Recent Topics
Walmart ammo clearance
by redbone3 - 11/16/19 03:35 PM
GENERAL Q regarding SPX snow plow
by Kira - 11/16/19 03:13 PM
78 C10 at show
by WiskyBadger - 11/16/19 03:00 PM
300blk ammo?
by buck91 - 11/16/19 02:52 PM
The Rock is still alive!
by Char Baby - 11/16/19 02:48 PM
Weird fuel leak
by BeerCan - 11/16/19 01:02 PM
Sinopec 75w-90 Synthetic
by jdw1222 - 11/16/19 12:51 PM
Honda Oil Filter
by miden851 - 11/16/19 12:28 PM
VOA for QSAD 10w-40?
by natas - 11/16/19 12:02 PM
Ford v Ferrari - anyone seen the movie yet?
by Oro_O - 11/16/19 12:01 PM
who made this??
by ted s - 11/16/19 11:41 AM
Drill Bits
by MasterSolenoid - 11/16/19 11:32 AM
2000 Honda Insight Crunchy 1st & 2nd
by Rmay635703 - 11/16/19 09:32 AM
Update Site to VerticalScope Inc board?
by CB900F2 - 11/16/19 09:27 AM
Replace brake clips with each pad change
by Donald - 11/16/19 08:26 AM
HDEO in motorcycles
by kebabaluba - 11/16/19 08:14 AM
More on Cord Cutting - costs going up
by Donald - 11/16/19 07:24 AM
Bosch 3423 C&P
by FordBroncoVWJeta - 11/16/19 05:50 AM
Monroe wouldn’t patch a trailer tire
by dlundblad - 11/16/19 05:06 AM
Newest Members
aka_Claus, Diverdown, natas, matt3540, ChrisWild
69885 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
104 registered members (69Torino, ABursell, 2oldtommy, AandPDan, 1978elcamino, 53' Stude, 15 invisible), 2,431 guests, and 25 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics297,510
Posts5,117,095
Members69,885
Most Online3,589
Nov 2nd, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 44 1 2 3 44
Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382160 04/18/17 02:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,380
S
Shannow Offline
Offline
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,380
Wow...

Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382165 04/18/17 03:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 21,974
Z
ZeeOSix Offline
Offline
Z
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 21,974
Originally Posted By: Gokhan
Bearing wear (lead) doesn't seem to have improved with 0W-40. Therefore, viscosity of 0W-20 seems sufficient for this application to prevent bearing oil-film breakdown.


Seems a bit inconclusive since the levels for chromium (rings), aluminum (pistons & cam journals) and lead (main & rod bearings) went up in the 0W-20 run dated 9/7/15 compared to the 0W-20 run dated 2/22/14. The 0W-20 run dated 9/7/15 also shows higher in those same metals compared to the 0W-40 run.

Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: 4WD] #4382170 04/18/17 04:07 AM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 386
Timo325 Offline
Offline
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 386
Originally Posted By: 4WD
And there were 20's ...



I want!

Heads are rolling over this thread.


2011 Odyssey Touring Elite 80k mi. M1 EP, 0W-20, FU
2008 Mustang GT 81k mi. Edge EP (Gold) 5W-20, FU

Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382175 04/18/17 04:26 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,380
S
Shannow Offline
Offline
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,380
flow doesn't lubricate...AEHaas never ever could provide any supportive evidence on flow=lubrication, nor could one of his keenest adherants.

As the the test methodology here, there's no back to backs, or even repeat testing, i.e. 0W20, 0W40, 0W20. 0W40, 0W20 to see if the correlations even hold...without a possible (or confirmed) coolant leak...then there's the assumptions on what the metals in the oil actually mean.

Pretty conclusive conclusion given the above, eh ?

Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382177 04/18/17 04:37 AM
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 560
K
KL31 Offline
Offline
K
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 560
I'm with Shannow on this. Regardless of whether the test showed 0w40 better or 0w20 better, it's very hard to prove anything with such small sample sizes.

Just too many variables. I encourage the OP to make this thread on going. Give us more results and try to stay neutral. One scenario is that they both end up being rather equal and you pick 0w20 for fuel economy. But just one run off each.... give us more. Switch brands if you desire but keep it 0w20 vs 0w40.


