feature, 1st to 4th. 4th gear at 21 MPH and you floor it. All that happens is it slowly accelerates, no pinging, no bucking, no jumping, nothing except a slow RPM crawl up to 5500RPM. From a rolling crawl in first and you stomp it, it'll start to kinda spin tires and start making engine growling noise as it accelerates. Turn off the traction control and the tires go up in smoke almost instantly. Stock ECU's will control torque so one does not injure the drive train. Cheers2


2018 RAM 1500 3.6/8 speed.
2017 Jeep Sahara Unlimited 3.6
"U kan't fixe it......if'n it ain't broke."
Re: Torque Management [Re: supton] #4461140
07/16/17 06:34 PM
07/16/17 06:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 11,343
Phoenix, AZ
Nick1994 Online content
Nick1994  Online Content

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 11,343
Phoenix, AZ
I think part of it is GM's stupid electronic throttle bodies that came out with the 5.3L, slow and unresponsive.

My 5.7L had a throttle cable and it was instantaneous throttle response. Low end power for days, could be the fastest one across the intersection at around 2,200 RPMs

The 5.3L Silverado and Tahoe in the family couldn't chirp the tires even on a turn if you tried. It's like they're still asleep when mashing on the throttle and 1st gear is a mile long.


2015 Hyundai Sonata 2.4L 92k STP Synthetic HM 10w30 & Wix
2000 Toyota Camry 2.2L 233k Mobil Super HM 10w40 & Fram Ultra
1996 Jeep Cherokee 4.0L 148k Mobil 1 HM 10w40 & Fram Ultra
Re: Torque Management [Re: supton] #4461150
07/16/17 06:47 PM
07/16/17 06:47 PM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 485
Texas
JBinTX30 Offline
JBinTX30  Offline

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 485
Texas
A tune would fix the 5.3L issues no problem lol.

A tune sure did make a difference on the Trailblazer. Nice crisps shifts. Instant throttle response, not even the same vehicle.

More MPG and more instant power.. its a win win.

And of course no speed limiter laugh

If you have a vehicle on this LIST he does them for $149.


05 GMC Yukon XL SLT 5.3 CE 5w30 51042
06 Chevy Trailblazer LS 4.2 PP 5w30 XG9837
Re: Torque Management [Re: supton] #4461364
07/17/17 12:50 AM
07/17/17 12:50 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,867
Texas
GMBoy Online content
GMBoy  Online Content

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,867
Texas
I did the Diablo Sport tune on my 2006 GMC Sierra Denali with the 6.0L. I reduced the Torque management but didn't completely eliminate it. Made a night/day difference and the truck is more responsive. I chose not to completely eliminate TM because the truck is AWD (60/40 split until another axle needs more than it can transfer as much as 100% to a slipping axle) and traction is very good and I don't want to break anything under hard launches lol.

Last edited by GMBoy; 07/17/17 12:51 AM.
Re: Torque Management [Re: GMBoy] #4461379
07/17/17 03:21 AM
07/17/17 03:21 AM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 650
WA
SnowDrifter Offline
SnowDrifter  Offline

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 650
WA
Originally Posted By: GMBoy
I did the Diablo Sport tune on my 2006 GMC Sierra Denali with the 6.0L. I reduced the Torque management but didn't completely eliminate it. Made a night/day difference and the truck is more responsive. I chose not to completely eliminate TM because the truck is AWD (60/40 split until another axle needs more than it can transfer as much as 100% to a slipping axle) and traction is very good and I don't want to break anything under hard launches lol.


I was under the impression torque management would only pull timing during shifts? It effects off the line too?


2005 Tahoe - 140k
2003 Forester(the swagger wagon) - Rehomed
1999 Passat - Rehomed
Re: Torque Management [Re: OVERKILL] #4461388
07/17/17 05:03 AM
07/17/17 05:03 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,330
Sunny Florida
SteveSRT8 Offline
SteveSRT8  Offline

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,330
Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: OVERKILL
IIRC, the Ford 5R110 behind the 6.0L PSD would do full power upshifts, and that's a 600lb-ft of torque engine. My buddy Jon's with a tuner would pull like a bloody freight train. Mind you, I think the 5R110 was in a whole other league when compared to the transmissions we are discussing, as it dwarfed the 4R75W gasser trans in size.

