MolaKule
Staff member
Originally Posted By: ndfergy
So am I to assume AW properties of FM's is a canard and its primary, if not sole, purpose is for friction reduction? Or, is your statement semantical where certain FM's are multi-functional providing anti-wear properties?
Quote:
The critical difference between AW/EP additive films and FM films is in their mechanical properties. AW/EP films are semiplastic deposits which are hard to shear off. Thus, under shearing conditions, their coefficient of friction is moderately to high. The exceptions are the organometallic compounds listed above. Friction modification films consist of orderly, close-packed arrays of multimolecular "whiskers," loosely adhering to each other. The outer layers are sheared-off easily, allowing for low coefficient of friction. The phenomena can be described as a deck of plastic coated playing cards lying on the table and sliding off the top card easily.
So am I to assume AW properties of FM's is a canard and its primary, if not sole, purpose is for friction reduction? Or, is your statement semantical where certain FM's are multi-functional providing anti-wear properties?
Quote:
The critical difference between AW/EP additive films and FM films is in their mechanical properties. AW/EP films are semiplastic deposits which are hard to shear off. Thus, under shearing conditions, their coefficient of friction is moderately to high. The exceptions are the organometallic compounds listed above. Friction modification films consist of orderly, close-packed arrays of multimolecular "whiskers," loosely adhering to each other. The outer layers are sheared-off easily, allowing for low coefficient of friction. The phenomena can be described as a deck of plastic coated playing cards lying on the table and sliding off the top card easily.