95 MX-3 2.5L|Shell Helix Ultra 5W40|Wix 51356
04 Focus 1.8L|Wesfil Cooper WZ63|Valvoline MST 5W30
05 Kluger 3.3L|Wesfil Cooper WZ418|Magnatec 10W30 Semi Syn
Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382180 04/18/17 04:45 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 21,974
Z
ZeeOSix Offline
Offline
Z
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 21,974

Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382182 04/18/17 04:53 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 33,399
D
demarpaint Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 33,399
Interesting read. I always thought you needed to run at least two to three runs of the same oil/grade, in a mechanically sound engine then make the switch and repeat before coming to any conclusions. The problem is it would take a very long time for most of us to complete the testing. I'm with Shannow on this as well.


God Bless Our Troops

Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382189 04/18/17 05:13 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,050
Astro14 Offline
Offline
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 10,050
You've run UOA on a 30+ year old engine with mechanical problems and 260,000 miles on it?

There are so many uncontrolled variables here that your UOA don't demonstrate anything. Certainly, a few PPM on one metal in this older, failing engine are not the "final verdict".

Last edited by Astro14; 04/18/17 05:15 AM.

32 Packard 15W40
01 Volvo V70 T5 0W30 AMSOIL SS
02 Volvo V70 T5 0W30 Edge
02 Volvo V70 XC 0W40 Edge
05 MB S600 0W40 M1
16 Tundra 1794 5W30 Pennzoil Ultra
Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382192 04/18/17 05:22 AM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,361
B
BigD1 Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,361
Some people claim that Mobil 1 UOA have more iron. Cleaning out what lesser oils leave behind possibly.


1992 Toyota Pickup--AmazonBasics Conventional--10W-30--Toyota 90915YZZD1
Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382206 04/18/17 05:53 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 600
D
doyall Offline
Offline
D
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 600
Amazing, simply amazing.

Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382213 04/18/17 06:00 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,052
K
KrisZ Offline
Offline
K
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,052
All I see is extremely strong conclusions in light of very weak "evidence".


2015 Grand Caravan 3.6L - 31k miles.
2006 Mazda 3 2.0L - 171k miles
Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382222 04/18/17 06:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,555
V
Virtus_Probi Offline
Offline
V
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,555
Iron went up by 50%, but chromium went down by 62%, so M1 0W40 wins.

EOD


2014 Forester XT, 105000 miles
Last Change;
PP 5w30 d1G2
Tokyo Roki 15208AA170 filter
Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382228 04/18/17 06:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,380
S
Shannow Offline
Offline
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,380

Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Shannow] #4382236 04/18/17 06:31 AM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,555
V
Virtus_Probi Offline
Offline
V
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,555
Originally Posted By: Shannow


Did you not note my End Of Discussion post...hmmmm???
;^)

The copper levels in those UOAs look horrifying to me, particularly with the M1 when the engine is new. I know some engines will read high copper when new, but they still look nuts with Amsoil when the engine has over 30kmiles on it. Was that just the nature of that engine, maybe due to an oil cooler or something like that?
Interesting that they found that Amsoil thickened so much...M1 has the (deserved?) reputation for shearing, and it seemed that even the promotional materials for M1 AP showed it losing viscosity faster than the oils to which it was being compared. But, XOM claimed that the catastrophic thickening would occur much later with the AP, hence the 1 year/20kmile claims.


2014 Forester XT, 105000 miles
Last Change;
PP 5w30 d1G2
Tokyo Roki 15208AA170 filter
Re: Thin or thick (TGMO 0W-20/M1 0W-40): Final verdict [Re: Gokhan] #4382239 04/18/17 06:32 AM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,001
K
kr_bitog Offline
Offline
K
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,001
Quote:
Oil consumption with TGMO 0W-20 SN was small thanks to new valve-stem oil seals -- about 0.3 quarts in 5,000 miles. The last fill was Mobil 1 (M1) 0W-40 SN (older, non-FS formula). Oil consumption stayed the same or perhaps increased slightly to about 0.4 quarts in 5,000 miles. I was surprised that thicker oil didn't improve the consumption -- in fact made it slightly worse.


Did you replace PCV valve and piston ring when valve-stem oil seals replaced ?

Page 2 of 44 1 2 3 44
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™