I THINK the 4R100 was the same way, but don't hold me to that, as I'm going by memory.

I know there's definitely some torque management going on in my GC with the ZF 8spd.



Some? Our 14 RAM 5.7 won't even open the throttle until 3rd gear! TM reduces many parameters, not just timing, folks. Get rid of it at your own risk, you may affect certain driveline components adversely.

I have run an aftermarket tuner on my SRT8 for many years. Testing at track days revealed the car is no quicker at the strip but it sure is more fun to drive the car yourself...


"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix
Re: Torque Management [Re: SnowDrifter] #4461658
07/17/17 11:19 AM
07/17/17 11:19 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,165
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,165
NH
Originally Posted By: SnowDrifter
I was under the impression torque management would only pull timing during shifts? It effects off the line too?


With drive by wire, it should be quite easy to simply not open throttle past a certain point (and to close it just before shifting). I'm sure they could play with more variables--but once they got control over that butterfly, I have to wonder if it simply got as easy as "reduce throttle by x% y milliseconds before shift".


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 179k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 147k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 203k, his
Re: Torque Management [Re: Nick1994] #4461660
07/17/17 11:22 AM
07/17/17 11:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,165
NH
supton Offline OP
supton  Offline OP

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,165
NH
Originally Posted By: Nick1994
I think part of it is GM's stupid electronic throttle bodies that came out with the 5.3L, slow and unresponsive.

My 5.7L had a throttle cable and it was instantaneous throttle response. Low end power for days, could be the fastest one across the intersection at around 2,200 RPMs

The 5.3L Silverado and Tahoe in the family couldn't chirp the tires even on a turn if you tried. It's like they're still asleep when mashing on the throttle and 1st gear is a mile long.


The 5.7's I think were more often available with deeper gearing? Maybe, maybe not. I guess it shows why rear end selection was such a big thing back then, and why it still is now, at least for GM--they give up a lot right off the line.

That said, once TQM came along, did 4L60's start lasting longer?


2011 Toyota Camry, base, 2.5L/6MT, 179k, hers
2010 Toyota Tundra DC, 4.6L/6AT, 147k, ours
1999 Toyota Camry LE, 2.2L/4AT, 203k, his
Re: Torque Management [Re: supton] #4461786
07/17/17 01:03 PM
07/17/17 01:03 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,739
Storrs, Connecticut
jeepman3071 Offline
jeepman3071  Offline

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,739
Storrs, Connecticut
Originally Posted By: supton

That said, once TQM came along, did 4L60's start lasting longer?


That is a good question. It would be interesting to see if they did.

As for drive by wire, I agree with Nick. The 5.3 V8s I have driven did feel gutless down low, considering the HP and TQ numbers those engines had. Drive by wire also seems to vary in responsiveness across brands.

My dad's 5.7L Hemi in the Jeep GC feels pretty responsive off the line, but is much smoother than my mom's 2011 Honda Fit. The Fit does not have much power or torque, but the throttle is initially very jerky. My GF's 2006 BMW is almost the opposite, the throttle pedal seems dead until halfway down then it begins to go. The car has plenty of power, but the lag is pretty apparent. I've heard it is better on manual and RWD models though.


2000 Jeep Cherokee 4.0L (181k) - Pennzoil 10w30, Napa Gold 1516, Magnefine trans filter
2009 BMW 328i (38k) - Castrol Edge Euro 0w40, MANN HU816X
Re: Torque Management [Re: SteveSRT8] #4461956
07/17/17 03:27 PM
07/17/17 03:27 PM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,163
Ontario, Canada
OVERKILL Offline
OVERKILL  Offline

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,163
Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8

Some? Our 14 RAM 5.7 won't even open the throttle until 3rd gear!


OK, I was being generous, LOL!! grin


2019 RAM 1500 Sport - Mobil 1 EP 0w-20, FRAM Ultra
2016 Grand Cherokee SRT - Ravenol SSL 0w-40, FRAM Ultra
Re: Torque Management [Re: SnowDrifter] #4462365
07/17/17 10:51 PM
07/17/17 10:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,867
Texas
GMBoy Online content
GMBoy  Online Content

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,867
Texas
Originally Posted By: SnowDrifter
Originally Posted By: GMBoy
I did the Diablo Sport tune on my 2006 GMC Sierra Denali with the 6.0L. I reduced the Torque management but didn't completely eliminate it. Made a night/day difference and the truck is more responsive. I chose not to completely eliminate TM because the truck is AWD (60/40 split until another axle needs more than it can transfer as much as 100% to a slipping axle) and traction is very good and I don't want to break anything under hard launches lol.


I was under the impression torque management would only pull timing during shifts? It effects off the line too?


Yes, TM is most noticeable off the line. You floor the pedal and there is a lag then a slow ramp up of power. This is to protect the driveline. It does, as you say, retard timing during shifts as well and this is also for a more smooth shift.

Re: Torque Management [Re: supton] #4463222
07/18/17 07:36 PM
07/18/17 07:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,863
Fort Worth, Texas
clinebarger Online content
clinebarger  Online Content

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,863
Fort Worth, Texas
Gearbox Torque rating is what the Carriers/Planets, Ring Gears, Shafts & other Hard Parts can handle. The Holding Members....Sprag, Roller Clutch, Frictions CANNOT....That is what the Input Torque rating is about.

4L60E & 4L65E have different ratings, Quoting 4L65E specs for a 5.3L application doesn't matter because GM never put 4L65E's behind 5.3L......Yes, I have heard the rumors about people special ordering them, But It's all talk 'til someone shows me a RPO sticker that list's both a 5.3L & a 4L65E.


Originally Posted By: supton

The 5.7's I think were more often available with deeper gearing? Maybe, maybe not. I guess it shows why rear end selection was such a big thing back then, and why it still is now, at least for GM--they give up a lot right off the line.

That said, once TQM came along, did 4L60's start lasting longer?


The 5.7L Vortec's have TQM as well....Just not as aggressive as the '03 & up 5.3L's. '99-'02 5.3L's have cable driven throttle bodies unless the truck has traction control which is generally reserved for higher end SUV's.

Both 5.7L & 5.3L trucks were available with 3.42, 3.73, & 4.11 gearing. Just about any 1/2 ton truck with 3.42's is going to feel doggy. Let's not forget that GMT400 trucks are lighter than GMT800 trucks especially a Crew Cab GMT800 4x4.
The 17" wheels & taller tires that came out in '03/'04 didn't help things!
The 5.3L was NOT the replacement for the 5.7L, The 6.0L was!! The 5.3L is the replacement for the 5.0L Vortec....At least originally when gas was a dollar a gallon.

The stock Ignition Timing Tables on LSx powered trucks are REALLY bad, It's tough to make power when you have little to NO timing advance at full throttle, This is where the improved drivability can be had without killing your drivetrain by turning off the Torque Management. Though I DO eliminate the TQM on my personal vehicles....I accept & know the risks involved.

Torque Management doesn't seem to affect 4L60E longevity....When paired to a stock 5.3L. The life-to-overhaul on 4L60E's is around 160,000 miles. A lot of them die from bearing failures & pump failures which has little to do with the power that is ran through them.

Stock 2004 5.3L Main High Octane Spark Table



Performance Tuned 5.3L Main High Octane Spark Table


2001 Chevy Camaro L92/4L80E
2006 Chevy 2500HD LBZ/Allison 1000
2010 Toyota Corolla 2ZR-FE/U341E
2000 Toyota Avalon 1MZ-FE/A541E
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™